‘There is a new sheriff in town,’ says former US diplomat

Ali Khedery
Updated 08 April 2017
Follow

‘There is a new sheriff in town,’ says former US diplomat

JEDDAH: A former US diplomat and political analyst said US President Donald Trump’s strike against the Bashar Assad regime sends a clear message to rogue states and dictators that they should not mess with the new American administration.
“There is a new sheriff in town,” said Ali Khedery, former special assistant to five US ambassadors to Iraq and senior adviser to three four-star chiefs of US Central Command, during an interview with Arab News on Friday.
“Barack Obama is mercifully gone, and now there is a new American president — one who is not only willing to speak but willing to act.”
According to Khedery, Trump has now laid down a marker for Assad and his patrons and allies — namely the Lebanese Hezbollah, Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, the Iraqi Shiite militias and Russia.
“President Trump and his national security team are men of action who will not grant dictators such as Assad carte blanche to murder innocent civilians with impunity, particularly using weapons of mass destruction.”
He described Trump’s action as perfect. “Frankly I think that President Trump and his national security team played it perfectly. This is exactly what the world expects from the United States of America, which is the world’s only superpower,” he said.
“This (the chemical attack on Khan Sheikhun in Idlib, Syria) was a clear instance where international treaties were broken, where international norms were violated, where a dictator used weapons of mass destruction to kill and wound hundreds of his own innocent civilians.”
He said the world expected and deserved a swift assessment, a swift decision, and swift action from the president of the US. “This was a flawless performance by President Trump, particularly when you factor in that there was no collateral damage associated with the cruise missile strike,” said Khedery.
Describing the airstrikes as “a goldilocks decision” — one that was just right — Khedery said: “This was neither an under-reaction nor an over-reaction. It was a very swift and proportional response to Assad’s use of weapons of mass destruction against civilian members of his population. Tomahawk cruise missiles were directed at the airbase where the attack was apparently planned and where the aircraft that carried out the attack are based. So the missiles hit the taxiways, the aircraft, the fuel depots, the ammunition dumps, and the command and control facilities behind the use of weapons of mass destruction.”
He said if Trump had not acted now, his administration would have been partially paralyzed. “If he had not acted, if he had shied away from the task, he would have lost enormous credibility very early into his presidency and his credibility would have been fatally damaged for the next four years,” he said.
“This swift and measured missile strike will clearly resonate with rogue states and non-state terrorists, beginning with Russia, North Korea, Iran, Assad, Hezbollah, Daesh and Al-Qaeda.”
He said the reasoning put forward by the Obama administration — that any action in Syria would result in catastrophe because it would involve Russia — was not correct.
“Russia did not have a massive overt presence in Syria when the first series of major attacks using chemical weapons took place in 2013. What happened was Assad and his Iranian patrons slowly began to test the West’s resolve and to commit more and more war crimes,” Khedery said.
“First, they started with Scud missiles against civilians; then they started using cluster bombs; then they used incendiary weapons, and then barrel and chlorine bombs. As the rebels made more and more progress, Damascus began using chemical weapons. They had several test cases when they used small amounts and the West knew and did not do anything. And then in 2013, Assad used chemical weapons in a particularly egregious way when more than 1,000 innocent civilians were killed and wounded in Ghouta — this was after President Obama’s self-imposed red line. Even then, he did not respond. Obama fatally damaged his credibility when he did not enforce his red line and respond with military action using the authorities granted to American presidents under the War Powers Act. Instead, Obama unnecessarily went to Congress seeking permission, knowing that Congress was too divided and disorganized to formulate a coherent response,” he said.
According to Khedery, such lack of action was misused by Assad and his Iranian masters. “They saw that they had a free hand to murder the Syrian population. That deeply undermined the Western coalition, led by the United States.”
“Through this decisive and proportional response, President Trump has just gone a long way toward restoring America’s damaged credibility across the Middle East and the globe,” said Khedery.
“What has just happened sends a very clear signal that President Trump, along with Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, and National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster are serious men. I have worked personally with all three of the latter: Believe me, these are men who are not to be messed with.”
On whether these strikes were a one-off action, Khedery said: “I think it is too early to tell. We are only two and a half months into the Trump administration. However, it should be clear by now that President Trump is not a man to be underestimated. He is well advised. He is thoughtful. He is decisive. And he is tough. So you should not test his resolve in ways that dictators and terrorists were able to do with President Obama, who literally enabled them to get away with mass murder with impunity.”
He said the airstrikes were an implicit warning to Iran. “Certainly, Iran will now think twice before harassing the United States in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, the Strait of Hormuz, or the Bab Al-Mandab. They will certainly give harassment an additional thought now,” he said.
“But I don’t believe that they will stop by any stretch of the imagination. In fact, I am quite certain that Iran will continue with its murderous and malign activities across the region just because Iran has very clear regional hegemonic ambitions and no moral standards to constrain their conduct.”
He said the Trump administration does not intend to allow Iran to continue to get away with “murder, ethnic cleansing, mass state sponsorship of terrorism, and other destabilizing activities” without a response. “You will see over the coming weeks, months and years a reinvigorated American resolve across the Middle East. The United States will once again stand firmly with our allies against our enemies, starting
with Iran,” said Khedery.

 


Lebanon says 2 hurt as Israeli troops fire on people returning south after truce with Hezbollah

Updated 58 min 39 sec ago
Follow

Lebanon says 2 hurt as Israeli troops fire on people returning south after truce with Hezbollah

  • Lebanon’s state-run National News Agency said two people were wounded by Israeli fire in Markaba, close to the border, without providing further details
  • It said Israel fired artillery in three other locations near the border

BEIRUT: At least two people were wounded by Israeli fire in southern Lebanon on Thursday, according to state media. The Israeli military said it had fired at people trying to return to certain areas on the second day of a ceasefire with the Hezbollah militant group.
The agreement, brokered by the United States and France, includes an initial two-month ceasefire in which Hezbollah militants are to withdraw north of the Litani River and Israeli forces are to return to their side of the border. The buffer zone would be patrolled by Lebanese troops and UN peacekeepers.
Lebanon’s state-run National News Agency said two people were wounded by Israeli fire in Markaba, close to the border, without providing further details. It said Israel fired artillery in three other locations near the border. There were no immediate reports of casualties.
An Associated Press reporter in northern Israel near the border heard Israeli drones buzzing overhead and the sound of artillery strikes from the Lebanese side.
The Israeli military said in a statement that “several suspects were identified arriving with vehicles to a number of areas in southern Lebanon, breaching the conditions of the ceasefire.” It said troops “opened fire toward them” and would “actively enforce violations of the ceasefire agreement.”
Israeli officials have said forces will be withdrawn gradually as it ensures that the agreement is being enforced. Israel has warned people not to return to areas where troops are deployed, and says it reserves the right to strike Hezbollah if it violates the terms of the truce.
A Lebanese military official said Lebanese troops would gradually deploy in the south as Israeli troops withdraw. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to brief media.
The ceasefire agreement announced late Tuesday ended 14 months of conflict between Israel and Hezbollah that began a day after Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023 attack out of Gaza, when the Lebanese militant group began firing rockets, drones and missiles in solidarity.
Israel retaliated with airstrikes, and the conflict steadily intensified for nearly a year before boiling over into all-out war in mid-September. The war in Gaza is still raging with no end in sight.
More than 3,760 people were killed by Israeli fire in Lebanon during the conflict, many of them civilians, according to Lebanese health officials. The fighting killed more than 70 people in Israel — over half of them civilians — as well as dozens of Israeli soldiers fighting in southern Lebanon.
Some 1.2 million people were displaced in Lebanon, and thousands began streaming back to their homes on Wednesday despite warnings from the Lebanese military and the Israeli army to stay out of certain areas. Some 50,000 people were displaced on the Israeli side, but few have returned and the communities near the northern border are still largely deserted.
In Menara, an Israeli community on the border with views into Lebanon, around three quarters of homes are damaged, some with collapsed roofs and burnt-out interiors. A few residents could be seen gathering their belongings on Thursday before leaving again.


Algeria facing growing calls to release French-Algerian author Boualem Sansal

Updated 28 November 2024
Follow

Algeria facing growing calls to release French-Algerian author Boualem Sansal

  • “The detention without serious grounds of a writer of French nationality is unacceptable,” France’s Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said
  • The European Parliament discussed Algeria’s repression of freedom of speech on Wednesday and called for “his immediate and unconditional release”

PARIS: Politicians, writers and activists have called for the release of French-Algerian writer Boualem Sansal, whose arrest in Algeria is seen as the latest instance of the stifling of creative expression in the military-dominated North African country.
The 75-year-old author, who is an outspoken critic of Islamism and the Algerian regime, has not been heard from by friends, family or his French publisher since leaving Paris for Algiers earlier this month. He has not been seen near his home in his small town, Boumerdes, his neighbors told The Associated Press.
“The detention without serious grounds of a writer of French nationality is unacceptable,” France’s Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said on Wednesday.
He added Sansal’s work “does honor to both his countries and to the values we cherish.”
The European Parliament discussed Algeria’s repression of freedom of speech on Wednesday and called for “his immediate and unconditional release.”
Algerian authorities have not publicly announced charges against Sansal, but the APS state news service said he was arrested at the airport.
Though no longer censored, Sansal’s novels have in the past faced bans in Algeria. A professed admirer of French culture, his writings on Islam’s role in society, authoritarianism, freedom of expression and the civil war that ravaged Algeria throughout the 1990s have won him fans across the ideological spectrum in France, from far-right leader Marine Le Pen to President Emmanuel Macron, who attended his French naturalization ceremony in 2023.
But his work has provoked ire in Algeria, from both authorities and Islamists, who have issued death threats against him in the 1990s and afterward.
Though few garner such international attention, Sansal is among a long list of political prisoners incarcerated in Algeria, where the hopes of a protest movement that led to the ouster of the country’s then-82 year old president have been crushed under President Abdelmadjid Tebboune.
Human rights groups have decried the ongoing repression facing journalists, activists and writers. Amnesty International in September called it a “brutal crackdown on human rights including the rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association.”
Algerian authorities have in recent months disrupted a book fair in Bejaia and excluded prominent authors from the country’s largest book fair in Algeria has in recent months, including this year’s Goncourt Prize winner Kamel Daoud,
“This tragic news reflects an alarming reality in Algeria, where freedom of expression is no more than a memory in the face of repression, imprisonment and the surveillance of the entire society,” French-Algerian author Kamel Daoud wrote in an editorial signed by more than a dozen authors in Le Point this week.
Sansal has been a polarizing figure in Algeria for holding some pro-Israel views and for likening political Islam to Nazism and totalitarianism in his novels, including “The Oath of the Barbarians” and “2084: The End of the World.”
Despite the controversial subject matter, Sansal had never faced detention. His arrest comes as relations between France and Algeria face newfound strains. France in July backed Morocco’s sovereignty over the disputed Western Sahara, angering Algeria, which has long backed the independence Polisario Front and pushed for a referendum to determine the future of the coastal northwest African territory.
“A regime that thinks it has to stop its writers, whatever they think, is certainly a weak regime,” French-Algerian academic Ali Bensaad wrote in a statement posted on Facebook.


Iranian Revolutionary Guards officer killed in Syria, SNN reports

Updated 28 November 2024
Follow

Iranian Revolutionary Guards officer killed in Syria, SNN reports

DUBAI: Iranian Revolutionary Guards Brig. Gen. Kioumars Pourhashemi was killed in the Syrian province of Aleppo by “terrorists” linked to Israel, Iran’s SNN news agency reported on Thursday without giving further details.
Rebels led by Islamist militant group Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham on Wednesday launched an incursion into a dozen towns and villages in northwest Aleppo province controlled by Syrian President Bashar Assad.


Israel-Hezbollah ceasefire unlikely to hold: UK ex-spy chief

Updated 28 November 2024
Follow

Israel-Hezbollah ceasefire unlikely to hold: UK ex-spy chief

  • Richard Dearlove: Agreement suits both parties in ‘short to medium term’
  • Deal leaves Iran ‘exposed’ as its Lebanese ally is temporarily incapacitated

LONDON: The ceasefire deal struck this week between Israel and Hezbollah is unlikely to hold, a former head of MI6 has warned.

Richard Dearlove, who headed the British intelligence service from 1999 to 2004, told Sky News that the deal, which came into effect on Wednesday, is a “retreaded agreement from 2006.”

That initial deal was designed to keep Hezbollah away from the border region with Israel, overseen by the Lebanese military and the UN, but in effect it “did absolutely nothing,” he said.

This week’s deal suits both Israel and Hezbollah “in the short to medium term,” Dearlove said, adding: “The Israelis must know how much of the infrastructure of Hezbollah they’ve taken down … They haven’t taken it down completely, but maybe the Lebanese state can reassert some of its authority as the government of Lebanon and keep Hezbollah to an extent under control. We just have to wait and see what happens.”

He said the ceasefire deal will be a blow to Hezbollah’s backer Iran, leaving the latter “exposed” with one of its allies temporarily incapacitated.

But he warned that this could escalate into “direct” confrontation between Israel and Iran were the latter to launch another ballistic missile attack.


Israeli FM: ‘No justification’ for ICC to take steps against Israeli leaders

Updated 28 November 2024
Follow

Israeli FM: ‘No justification’ for ICC to take steps against Israeli leaders

  • The foreign minister also said Israel would finish the war in Gaza when it “achieves its objectives”

PRAGUE: Israeli foreign minister Gideon Saar said on Thursday that the ICC had “no justification” for issuing arrests warrants for Israeli leaders, in a joint press conference with Czech Foreign Minister Jan Lipavsky.
Saar told Reuters Israel has appealed the decision and that it sets a dangerous precedent.
The foreign minister also said Israel would finish the war in Gaza when it “achieves its objectives” of returning hostages being held by Hamas in Gaza and ensuring the Iranian-backed group no longer controls the strip. Saar said Israel does not intend to control civilian life in Gaza and that he believes peace is “inevitable” but can’t be based on “illusions.”