The movers and shakers: Who will Pakistan choose?

1 / 4
An election billboard featuring an image of Pakistani cricketer turned politician Imran Khan (top C) of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf is pictured over a street ahead of the general election in Rawalpindi on July 23, 2018. (AFP)
Updated 24 July 2018
Follow

The movers and shakers: Who will Pakistan choose?

  • Pakistanis will go to the polls on Wednesday to elect the 342-seat National Assembly
  • Nawaz Sharif has been barred from holding public office following his ouster last July

KARACHI: With more than 100 million people registered to vote in Pakistan’s general election on Wednesday, a large number are expected to cast a ballot for or against the “movers and shakers” of the country’s political system.

Although Pakistan’s establishment will allegedly have a decisive say in the formation of the future government, and this general election has already being tainted by allegations of pre-poll rigging and maneuvering, we have selected several important political figures who still matter in this political system.

1 Imran Khan: Can’t wait to become PM

After running a long anti-corruption and reform drive, Imran Khan, a 65-year-old cricketer-cum-politician, is restlessly waiting for the result, which he claims will take him to Prime Minister House, from where he will steer the country towards educational, police and economic reforms. Khan, who formed Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on April 25, 1996, a few years after he brought the World Cup title home, had several attempts before making a mark in the 2013 elections.

2 Asif Ali Zardari: The man behind the scenes

Asif Ali Zardari, former president of Pakistan, though rarely seen in the forefront, is believed to be directing the PPP’s election campaign from behind the scenes. On Saturday, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) declared Zardari as an absconding accused in a money laundering case. Earlier, the FIA had found him along with his sister involved in laundering Rs35million. Zardari hadn’t contested the general elections of 2002, 2008 and 2013. He became president of Pakistan after his party won the general election in 2008 and formed a coalition government.
Analysts say since Zardari has been accused of corruption he took a back seat, leaving the front seat for his son, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari.

3 Bilawal Bhutto Zardari: Resuming his mother’s journey

Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, 30, is chairman of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP). The son of former prime minister Benazir Bhutto, who was assassinated during the course of her election campaign on December 27, 2007, he is resuming the unfinished journey of his mother. “You had stood by Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, you had stood by Benazir Bhutto, and you have come out for me. I am expecting you to support me with same zeal in this and future elections,” Bilawal would say to people who would welcome him during his road drive around Pakistan that he kicked off on July 2. As this correspondent was accompanying him through Sindh, he never mentioned the name of his father, former Pakistan president Asif Ali Zardari, during his speeches in different cities and towns. Analysts say that even if Bilawal fails to win a majority, he will be able to protect his party from collapse.

4 Shehbaz Sharif: The last of the Sharifs

Shehbaz Sharif, the former chief minister of Punjab who became president of the Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PML-N) after the disqualification of his elder brother, former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, is going through a rough patch. Whereas some criticize him for not fully supporting his brother and accuse him making his own way, others criticize him for standing with his disqualified brother.
Sharif has established himself as one of the successful chief ministers and often cites his development works and peacemaking efforts to win this year’s general elections. However, the National Accountability Bureau actions and court rulings against his party’s candidates have narrowed the lane towards PM House for him.

5 Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan: The invisible power

Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan is contesting as an independent candidate with the symbol of Jeep, sarcastically attributed to those having close ties with security institutions, from two national and two Punjab assembly seats. The former interior minister, who some see as a potential contender for premiership, will easily make it to both national and provincial assemblies and may emerge as a candidate for PM if PTI fails to win a decisive majority.
Nisar last week said Sharif was in hot water because he ignored his warning against clashes with the establishment.

6 Syed Mustafa Kamal: A rebellion that shackled Altaf’s reign

Syed Mustafa Kamal, who rose to fame as mayor of the megacity of Karachi, was not the first one to defect from Altaf Hussain, founder of the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM), a party of Indian immigrants. However, he was the first one to organize a party, the Pak Sarzameen Party (Pakistan Homeland Party), which he launched along with Anees Qaimkhani in March 2016 and can challenge the MQM-P, a faction which disowned Altaf, and MQM-L, a group still run by Altaf Hussain from London.
Kamal is confident he will become an alternative for the Mohajir voters, whom, he says, Hussain has been exploiting. “We have a contest with PPP on three seats; on the rest we have already won,” Kamal told Arab News in an earlier interview.
The political observers, however, are unable to predict Karachi’s results, because the first fear-free elections have left it unpredictable.

7 Sirajul Haq: Jamaat-e-Islami’s reformist

Sirajul Haq, chief of Jamaat-e-Islami and vice-president of the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA), is contesting his first general election as chief. Haq himself got elected as a member of the provincial assembly in 2002 and was made senior minister of finance; however, his party boycotted the next general election of 2008. In 2013, JI announced a midday boycott in Karachi. In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, however, Haq’s party formed a coalition government with PTI, which continued for a little less than five years. By entering into an alliance with Maulana Fazlur Rehman-led Jamiat Ulama-e-Islam – Fazal, the JI emir is trying to revive his party.

8 Fazlur Rehman: Close to the corridors of power

Fazlur Rehman, chief of Jamiat Ulama-e-Islam – Fazal (JUI-F), who became president of the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA) in March earlier this year, is known for the art of entering into the corridors of power. Although his party hasn’t won a majority of seats after the 2002 election, when Rehman’s relative and party leader Akram Khan Durrani was made chief minister, the JUI-F chief has been able to get his share in power with the help of whatever number of lawmakers he had.

9 Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui: Fighting a war of survival

Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui was made convener of the Muttahida Qaumi Movement – Pakistan (MQM-P) after a rift between Farooq Sattar-led PIB and Amir Khan-led Bahadurabad factions. Siddiqui, who started his political career with the All Pakistan Mohajir Student Organization (APMSO), the student wing of the MQM, was elected as convener amid several challenges, including an internal rift, the emergence of a strong opponent in the form of the Mustafa Kamal-led PSP and boycott calls from London. He, however, was able to convince Farooq Sattar to join him for better results. The 55-year-old chief of MQM-Pakistan is striving to retain the maximum number of seats his party had won under the leadership of Altaf Hussain.


UK union leaders say Met police charges against Palestine activists an attack on right to protest

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

UK union leaders say Met police charges against Palestine activists an attack on right to protest

  • In January, the Metropolitan Police arrested over 70 people in a pro-Palestine protest, including several prominent activists
  • Union leaders called for the Met to drop charges against former NEU executive member, general secretary of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament

LONDON: Over 20 prominent union leaders in the UK have raised concerns about the erosion of the right to peaceful protest in the country and about the Metropolitan Police’s handling of pro-Palestinian marches.

The 22 trade union leaders criticized in a joint statement on Tuesday the Met’s decision to charge former union members who were arrested during a London protest in solidarity with Palestine.

The Met arrested over 70 people in a pro-Palestine protest on Jan. 18 in London. Among those detained were Alex Kenny, a former executive member of the National Education Union; Sophie Bolt, the general secretary of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament; Ben Jamal, the director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign; and Chris Nineham, the vice-chair of the Stop the War Coalition.

The union leaders referred to the arrests and charges against Kenny and Bolt as a threat to the right to protest.

“Alex Kenny is a long-standing, and widely respected, trade union activist who has organised peaceful demonstrations in London for decades,” they said in a statement.

“We believe these charges are an attack on our right to protest. The right to protest is fundamental to trade unions and the wider movement. The freedoms to organise, of assembly and of speech matter; we must defend them,” they added.

They called for the Met to drop charges against Kenny, Bolt, Nineham, and Jamal.

The signatories include Paul Nowak from the Trades Union Congress, Christina McAnea from Unison, Daniel Kebede from the NEU, Matt Wrack from the Teachers’ Union, Dave Ward of the Communication Workers Union, Mick Whelan of the train drivers’ union ASLEF, and Eddie Dempsey from the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers.

They said the decision to charge Kenny and Bolt follows the prosecution of Nineham and Jamal.

Amnesty International, along with dozens of legal experts, expressed concerns over the Met’s handling of the pro-Palestine protest in January, with some describing the arrests as “a disproportionate, unwarranted and dangerous assault on the right to assembly and protest.”

At the protest, former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and former shadow chancellor John McDonnell were interviewed under caution and released pending further investigations. MPs and peers have also called on Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to review protest legislation introduced by the former Conservative government.


Europeans open to buying US arms for Ukraine under Trump plan but need details 

Updated 15 July 2025
Follow

Europeans open to buying US arms for Ukraine under Trump plan but need details 

  • “Of course we can’t do it on our own, we need others to partner up,” Rasmussen told reporters
  • European ministers said they would now need to examine how new purchases of US weapons could be paid for

BRUSSELS: Several European countries said on Tuesday they were willing to buy US arms for Ukraine under a scheme announced by US President Donald Trump, although arrangements still needed to be worked out.

Trump said on Monday that Washington will supply Patriot air defense systems, missiles and other weaponry to Ukraine for its war against Russia’s invasion and that the arms would be paid for by other NATO countries.

But much remains undisclosed, including the amounts and precise types of weapons to be provided, how quickly they would be supplied and how they would be paid for.

US officials have suggested that European countries will be willing to give up some of their own stocks of weapons for Ukraine and then buy replacements from the United States. But some of the countries involved say they still don’t even know what is being asked of them.

Such a move would get weapons to Ukraine more quickly but would leave donor countries’ defenses more exposed until new systems are ready.

“We are ready to participate. Of course we can’t do it on our own, we need others to partner up – but we have a readiness,” Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen told reporters in Brussels on Tuesday ahead of a meeting of European Union ministers.

Speaking alongside Trump at the White House on Monday, NATO chief Mark Rutte said that Germany, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Canada want to be part of the new initiative.

Many of those countries have been among the biggest military aid donors to Ukraine, either overall or per capita.

Asked whether Denmark could give US arms from its own stocks as part of the scheme, Rasmussen said: “We don’t have these kind of systems – the Patriot systems – so if we should lean in, and we are absolutely ready to do so, it will be (with) money and we have to work out the details.”

European ministers said they would now need to examine how new purchases of US weapons could be paid for. In many cases, that seems likely to involve countries teaming up to buy US weapons systems.

“Now we need to see how together we can go in and finance, among other things, Patriots, which they plan to send to Ukraine,” Sweden’s Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard told Swedish radio.

In Brussels, Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp said his country is looking into the plan “with a positive inclination”.

Asked about the scheme, Norwegian Defense Minister Tore Sandvik told Reuters that Oslo was “in close dialogue with Ukraine” on military aid and “air defense remains a high priority for Ukraine and for the Norwegian military support”.

“Norway has contributed to significant amounts of air defense for Ukraine, including co-financing the donation of a Patriot system and missiles,” he said.

The Finnish Defense Ministry said Helsinki “will continue to provide material support to Ukraine”.

“The details of the US initiative ... are not yet known and we are interested to hear more about them before we can take more concrete lines on this issue,” it said.


Air India crash: Pilot groups push back against human error narrative

Updated 15 July 2025
Follow

Air India crash: Pilot groups push back against human error narrative

  • Initial probe finds aircraft’s engine fuel switches were turned off, but does not specify by whom
  • Pilots reject report as ‘inconclusive,’ say it leads media and public to ‘jump to conclusions’

NEW DELHI: Associations of Indian pilots are rejecting claims that last month’s Air India plane crash that killed 260 people was due to human error, after a preliminary investigation sparked speculation implicating the flight crew.

The London-bound Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner crashed less than a minute after taking off from Ahmedabad airport in the western Indian state of Gujarat on June 12.

A report released over the weekend by India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau said that seconds after take-off, both of the plane’s fuel-control switches moved to the position stopping fuel from the engines.

It did not specify who turned off the switches, only citing the cockpit voice recording, in which “one of the pilots is heard asking the other why he cut off,” while “the other pilot responded that he did not do so.”

The Indian Commercial Pilots Association and the Airline Pilots’ Association of India have issued statements after the release of the initial findings — and the first media and online reactions to it — rejecting speculative narratives and presumptions over the guilt of the pilots.

Capt. Kishore Chinta, an ALPA member and accident investigator, told Arab News that both associations have “raised red flags on the selective release of information” by the AAIB, which has “left the scope of ambiguity for people to jump to conclusions” and for the media to spin narratives.

0 seconds of 1 minute, 8 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
01:08
01:08
 

“We are left defending those pilots who are not there to defend themselves,” he said. “The Western media has been painting them as if they actually committed suicide-murder.”

The London-bound flight was carrying 242 people — 230 passengers, two pilots and 10 crew members. Only one person, sitting in an emergency exit seat, survived the crash. Another 18 people were killed on the ground as the aircraft fell on a B. J. Medical College and hostel for students and resident doctors of the Ahmedabad Civil Hospital.

Investigators at the crash site recovered both components of the black box — the cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder, days after the crash. The Ministry of Civil Aviation said at the time that the final report was expected within three months.

The early release of preliminary findings has shaken the Indian aviation community, for which it was unacceptable that experienced pilots who have flown thousands of hours would have turned off the fuel supply.

“Definitely a malfunction caused the disaster — poor maintenance or a hardware/software glitch,” said Sandeep Jain, an Indian aviator based in the US.

“Dead pilots are always the easiest target. They don’t bite back. No litigation, no shareholder value erosion.”

The Federation of Indian Pilots is planning to raise the consequences of the preliminary report with the government.

“We will be taking it up with the government no doubt. We will not let it go quietly. The report should not be open-ended,” Capt. C.S. Randhawa, the federation’s president, told Arab News.

“It is inconclusive. So many things are not answered properly. The report does not say that the pilots have moved the fuel control switches, that is why it is inconclusive, and it is leading to speculations.”


Ukraine’s prime minister Shmyhal resigns

Updated 15 July 2025
Follow

Ukraine’s prime minister Shmyhal resigns

  • Zelensky nominated First Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko for the post

KYIV: Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal said on Tuesday he had filed a resignation letter, as a part of a major governmental reshuffle expected this week.

President Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday nominated First Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko for the post.


Philippines to strengthen migrant workers’ protection in labor deal with Oman

Updated 15 July 2025
Follow

Philippines to strengthen migrant workers’ protection in labor deal with Oman

  • Philippines, Oman plan to sign new MoU on labor cooperation in January
  • Muscat also wants to boost ties beyond labor, explore business opportunities

MANILA: The Philippines is strengthening labor cooperation with Oman to protect the rights and welfare of Filipino workers, its Department of Migrant Workers said following a meeting with the Omani labor minister in Manila.

The majority of over 2 million overseas Filipinos live and work in Gulf countries. 

While most are based in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, some 50,000 are in Oman, contributing over $340 million in annual remittance inflows to the Philippines. 

Oman’s Foreign Minister Sayyid Badr Al-Busaidi and Labor Minister Mahad bin Said Ba’awin were in the Philippines earlier this week to discuss ways to further relations.  

In a meeting with Philippine Migrant Workers Secretary Hans Leo Cacdac on Monday, they held talks over a new agreement on labor cooperation. 

“A key highlight of the meeting was the pending Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on Labor Cooperation, set to be signed by January 2026,” the department said in a statement. 

“The MOU establishes safeguards for Filipino workers through ethical recruitment standards, fair employment terms, joint dispute resolution mechanisms, and regular monitoring through a bilateral Joint Committee.” 

According to the DMW, Oman is “actively seeking Filipino domestic workers technicians, port staff, and other skilled professionals,” which could mean new employment pathways for Filipino migrant workers who are qualified. 

The Philippines is also seeking to incorporate technology to streamline recruitment and deployment of overseas Filipino workers to Oman. 

“By forging digital partnerships with host countries like Oman, we can make recruitment faster, more transparent, and more worker-friendly. Tech solutions can ensure every step is secure, accountable, and focused on protecting OFWs,” Cacdac said.

While labor relations have been a key aspect of Philippine-Omani ties, the Gulf state is now seeking to also explore business and investment opportunities with Manila. 

“For many decades, Oman has been a popular destination for overseas Filipino workers, who have found not just employment but a second home in our country,” Al-Busaidi said at the inaugural Oman-Cebu Investment Forum over the weekend. 

“Beyond the labor relations that have long defined our relations, we now open our arms to the business communities and investors of both our nations.”

A “new chapter” of Philippine-Oman relations is possible thanks to the connections created by Filipino migrant workers, he added, while urging Philippine and Omani businesses to collaborate. 

“Together, we can craft a future where the thousands of people to people connections created by the overseas Filipino workers can serve as a foundation for a flourishing economic partnership, and a new era of mutual investment,” Al-Busaidi said. 

“I invite you all to seize this opportunity and make it a beautiful and rewarding new chapter in the story of Oman and the Philippines.”