UN envoy says Syria talks at ‘very critical moment’

Pro-Turkey Syrian fighters (AFP)
Updated 25 January 2018
Follow

UN envoy says Syria talks at ‘very critical moment’

VIENNA: The UN special envoy for Syria said that peace talks due to resume in Vienna on Thursday are taking place at a crucial moment.
“Definitely I am optimistic because it is the only way to be at such moments,” Staffan de Mistura said on Wednesday. “It is a very, very critical moment.”
He said a “full delegation of the opposition and a full delegation of the government” would be in the Austrian capital for the two days of talks.
France’s foreign minister said meanwhile in Paris that the Vienna talks are the “last hope” for reaching a political solution to the seven-year war.
“There is no prospect of a political solution today except, and it’s the last hope, the meeting that opens tomorrow in Vienna led by the United Nations and with all the stakeholders present,” Jean-Yves Le Drian said.
Speaking in parliament, Le Drian also highlighted a “considerable worsening of the humanitarian situation” in Afrin, where Turkish forces are carrying out an offensive against a Kurdish militia, as well as in Idlib and in Eastern Ghouta.
The talks hosted by de Mistura in the Austrian capital come after eight previous rounds in Geneva that failed to get the warring parties even to talk to each other.
The discussions have repeatedly stumbled over the fate of Syrian President Bashar Assad.
Representatives from his government have refused to meet the opposition directly until it drops demands that he leave office.

Nasr Al-Hariri from the main opposition group, the Syrian Negotiations Commission (SNC), said late Wednesday in Vienna that the next two days would be “a real test for all the sides.”
They will be “a real test for the opposition for how much they are committed to those international solutions; and also to the regime, how much the regime is going to be engaging; as well as the international community and how serious they are about reaching a political solution,” Hariri told reporters through an interpreter.
The talks come ahead of a peace conference in the Russian Black Sea resort of Sochi backed by Russia, Iran and Turkey on January 30.
Moscow initially hoped to convene peace talks in Sochi last November but those efforts collapsed following a lack of agreement among co-sponsors.
Syria’s main opposition group has said it would need “full and clear information” before agreeing to take part, but government representatives have said they will attend.
The Sochi summit specifically aims to set up new constitution for post-war Syria — something which the UN’s de Mistura also hopes to make progress on.
Western countries view the Sochi track with skepticism, concerned that Russia and Iran will carve out a settlement that will favor their ally Assad.
Syria’s complex, multi-sided war has claimed more than 340,000 lives, forced millions to flee their homes and left Syria in ruins.
Bolstered by Moscow’s intervention in 2015, Damascus has regained the upper hand militarily, retaking large swathes of rebel-held territory.
Russian-backed Syrian forces have also dealt severe blows to the Daesh group, whose self-proclaimed “caliphate” in Iraq and Syria has largely collapsed.
In December the first Russian troops began returning home after President Vladimir Putin ordered a pullout, saying their mission had been largely completed.
De Mistura has called on Putin to push the Assad regime to hold new elections, saying a military victory alone was not enough to “win the peace.”


’I won’t leave. Put that in your brain.’ Palestinians reject Trump’s call to expel them from Gaza

Updated 10 min 25 sec ago
Follow

’I won’t leave. Put that in your brain.’ Palestinians reject Trump’s call to expel them from Gaza

  • Hundreds of thousands in the territory rushed to return to their homes – even if destroyed – as soon as they could following the ceasefire
  • Palestinians across the region saw in it an effort to erase them completely from their homeland

DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip: Saeed Abu Elaish’s wife, two of his daughters and two dozen others from his extended family were killed by Israeli airstrikes over the past 15 months.
His house in northern Gaza was destroyed. He and surviving family now live in a tent set up in the rubble of his home.
But he says he will not be driven out, after President Donald Trump called for transferring all Palestinians from Gaza so the United States could take over the devastated territory and rebuild it for others. Rights groups said his comments were tantamount to a call for “ethnic cleansing” and forcible expulsion.
“We categorically reject and will resist any plans to deport and transfer us from our land,” he said from the Jabaliya refugee camp.
Trump’s call for depopulating Gaza has stunned Palestinians. Hundreds of thousands in the territory rushed to return to their homes – even if destroyed – as soon as they could following the ceasefire reached last month between Israel and Hamas.
Though some experts speculated that Trump’s proposal might be a negotiating tactic, Palestinians across the region saw in it an effort to erase them completely from their homeland, a continuation of the expulsion and displacement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their homes in what is now Israel during the 1948 war surrounding its creation.
That event is known among Palestinians as the “Nakba,” Arabic for the “Catastrophe.” Trump’s statement — a wild swing away from years of US policy — meshed with calls from far-right politicians in Israel to push Palestinians out of Gaza, particularly into Egypt.
“We don’t want a repeat of our ancestors’ tragedy,” said Abu Elaish, a health care worker.
Like many, Abu Elaish could point to his own family’s experience. In May 1948, Israeli forces expelled his grandparents and other Palestinians and demolished their homes in the village of Hoj in what’s now southern Israel just outside the Gaza Strip, he said. The family resettled in Gaza’s Jabaliya camp, which over the decades grew into a densely built urban neighborhood. Israeli troops leveled most of the district during fierce fighting with Hamas militants over recent months.
Mustafa Al-Gazzar was 5 years old, he said, when his family and other residents were forced to flee as Israeli forces in 1948 attacked their town of Yabneh in what is now central Israel.
Now in his 80s, he sat outside his home in the southern Gaza city of Rafah, flattened by an airstrike, and said it was unthinkable to go after surviving 15 months of war.
“Are you crazy, you think I would leave?” he said. “You think you’ll expel me abroad and bring other people in my place? … I would rather live in my tent, under rubble. I won’t leave. Put that in your brain.”
“Instead of being sent abroad, I should return to my original land where I was born and will die,” he said, referring to Yabneh, located near what is now the central Israeli city of Yavneh. He said Trump should be seeking a two-state solution. “This is the ideal, clear solution, peace for the Israelis and peace for the Palestinians, living side by side,” he said.
In his comments Tuesday alongside visiting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump said Palestinians from Gaza should be resettled in lands in Egypt, Jordan or elsewhere, promising them a “beautiful place.” Egypt and Jordan have both rejected Trump’s call to resettle Palestinians on their soil.
Trump said the US would take over Gaza and rebuild it into a “Riviera of the Middle East” for “the world’s people,” dismissing the idea that Palestinians would refuse to leave or want to return.
Amna Omar, a 71-year-old from the central Gaza town of Deir Al-Balah, called Trump a “madman.”
Omar was able to go to Egypt during the war after her husband was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. In Cairo, doctors told them his cancer had gone untreated for too long and he died in October.
She said she intends to go back home as soon as she can, as did other Palestinians in Egypt.
“Gaza is our land, our home. We as Gazans have the right to the land and want to rebuild it,” she said. “I don’t want to die in Egypt like my husband. I want to die at home.”
Palestinians have shown a powerful determination to return to their homes after nearly the entire population was displaced by the war. Joyous crowds streamed back to northern Gaza and Rafah, both of which were devastated by Israeli bombardment and ground offensives.
With their neighborhoods reduced to landscapes of rubble, many returnees are homeless, water is scarce and electricity is largely non-existent in most areas. Still, for most, the destruction has not diminished their will to stay.
“We remain here, even if it means living in the rubble of our homes — better that than living in humiliation elsewhere,” said Ibrahim Abu Rizk, who returned to Rafah to find his home in ruins. “For a year and a half, we have been slaughtered, bombed, and destroyed, only to then leave just like that?”
The ceasefire deal brokered by the US, Egypt and Qatar, calls for a return of Palestinians to their homes as well as a massive international reconstruction effort in its third phase – assuming Israel and Hamas can reach a deal on who will govern the territory.
International law forbids the forced removal of populations. The Israeli rights group B’tselem said Trump’s statement “constitutes a call for ethnic cleansing through uprooting and forcibly transferring some 2 million people. This is Trump and Netanyahu’s roadmap for a second Nakba of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.”
Palestinian refugees have long demanded they be allowed to return to homes in what is now Israel, citing the right to return widely recognized for refugees under international law. Israel argues that right does not apply to the Palestinians and says a mass return would end the Jewish majority in the country.
Throughout the 15-month war in Gaza, many Palestinians expressed fear that Israel’s goal was to drive the population into neighboring Egypt. The government denied that aim, though some hard-right members of the coalition called for encouraging Palestinians to leave Gaza and for restoring Jewish settlements there. The Israeli-occupied West Bank — home to more than 500,000 settlers — has also seen more than a year of escalated violence.
The rejection of Trump’s call was echoed by Palestinians in the West Bank and in surrounding Arab countries like Jordan and Lebanon that are also home to large refugee populations.
“If he wants to displace the population of Gaza,” Mohammed Al-Amiri, a resident in the West Bank city of Ramallah, said of Trump, “then he should return them to their original homeland from which they were displaced in 1948, inside Israel, in the depopulated villages.”


Saudi Venture Capital Co. invests $1bn, strengthening Kingdom’s VC leadership

Updated 38 min 57 sec ago
Follow

Saudi Venture Capital Co. invests $1bn, strengthening Kingdom’s VC leadership

RIYADH: Saudi Venture Capital Co. has committed $1 billion in investments to date, with its total assets— including contributions from partners— reaching approximately $4.8 billion, according to the company’s latest “Impact Report.”

The report highlights SVC’s pivotal role in expanding Saudi Arabia’s private capital ecosystem, underscoring the company’s contributions to record growth in venture capital, private equity, venture debt, and private credit markets since its inception in 2018.

To date, SVC has supported 54 funds, which together have invested in over 800 startups and small and medium enterprises across key sectors such as e-commerce, fintech, healthcare, edtech, transport, and logistics.

According to MAGNiTT, Saudi Arabia remained the top destination for VC investments in the MENA region for the second consecutive year, securing $750 million in 2024. This accounted for 40 percent of regional VC capital, with a 16 percent increase in deal flow, closing 178 deals— the most of any MENA country.

The UAE followed with $613 million, leading in deal volume with 188 deals and 12 exits.

“We are committed to further stimulating the private capital ecosystem in Saudi Arabia by launching required investment programs and developmental initiatives based on an analysis of the ecosystem’s needs,” said Nabeel Koshak, CEO and board member of SVC.

The report underscores Saudi Arabia’s continued dominance in the MENA VC landscape, reinforcing its position as the leading VC hub in the region. This achievement is closely aligned with the broader economic diversification goals outlined in Saudi Vision 2030, which seeks to transform the Kingdom’s financial sector and broader economy.

Since its launch, SVC’s strategic initiatives have played a key role in increasing investor participation in Saudi startups and SMEs. These initiatives have encouraged financial institutions to establish VC and PE funds, while also attracting both regional and international investors to the Kingdom’s growing entrepreneurial ecosystem.

In addition to its investment activities, SVC has launched several developmental programs designed to strengthen the private capital ecosystem. These programs include educational collaborations with local and global partners aimed at enhancing the skills of fund managers and investors, as well as producing market insight reports to support data-driven decision-making.

Established in 2018 as a subsidiary of the SME Bank, part of the National Development Fund, SVC focuses on stimulating and sustaining financing for startups and SMEs in Saudi Arabia.


Rahim Al-Hussaini is named new spiritual leader of Ismaili Muslims, succeeding his father

Updated 35 min 16 sec ago
Follow

Rahim Al-Hussaini is named new spiritual leader of Ismaili Muslims, succeeding his father

  • Rahim Al-Hussaini was designated as the Aga Khan V
  • The Aga Khan is treated by his followers as a head of state

LISBON: Rahim Al-Hussaini was named Wednesday as the new Aga Khan, spiritual leader of the world’s millions of Ismaili Muslims.
He was designated as the Aga Khan V, the 50th hereditary imam of the Shiite Ismaili Muslims, in his father’s will. His father died Tuesday in Portugal.
The Aga Khan is considered by his followers to be a direct descendant of the Prophet Muhammad and is treated as a head of state.
The Aga Khan Development Network and the Ismaili religious community announced earlier that His Highness Prince Karim Al-Hussaini, the Aga Khan IV and 49th hereditary imam of the Shiite Ismaili Muslims, died surrounded by his family.
It said his burial and will-reading will be held in the coming days, followed by an homage ceremony.
The late Aga Khan was given the title of “His Highness” by Queen Elizabeth in July 1957, two weeks after his grandfather the Aga Khan III unexpectedly made him heir to the family’s 1,300-year dynasty as leader of the Ismaili Muslim sect.
A defender of Islamic culture and values, he was widely regarded as a builder of bridges between Muslim societies and the West despite — or perhaps because of — his reticence to become involved in politics.
The Aga Khan Development Network, his main philanthropic organization, deals mainly with issues of health care, housing, education and rural economic development. It says it works in over 30 countries and has an annual budget of about $1 billion for nonprofit development activities.
Ismailis lived for many generations in Iran, Syria and South Asia before also settling in east Africa, Central Asia and the Middle East, as well as Europe, North America and Australia more recently. They consider it a duty to tithe up to 12.5 percent of their income to the Aga Khan as steward.


A special tribunal to prosecute Russian leaders over Ukraine wins backing from European institutions

Updated 39 min 46 sec ago
Follow

A special tribunal to prosecute Russian leaders over Ukraine wins backing from European institutions

  • Legal experts agreed on the framework for the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine
  • “Now, justice is coming,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said

BRUSSELS: A project to establish a court to prosecute the Russian leaders who orchestrated the invasion of Ukraine took a step forward Wednesday, with an announcement from a group of international organizations, including the European Union and the Council of Europe, working together with Ukraine.
Legal experts agreed on the framework for the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine, which will allow for the prosecution of senior Russian officials for planning and coordinating the full-scale invasion in 2022.
“When Russia chose to roll its tanks over Ukraine’s borders, breaking the UN Charter, it committed one of the gravest violations: the Crime of Aggression. Now, justice is coming,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in a statement.
The move to create a special tribunal aims to fill a void created by limitations on the International Criminal Court. While The Hague-based court can go after Russian nationals for genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, it cannot prosecute Russians for orchestrating the invasion itself.


The 2002 Rome Statute which created the court does include the crime of aggression but only for countries who have joined the court. The Russian Federation is not a member state.
“The accountability gap for the crime of aggression must be closed right now because the lid of Pandora’s Box is blown off completely and our world is plunged into chaos and darkness,” Ukraine’s deputy minister of justice Iryna Mudra told reporters after the announcement was made.
Ukraine has been pushing for the creation of a special tribunal since early in the conflict. “If we want true justice, we should not look for excuses and should not refer to the shortcomings of the current international law but make bold decisions that will correct those shortcomings that unfortunately exist in international law,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said during a visit to the Netherlands in 2023.
There are still significant issues to be worked out, including how the tribunal will be paid for and where it will be located. The Netherlands, home to the ICC, the International Court of Justice and other judicial organizations, has offered to host the tribunal.
It is already home to the International Center for Prosecution of the Crime of Aggression, which supports evidence-gathering for a future tribunal and is overseen by the European Union’s judicial cooperation agency, Eurojust. The Council of Europe-backed register of damages, which allows Ukrainian victims of war to catalog the financial harm they have suffered, is also based in the Netherlands.
The tribunal will be established under Ukrainian law, which leaves the future court unable to prosecute the so-called troika, consisting of a country’s head of state, head of government and foreign affairs minister. International law grants that trio immunity while they are in office.
The ICC, which isn’t limited by immunity, has issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin and several military leaders for war crimes.
The Council of Europe aims to get the tribunal up and running by the end of the year.

 

 


Superintelligent AI could replace human researchers, experts suggest

Updated 05 February 2025
Follow

Superintelligent AI could replace human researchers, experts suggest

  • AI opens new horizons in hypothesis generation, data analysis, Riyadh panel hears
  • Global Healthspan Summit discusses ethical implications surrounding AI in healthcare

RIYADH: Experts at a Riyadh conference on Wednesday tackled the question of whether human researchers will become obsolete in the face of superintelligent machines capable of making groundbreaking discoveries.

A panel discussion during the Global Healthspan Summit, which has Arab News as a media partner, brought together specialists to explore the potential of artificial intelligence in scientific research.

The session, titled “AI — The Greatest Scientist in Waiting?” challenged the scientific community by positing that the new technology could surpass human capabilities in hypothesis generation, experimental design, and data analysis.

Two prominent contributors, Dr. Christoph Benn, director of the JLI Center for Global Health Diplomacy in Switzerland, and Jamie Heywood, CEO and founder of Alden Scientific in the US, took part in the discussion, which was moderated by Dr. Jens Eckstein, investment partner at the Hevolution Foundation in Saudi Arabia.

Heywood opened the conversation by emphasizing the transformative potential of AI.

“Mathematics and data techniques are not particularly new. What changes is the amount of data and the computational power we can apply to it,” he said.

Modern scientific method, when combined with AI, allows researchers to ask more nuanced questions, Heywood said.

Rather than relying on generalized clinical trials, researchers can now tailor inquiries to individual circumstances, thus enhancing the relevance and applicability of findings.

Heywood explained: “With enough variables and carefully designed queries, we can answer critical questions like: What will help me? What might be harmful? How will a change in my life, whether it be a diet or medication, feel?”

Such personalized insights would not be feasible without the integration of modern AI technologies, he added.

However, Heywood also cautioned against the pitfalls of AI, particularly the “garbage in, garbage out” phenomenon.

He explained that while machine learning can generate valuable insights, it is also susceptible to errors if the underlying data is flawed or misinterpreted.

“Machine learning can correct for seasonality errors in data, but it can also produce spurious correlations that traditional scientific methods might not catch,” he warned.

For instance, he recounted how the UK Biobank data suggested a correlation between vitamin D and aging that contradicted prior knowledge, highlighting the importance of critical oversight in AI-assisted research.

Benn echoed these comments, stressing the necessity of using AI responsibly in the context of personalized medicine.

“Is it possible to do modern medicine effectively without machine learning? I’m not even sure,” he said.

Benn said that the complexities of modern health data — comprising thousands of variables — are beyond the capacity of human intuition alone.

“Humans can intuit some relationships, but we can’t analyze data at that level,” he said.

The discussion also explored the ethical implications and regulatory needs surrounding AI in healthcare.

Benn pointed out the importance of establishing frameworks to ensure that AI tools are validated and certified.

“We need to trust these tools, both from the consumer’s perspective and from researchers,” he said.

He shared concerns raised by researchers who were hesitant to market their AI innovations without a clear certification process and accountability measures in place.

“Unless we know whether there is a certification process and whether we will be held accountable for unintended side effects, we will not market our AI tools.”

As the panel concluded, the conversation highlighted a critical juncture for the scientific community, noting that the integration of AI into research has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of health and disease, but also necessitates careful consideration of ethical and regulatory frameworks.