Pakistan goes to the polls amid allegations of electoral meddling

Pakistani election staff carry polling material to stations at a distribution center in Islamabad, Pakistan, on the eve of Pakistan national election on Wednesday. (AP Photo/B.K. Bangash)
Updated 25 July 2018
Follow

Pakistan goes to the polls amid allegations of electoral meddling

  • Opinion polls suggest that Imran Khan’s PTI and Nawaz Sharif’s PML-N are neck and neck
  • Concerns about manipulation of the media, targeting of Khan’s opponents and intimidation of Sharif loyalists

LAHORE: Polls have opened in Pakistan for an election that marks only the second transition between civilian governments in the country. However, the significance of such a landmark moment is likely to be lost on some voters who have little faith in the democratic process due to widespread allegations of electoral manipulation.

After 23 years prowling the margins of Pakistani politics, most analysts and opinion polls predict great success for cricketing hero-turned-politician Imran Khan, whose Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party is expected to win the most seats.

Support for Khan, Pakistan’s most famous ladies man and biggest crossover sports celebrity, has surged in the past 18 months due to the corruption trial of ousted former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, head of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), over the purchase of upscale London flats using offshore accounts.

Though Sharif was convicted and is now in jail, Wednesday’s election is still expected to be a close-fought battle between his PML-N and Khan’s PTI.

“The day belongs only to Imran Khan, there is no question about it,” said Fawad Chaudhry, a PTI spokesman.

That might prove to be true but there is mounting evidence that it has not come about without electoral manipulation, including selective targeting of Khan’s opponents, intimidation of Sharif loyalists to force them to defect to PTI, and pressure on the Pakistani media to mute any coverage critical of Khan or the army.

“Over the past few months, we’ve watched the establishment deploy old and new tactics to politically engineer these elections,” said Madiha Tahir, a Pakistan specialist at Columbia University. “At least military coups were honest — we knew what was happening. What we’ve seen in this election cycle is intense obfuscation.”

The military, which ruled Pakistan for about half its 71-year-old history, denies it has interfered in the campaigning.

Although almost 200 people have been killed in militant attacks during the run-up to the election, polling day is expected to be free of violence, with 371,000 troops, three times more than in 2013, set to be deployed outside and inside polling stations as 105 million Pakistanis cast their votes.

Whoever emerges victorious, the new government will have its hands full dealing with a host of problems, including water shortages, a currency crisis and plummeting foreign currency reserves that threaten to send Pakistan knocking on the doors of the International Monetary Fund looking for yet another bailout. Matters are made worse by the enduring threat posed by the Taliban and Daesh militants, and thorny relationships with long-time ally the US and neighboring rivals India and Afghanistan.

If, as expected, no party wins a clear majority, the people of Pakistan will have to brace themselves for weeks of political haggling to assemble what is likely to be a weak coalition government that will have trouble pushing through badly needed reforms. To complicate matters, Khan, who is known for his fiery stubbornness, has repeatedly stated he is wary of entering any governing alliance with either of the established parties, which he considers ultra corrupt: PML-N and the Pakistan People’s Party, which is led by Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, the 29-year-old son of assassinated former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto.

“The major question is will July 25 produce a government united and strong enough to rule Pakistan decisively and push reforms or will it be so weak and divided that it can neither make policies nor be able to rule without interference from unelected forces,” said lawyer and columnist Babar Sattar.

Michael Kugelman, a South Asia specialist at the Woodrow Wilson Center, said a fractious, divided government “raises the possibility that the military could broaden its portfolio.”

Voters on Wednesday will elect 272 members of the National Assembly. To win a simple majority, a party needs to take at least 137 seats. A further 70 seats, mostly reserved for women and members of non-Muslim minorities, are allocated to the parties on the basis of their performance in the contested constituencies, and so to have an overall majority of the 342 total seats, one party needs to have at least 172 of them.

“I’m not scared, I’m really excited to be a part of something new,” said 23-year-old Mustafa Ameer. He is a student in Lahore, the capital of Pakistan’s richest and most populous province, Punjab, which is the heart of Sharif’s power base. “We have had the same corrupt rulers for too long and I can’t wait to vote for change.”

Khan is confident he will make gains in Punjab, which accounts for 141 of the elected seats, but PML-N could ride a wave of sympathy due to the drama surrounding Sharif’s recent return to Pakistan with his daughter, Maryam, to face their conviction and jail sentences over corruption charges, while leaving his ailing wife behind in London.

Ahsan Iqbal, who held the joint portfolio of planning and interior minister in Sharif’s last Cabinet, said PML-N had delivered on its promises to increase economic growth, reduce energy shortages and terrorist attacks, and improve the state of the education sector.

“That is why I am very hopeful that tomorrow the world will see that despite the manipulation of this election, the result will reflect the people’s voice,” he said. “The PML-N will still emerge as the largest party.”

Opinions polls suggest Khan is gaining ground, however, with one survey showing PTI pulling ahead of PML-N and another placing it only slightly behind.

The PPP is in third place.

Though support for the party has slumped considerably in recent years, and its support is now mostly concentrated in the southern Sindh province, the young and charismatic Zardari has energized the election with a strong, issues-based campaign centered on human and minority rights.

“His message is unapologetically inclusive and progressive in a deeply polarized national discourse fueled by deep wells of hate and intolerance,” said Sherry Rehman, leader of the opposition in the senate and a senior PPP figure.

The candidates for Wednesday’s vote also feature a bumper crop of ultra-Islamist groups. Many of them are militant-linked and were reportedly persuaded by the army to abandon their violent history and enter the political mainstream to contest elections as potential spoilers for the PML-N. The army denies these allegations.

“Allowing terrorists and extremists who have been responsible for so many deaths to come into the mainstream without any process of disarmament, deradicalization, re-education and public pledges of non-violence will only polarize the public even more and lead to fiery confrontations either just before or after the elections,” said Pakistani author Ahmed Rashid.


Russian air defenses down 13 Ukrainian drones in 30 minutes, ministry claims

Updated 9 sec ago
Follow

Russian air defenses down 13 Ukrainian drones in 30 minutes, ministry claims

Russia’s Defense Ministry said air defense units had destroyed 13 Ukrainian drones within a space of 30 minutes late on Friday.
A ministry statement on Telegram said that between 10 p.m. and 10.30 p.m. (1900-1930 GMT), nine drones were destroyed in Rostov region on Ukraine’s eastern border and four in Kursk region, on Ukraine’s north border.

 

 

 


European countries vow billions in military support for Ukraine as US envoy meets Putin

Updated 43 min 12 sec ago
Follow

European countries vow billions in military support for Ukraine as US envoy meets Putin

  • British Defense Secretary John Healey said that new pledges of military aid totaled over 21 billion euros ($24 billion)
  • Ukraine has endorsed a US ceasefire proposal, but Russia has effectively blocked it by imposing far-reaching conditions

BRUSSELS: European countries vowed Friday to sends billions of dollars in further funding to help Ukraine keep fighting Russia’s invasion, as a US envoy pursued peace efforts in a trip to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin amid growing questions about the Kremlin’s willingness to stop the more than three-year war.
Russian forces hold the advantage in Ukraine, with the war now in its fourth year. Ukraine has endorsed a US ceasefire proposal, but Russia has effectively blocked it by imposing far-reaching conditions. European governments have accused Putin of dragging his feet.
“Russia has to get moving” on the road to ending the war, US President Donald Trump posted on social media. He said the war is “terrible and senseless.”
In Russia, the Kremlin said Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff met with Putin in St. Petersburg. Witkoff, who has been pressing the Kremlin to accept a truce, initially met with Putin envoy Kirill Dmitriev, footage released by Russian media showed.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Witkoff during his visit to Russia was discussing efforts to end the war with Putin and other officials. “This is another step in the negotiating process toward a ceasefire and an ultimate peace deal,” she said.
Russian state news agency RIA Novosti said Witkoff’s meeting with Putin lasted 4 1/2 hours, and cited the Kremlin as saying that the two discussed “aspects” of ending the war, without providing any details.
After chairing a meeting of Ukraine’s Western backers in Brussels, British Defense Secretary John Healey said that new pledges of military aid totaled over 21 billion euros ($24 billion), “a record boost in military funding for Ukraine, and we are also surging that support to the frontline fight.”
Healey gave no breakdown of that figure, and Ukraine has in the past complained that some countries repeat old offers at such pledging conferences or fail to deliver real arms and ammunition worth the money they promise.
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said last week that Ukraine’s backers have provided around $21 billion so far in the first three months of this year. European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said Friday that more than $26 billion have been committed.
Ahead of the “contact group” meeting at NATO headquarters, Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov said a key issue was strengthening his country’s air defenses.
Standing alongside Healey at the end of it, Umerov described the meeting as “productive, effective and efficient,” and said that it produced “one of the largest” packages of assistance Ukraine has received. “We’re thankful to each nation that has provided this support,” he said.
Britain said that in a joint effort with Norway just over $580 million would be spent to provide hundreds of thousands of military drones, radar systems and anti-tank mines, as well as repair and maintenance contracts to keep Ukrainian armored vehicles on the battlefield.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has renewed his appeals for more Patriot systems since 20 people were killed a week ago, including nine children, when a Russian missile tore through apartment buildings and blasted a playground in his home town.
Zelensky joined Friday’s meeting by video link.
Russia holds off agreeing to ceasefire
The Russian delay in accepting Washington’s proposal has frustrated Trump and fueled doubts about whether Putin really wants to stop the fighting while his bigger army has momentum on the battlefield.
“Russia continues to use bilateral talks with the United States to delay negotiations about the war in Ukraine, suggesting that the Kremlin remains uninterested in serious peace negotiations to end the war,” the Institute for the Study of War, a Washington think tank, said in an assessment late Thursday.
Washington remains committed to securing a peace deal, even though four weeks have passed since it made its ceasefire proposals, State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said.
“It is a dynamic that will not be solved militarily. It is a meat grinder,” Bruce said Thursday about the war, adding that “nothing else can be discussed … until the shooting and the killing stops.”
Observers expect a new Russian offensive
Ukrainian officials and military analysts believe Russia is preparing to launch a fresh military offensive in coming weeks to ramp up pressure and strengthen the Kremlin’s hand in the negotiations.
German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said that his country would provide Ukraine with four IRIS-T short- to medium-range systems with missiles, as well as 30 missiles for use on Patriot batteries. The Netherlands plans to supply a Hawkeye air defense system, an airborne early warning aircraft.
Estonian Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur said that his country is monitoring the world armaments market and sees opportunities for Ukraine’s backers to buy more weapons and ammunition.
Pevkur said he believes Putin might try to reach some kind of settlement with Ukraine by May 9 — the day that Russia marks victory during World War II — making it even more vital to strengthen Kyiv’s position now.
“This is why we need to speed up the deliveries as quickly as we can,” he said.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was absent from the forum that the United States created and led for several years, although he spoke via video.
At the last contact group meeting in February, Hegseth warned Ukraine’s European backers that the US now has priorities elsewhere — in Asia and on America’s own borders — and that they would have to take care of their own security, and that of Ukraine, in future.


Judge says US can deport pro-Palestinian student protester

Updated 11 April 2025
Follow

Judge says US can deport pro-Palestinian student protester

  • Immigration judge rules that Mahmoud Khalil is removable under US immigration law

JENA, United States: An immigration judge ruled Friday that a pro-Palestinian student protester, a US permanent resident detained by the Trump administration, can be deported, US media and a legal rights group said.
Assistant Chief Immigration Judge Jamee Comans said the government had met its burden to prove it had grounds to deport him, Fox News reported.
“An immigration judge ruled immediately after a hearing today that Mahmoud Khalil is removable under US immigration law,” the American Civil Liberties Union said in a statement.
Khalil, a prominent face of the protest movement that erupted in response to Israel’s war in Gaza who is married to a US citizen, was arrested and taken to Louisiana earlier this month, sparking protests. Several other foreign student protesters have been similarly targeted.
Comans had ordered the government to spell out its case against Khalil, who the government is seeking to deport on the grounds that his protest activities are a threat to national security.
In a letter to the court, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio insisted that Khalil’s activism could hurt Washington’s foreign policy.
But he declined to argue formally that the Algeria-born Palestinian student was Hamas-aligned, as officials have told journalists.
The undated letter instead referred to Khalil’s “participation and roles” in allegedly “anti-Semitic protests and disruptive activities which fosters a hostile environment for Jewish students in the United States.”
It made no reference to any alleged crime.
Ahead of the hearing, one of Khalil’s lawyers Marc Van Der Hout said Thursday that he would “be contesting the evidence.”


Chinese president calls on Western countries to support multilateralism

Updated 11 April 2025
Follow

Chinese president calls on Western countries to support multilateralism

  • Xi made no direct mention of Trump or the tariffs totaling 145 percent the US is imposing on Chinese goods, but he referred to “multiple risks and challenges” facing the world that can only be dealt with through “unity and cooperation”

BEIJING: China calls on Western countries to work to support multilateralism and open cooperation, President Xi Jinping told Spain’s visiting Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez on Friday.
“The two sides should promote the building of a fair and reasonable global governance system, maintain world peace and security, and promote common development and prosperity,” Xi told Sanchez at the Diaoyutai State Guest House in Beijing, according to a readout of the meeting by the Xinhua News Agency.
The visit comes at a complex moment for Europe and China. The tariffs announced last week — and then paused — by US President Donald Trump could mean that the European Union pursues more trade with China, the world’s third-largest consumer market after the US and the EU.
Xi made no direct mention of Trump or the tariffs totaling 145 percent the US is imposing on Chinese goods, but he referred to “multiple risks and challenges” facing the world that can only be dealt with through “unity and cooperation.”
Sanchez is making his third trip to the country in two years as his government seeks to boost investment from the Asian giant.
He was also expected to meet with business leaders from several Chinese companies, many of which produce electric batteries or renewable energy technologies.
After meeting Xi, Sanchez said Spain favored “more balanced relations between the EU and China, of finding negotiated solutions to our differences, which we have, and of greater cooperation in common interest.”
He added: “Trade wars are not good, nobody wins. And this is clear; the world needs China and the US to talk.”
Spain’s government spokesperson Pilar Alegría said earlier this week that Sanchez’s trip “has special importance” and is an opportunity to “diversify markets” as Spain faces US tariffs.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent called out Spain for its move toward China, saying on Tuesday that Spain — or any country that tries to get closer to China — would be “cutting their own throat” because Chinese manufacturers will be looking to dump goods that they cannot sell in the US.
“Expanding the trade relations that we have with other countries, including a partner as important as China, does not go against anyone,” Spain’s Agriculture Minister Luis Planas, who is accompanying Sanchez, said in Vietnam on Wednesday.
“Everyone has to defend their interests,” Planas said.
Spain — the euro zone’s fourth-largest economy and a leader in growth — has been less adversarial toward China in recent years than other EU countries.
After initially supporting EU tariffs placed last year on Chinese-made electric vehicles over concerns that they enjoy unfair advantages, Spain abstained from a vote on the proposal.
Planas insisted that Spain’s approach to China “contributes to the collective effort made by certain countries in the European Union to get out of this situation.”
While China’s investments in Spain have grown, the Iberian nation trades less with China than Germany or Italy.
“Spain’s position has changed to be more pro-China ... than the average European country,” said Alicia García-Herrero, an economist for Asia Pacific at the French investment bank Natixis and an expert on Europe’s relations with China.
The Southern European country, which generated 56 percent of its electricity last year from renewable sources, needs Chinese critical raw materials, solar panels, and green technologies — similar to other European countries transitioning from fossil fuels.
In December, Chinese electric battery company CATL announced a €4.1 billion($4.5 billion) joint venture with automaker Stellantis to build a battery factory in northern Spain. That followed deals signed last year between Spain and Chinese companies Envision and Hygreen Energy to build green hydrogen infrastructure in the country.
García-Herrero, the economist at French bank Natixis, stressed the political value of the trip for Sánchez at a time when his leftist minority coalition lacks the support needed to get much passed at home and while Europe may be looking to thaw its strained relations with China.
For Spain, the key thing is “to get a leadership position in Europe at a time when the transatlantic alliance is not only at risk but in shambles,” she said.

 


UN aid chief says to cut 20% of staff due to funding shortfall

UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher delivers a statement in Damascus on December 16, 2024. (AFP)
Updated 11 April 2025
Follow

UN aid chief says to cut 20% of staff due to funding shortfall

  • UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres last month announced a new initiative to improve efficiency and cut costs as the world body turns 80 this year amid a cash crisis

NEW YORK: The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs will cut 20 percent of its staff as it faces a shortfall of $58 million, UN aid chief Tom Fletcher has told staff after OCHA’s largest donor — the US — cut funding.
OCHA “currently has a workforce of around 2,600 staff in over 60 countries. The funding shortfall means we are looking to regroup to an organization of around 2,100 staff in fewer locations,” Fletcher wrote in a note.
OCHA works to mobilize aid, share information, support aid efforts, and advocate for those in need during a crisis. It relies heavily on voluntary contributions.

FASTFACT

The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs mobilizes aid, shares information, supports aid efforts, and advocates for those in need during a crisis.

“The US alone has been the largest humanitarian donor for decades, and the biggest contributor to OCHA’s program budget,” Fletcher said, noting that its annual contribution of $63 million would have accounted for 20 percent of OCHA’s extrabudgetary resources in 2025.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres last month announced a new initiative to improve efficiency and cut costs as the world body turns 80 this year amid a cash crisis.
Fletcher said OCHA would “focus more of our resources in the countries where we work” but would work in fewer places.
OCHA “will scale back our presence and operations in Cameroon, Colombia, Eritrea, Iraq, Libya, Nigeria, Pakistan, Gaziantep (in Turkiye) and Zimbabwe,” Fletcher said.
“As we all know, these exercises are driven by funding cuts announced by member states and not by a reduction of needs,” he said.
“Humanitarian needs are on the rise and have perhaps never been higher, driven by conflicts, climate crises, disease, and the lack of respect of international humanitarian law.”