Victims of Taliban extortion network speak of their ordeals

Despite being flushed out of Pakistan by the security forces, the Taliban has found local criminals to make their extortion demands for them. (REUTERS photo)
Updated 01 August 2018
Follow

Victims of Taliban extortion network speak of their ordeals

  • Chief of Taliban’s Karachi chapter would be primarily tasked to raise funds, a lion’s share of which would come from extorting Pashtun, especially Mehsud traders and contractors, according to senior counter-terrorism official
  • Most extortion calls come from inside Afghanistan and cannot be traced due to the poor capacity of Kabul government.

KARACHI: Siraj Khan, a Peshawar based exporter, is planning to move to Europe with his family. Khan, a nostalgic resident of the city, is not moving abroad because his business is failing at home. He has made billions of rupees by exporting precious minerals from Pakistan’s tribal areas and Afghanistan to the international market. His exports have also contributed to his country’s economy.

His move is prompted, Khan told Arab News, by a surge in extortion calls from Afghanistan.
When Khan bought property in Peshawar’s Hayatabad Industrial Estate (HIE) in 2013 it brought him under the militants’ radar. 
“I got a call and the caller introduced himself as a commander of Mangal Bagh and asked for extortion money,” Khan told Arab News, adding that he paid extortion money not realizing that more and more calls would follow.
“After it became a daily occurrence, I decided to move along with my family to Islamabad,” Khan added, describing how he threw his SIM cards away so that his family could not be reached by militant groups.
When peace began to return to the Peshawar valley and adjacent tribal areas, Khan, who was homesick for Peshawar, decided to move back last December. For four months all was well until a call in March made him realize his error. 
“I made a mistake moving back to Peshawar,” said Khan. Although he informed law enforcement agencies, but he was told that nothing could be done because the calls came from the other side of the Durand line – a border between Pakistan and Afghanistan. “I was advised to take care of myself.”
The calls continued. Meanwhile, Fazlullah was hit by US drone on June 14, but the news that Noor Wali Mehsud, who had been instrumental in expanding Taliban extortion network, had been appointed TTP chief made Khan even more worried. Finally he decided to move to Europe. “I can’t get myself and my children killed,” he said.
No clue
Experts see no end to the calls from Afghanistan. “The Government in Kabul is weak and it cannot even trace the extortion calls, which, along with kidnapping, has become key source of income for its own warlords who were previously getting foreign funding,” Lehaz Ali, a Peshawar-based journalist who specializes in security-related issues, explained.
Although the Taliban have been eradicated by Pakistan security forces, they have found local criminals to execute their extortion plans on their behalf. 
“Local militants and criminal elements now play an important role in execution of the extortion calls”.
Omar Shahid, a senior counter terrorism officer and author of bestsellers on Karachi’s violence, said Karachi chief of Taliban would be primarily tasked to raise funds, a lion’s share of which would come from extorting Pashtun, especially Mehsud traders and contractors.
“With the Taliban network in Karachi now being dismantled and the calls from Afghanistan can’t be executed by TTP, these may certainly be resulting in mental stress for the victims.” 
To have complete control the extortion menace, Shahid suggested, country to country and intelligence agency to intelligence agency cooperation between Pakistan and Afghanistan were needed.
Back to Mehsud
Most of the extortion victims being interviewed by Arab News in Peshawar and Karachi have described being contacted by militants from their own tribes, for instance, a Swati was contacted by a militant from Swat, a Mohmand was called by Mohmand militant, and a Mehsud was phoned by a Mehsud militant for extortion. Thus the appointment of Mehsud as new TTP chief has scared Hajji Mahmudullah, a Mehsud tribal elder, who runs a transport business in Karachi. He said that his insult by Taliban militants still haunts his dreams.
Miserable stories
Mahmudullah’s crime was that he bailed out a community member and left his colleague, a Taliban activist, behind bars. The Taliban, he said, accused him of helping police to arrest a militant and then told him that he could save his life either by brining the militant out of lockup or pay compensation.
After sending Jirga to North Waziristan, Mehsud went to the Taliban’s headquarters. The militants had refused to settle until he visited them. Mahmudullah arrived in Tank and was accompanied by local elders for going to Meeranshah.
“When I entered the room, a commander addressed me and said I would have cut your mustache if you had resisted for one more day,” he recalled. He was made to wait and was insulted in an effort to provoke him, but he controlled his anger.
After an ordeal lasting several days, Mehsud negotiated to pay 2 million rupees and was told he could leave Waziristan once TTP’s man had collected the amount in Karachi. 
“It was really humiliating. I will never even think of doing any good to anyone in future.”
Hajji Mahmudullah is not the only one who is haunted by Taliban’s past.
The eight-year old son of Shah Muhammad Khan, a Karachi-based contractor from Malakand agency, escaped kidnapping four years back. Khan said he had to look to his Mehsud partners after the police refused to help. 
When he visited Quaidabad police station, Khan was told no FIR against Taliban could be lodged. 
“The duty officer, probably, didn’t want to invite the wrath of the Taliban, who had killed two policemen couple of days earlier,” Khan told Arab News. He added that after several months’ negotiation, a settlement was reached that one well-off Mehsud friend of Khan’s would pay 30,000 a month to cover medical treatment for the families of militants.
Local Connections
In most cases the victim has been called by a militant belonging to his tribe.
Muhammad Jamal, a resident of Swat valley, whose brother and son work in the US, was approached for extortion from Kunar, Afghanistan, few months ago. The caller, Jamal said, was a former TTP commander in Swat, who through his local informers had gathered information about him.
Jamal, who lives in Bara Banda, the village of slain TTP chief Mullah Fazlullah, said he is now at ease again as the calls from Afghanistan have come to a halt after the reported death of Fazlullah.
Azmat Khan, a scrap dealer in Karachi and Muhammad Mustaqeem, a trader in Peshawar, said they have paid the Mohmand faction of the Taliban. Both Khan and Mustaqeem belong to Mohmand tribe of Pashtuns.
Ali says businessmen are not the only victims. Several actors and doctors in Peshawar have been targeted and several doctors have been kidnapped in the past, only to secure their freedom after the payment of a hefty ransom.


Al Shabab gunmen attack hotel in central Somalia, seven dead

Updated 23 sec ago
Follow

Al Shabab gunmen attack hotel in central Somalia, seven dead

  • Hours after the initial attack, government forces were trying to flush out Al Shabab fighters, some of whom had been killed in nearby alleys, said Dahir Amin Jesow, a federal lawmaker from the town, the capital of Hiraan region

MOGADISHU: Al Shabab gunmen killed at least seven people in an attack on Tuesday at a hotel in a central Somali town where local elders and government officials were meeting to discuss how to act against the Islamist militant group, an elder said.
The Al-Qaeda-linked group claimed responsibility for the attack in Beledweyne and said it had killed over 10 people. The attackers forced their way in by setting off explosives at the entrance, said a witness, shopkeeper Ali Suleiman.
Al Shabab frequently launches bombings and gun attacks in the fragile Horn of Africa nation as it tries to topple the government and establish its own rule based on its strict interpretation of Islamic Sharia law.
“So far seven people, including clan elders and their guards, all of them my relatives, died in the hotel. Parts of the hotel are ablaze now and it is not clear if the operation is concluded or not,” clan elder Abdullahi Fidow told Reuters.
“Some say the fighters are still fighting in nearby buildings. The death toll may rise because of the blasts and shooting by the fighters,” he said.
Hours after the initial attack, government forces were trying to flush out Al Shabab fighters, some of whom had been killed in nearby alleys, said Dahir Amin Jesow, a federal lawmaker from the town, the capital of Hiraan region.
In a separate incident, at least 10 people, including eight Al Shabab fighters, were killed in fighting in a village in the Middle Shabelle region in southern Somalia, Ali Farah, a military officer in the village, told Reuters.
State-owned Somali National News Agency reported that President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud was at the airport in Mogadishu to receive the soldiers wounded in the fighting.


Trump administration still plans to eliminate consumer finance bureau, witness says

Updated 42 min 29 sec ago
Follow

Trump administration still plans to eliminate consumer finance bureau, witness says

  • Trump has accused the agency of politicized enforcement and the CFPB has been reviled by conservatives and the financial services industry, which have accused it of overreach and overzealous enforcement actions

President Donald Trump’s administration still plans to fire all workers at the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, effectively neutralizing it, according to witness testimony delivered Tuesday.
The testimony runs counter to CFPB court filings, according to which the agency would continue to exist only in a “streamlined” form, as a judge has temporarily blocked it from continuing with mass dismissals.
However a witness, an agency official who testified Tuesday in a Washington courtroom under a pseudonym for fear of retaliation, said she was privy to conversations with the Office of Personnel Management this month at which officials were still discussing firing all agency workers.
“On the 4th, it was mostly about a cost estimate for the final phase” for firing any remaining workers after as many as 1,200 workers are dismissed, said the witness.
“This was last Tuesday?” asked Deepak Gupta, a lawyer representing an employee union, consumer advocates and others challenging the administration’s moves against the CFPB.
“Yes,” the witness answered, adding that she was unaware of any change in plans to wind down the CFPB entirely.
She appeared under the pseudonym “Alex Doe” and explained that she feared retaliation for providing her testimony.
Representatives for the CFPB and OPM did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Unlike the government position taken in court papers, Trump and billionaire adviser Elon Musk have said the consumer financial watchdog should be eliminated. Trump has accused the agency of politicized enforcement and the CFPB has been reviled by conservatives and the financial services industry, which have accused it of overreach and overzealous enforcement actions.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs have said scrapping the agency in this manner defies the powers of Congress, which created the agency in 2010 and would be the sole authority able to abolish it.
Justice Department lawyers argue that Trump officials have acted within their authority and are working to comply with relevant laws.
The witness also said officials with Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency had pressured CFPB officials in mid-February to proceed more quickly in processing bulk notices of employee firings as a court hearing approached at which a judge could order a halt to the firings.
Lawyers representing the National Treasury Employees Union and others are seeking a court order directing the Trump administration to undo the actions it has taken so far in dismissing about 200 workers, placing remaining staff on leave and canceling service contracts, among other measures. A judge has yet to rule on the matter after two days of testimony.


What to know about Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia protester arrested by ICE and facing deportation

Updated 57 min 28 sec ago
Follow

What to know about Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia protester arrested by ICE and facing deportation

  • Khalil was one of the most visible activists in the protests last spring at Columbia, which also happened on other college campuses around the world
  • A federal judge in Manhattan ordered the government to not deport Khalil until the court has a chance to review the case

NEW YORK: A Palestinian activist who helped lead student protests at Columbia University faces deportation after being arrested over the weekend by federal immigration officials.
Trump has warned that the apprehension of Mahmoud Khalil, a legal permanent resident, represents the “first arrest of many” as his administration cracks down on campus opposition to the war in Gaza. But a federal judge temporarily blocked the 30-year old’s expulsion from the country.
Here’s what you need to know:
What happened?
Khalil was detained Saturday night as he and his wife were returning to their Columbia University-owned apartment in upper Manhattan by officials from the US Department of Homeland Security.
The agents told the couple that Khalil was being detained because his student visa had been revoked.
When his wife provided documents proving he was a green card holder, the agents said that was also being revoked and took him away in handcuffs, according to a lawsuit Khalil’s attorneys filed challenging his detention.
Why is he facing deportation?
The Department of Homeland Security, confirming his arrest Saturday, accused Khalil of leading “activities aligned to Hamas, a designated terrorist organization.”
The White House, elaborating more on its position Tuesday, claimed Khalil organized protests where pro-Hamas propaganda was distributed.
“This administration is not going to tolerate individuals having the privilege of studying in our country and then siding with pro-terrorist organizations that have killed Americans,” said Karoline Leavitt, Trump’s press secretary.
Khalil’s lawyers didn’t immediately respond to the White House’s latest claims.
Who is Mahmoud Khalil?
Khalil was one of the most visible activists in the protests last spring at Columbia, which also happened on other college campuses around the world.
He served as a student negotiator — a role that had him speaking frequently with university officials and the press.
More recently, he was among the pro-Palestinian activists investigated by a new disciplinary body at Columbia University focused on harassment and discrimination complaints.
Khalil completed his master’s degree in public administration at Columbia’s School of International and Public Affairs in December.
What’s his legal status?
Khalil was born and raised in Syria after his Palestinian grandparents were removed from their homeland, according to his lawsuit.
He came to the US on a student visa in 2022 to pursue his graduate studies at Columbia.
Khalil and his wife, who is a US citizen, then married in 2023. He became a legal permanent resident — also known as a green card holder — last year.
Can the government deport green card holders?
Short answer: yes. Green card holders can be deported, but the government has the burden to prove the person is deportable.
Grounds for deportation can range from being convicted of a range of crimes, from murder, assault and burglary to tax evasion, domestic violence and illegal firearms possession, according to Stephen Yale-Loehr, an immigration law expert and retired Cornell Law School professor.
But a legal permanent resident can also be expelled for providing material support to a terrorist group, in which case the government doesn’t need a criminal conviction to bring deportation charges, he said.
“Material support for immigration purposes is much broader than the criminal definition of the term,” Yale-Loehr explained. “For example, people have been deported for simply providing a cup of water or bowl of rice to guerrilla groups, even under duress.”
Where is Khalil?
Khalil is being held at a federal immigration detention facility in a central Louisiana town roughly 170 miles (274 kilometers) northwest of New Orleans.
The Central Louisiana ICE Processing Center in Jena, which is a low-slung complex ringed by barbed wire fences, can hold about 1,160 detainees.
Louisiana became a hub for immigrant detention during the first Trump administration and has nine centers, most of them run by private contractors.
Critics say the isolated complexes cut prisoners off from easy access to attorneys and family.
“The intent is to kind of break the morale, the spirits, of those that are held at these facilities,” Yasmine Taeb, the legislative and political director for the Muslim activist group MPower Change, told reporters Tuesday.
What’s next?
Khalil is expected to make an initial appearance before an immigration court but is unclear when — it could happen anywhere from 10 days to a month, experts told the AP .
Meanwhile, a federal judge in Manhattan ordered the government to not deport Khalil until the court has a chance to review the case. A hearing was tentatively scheduled for Wednesday.
Khalil’s lawyers contend that he has a right to due process as a legal permanent resident and that the government is “engaging in blatant efforts to target and chill” Khalil’s free speech and to “discriminate against particular viewpoints,” in violation of the First Amendment.
They’ve also petitioned the court to have him returned to New York, as his wife is eight months pregnant.
“For everyone reading this, I urge you to see Mahmoud through my eyes as a loving husband and the future father to our baby,” his wife, who has not been named, wrote in a statement provided by his lawyers. “I need your help to bring Mahmoud home, so he is here beside me, holding my hand in the delivery room as we welcome our first child into this world.”
 

 


Macron urges allies to plan ‘credible security guarantees’ for Ukraine

Updated 12 March 2025
Follow

Macron urges allies to plan ‘credible security guarantees’ for Ukraine

  • Macron has teamed up with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer to lead efforts to form a “coalition of the willing” to enforce an eventual ceasefire in Ukraine

PARIS: French President Emmanuel Macron on Tuesday called on military chiefs from across Europe and beyond to draw up a plan “to define credible security guarantees” for Ukraine in the event of a ceasefire, the presidency said.
His appeal, in a closed-door Paris meeting of top brass from more than 30 allied states, came as Ukraine endorsed an American proposal for a month-long ceasefire and agreed to immediate negotiations with Russia, in pivotal talks in Saudi Arabia.
Macron has sought to rally a European response to Washington’s shock policy shift in US-Russia relations.
The Paris meeting gathered representatives from 34 countries — most of them from Europe and NATO, but also from Australia, New Zealand and Japan.
There was no representative from the United States, which is the leading member of NATO.
“This is the moment when Europe must throw its full weight behind Ukraine, and itself,” Macron told the meeting, according to the Elysee.
“In view of the acceleration of peace negotiations,” it was necessary to start planning to “define credible security guarantees” to make a lasting peace in Ukraine a reality, the French presidency reported Macron as saying.
Macron has teamed up with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer to lead efforts to form a “coalition of the willing” to enforce an eventual ceasefire in Ukraine.
According to the Elysee, the military chiefs of staff from European and NATO nations — including Britain and Turkiye — agreed that the security guarantees “should not be separated from NATO and its capabilities.”
Such guarantees should be “credible and long-term, and should be accompanied by unfailing support for the Ukrainian army,” according to the Elysee.
More than three years since Russia invaded its neighbor, Europe is scrambling to boost its defenses and break free from dependence on the United States.
It has been unsettled by Trump renewing contacts with Russian leader Vladimir Putin and criticizing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, raising fears that the US president may try to force Ukraine to accept a settlement favoring Russia.
Trump suspended military aid and intelligence-sharing with Kyiv, though his administration late on Tuesday indicated it would lift the freeze after Ukraine endorsed then American proposal.
Macron later posted on X that “the ball is now clearly in Russia’s court,” and hailed the “progress” made in peace talks in Saudi Arabia.
Ahead of the Paris defense meeting, French Defense Minister Sebastien Lecornu said: “We will reject any form of demilitarization of Ukraine.”
“It is simply a question of looking ahead and thinking about what the Ukrainian army should be in the future,” Lecornu added.
On Friday, the French president, who has pushed his country’s defense industry to switch to “war economy mode,” is set to meet with defense manufacturers, according to a member of his team.
Defense ministers from Europe’s five main military powers — France, Britain, Germany, Italy and Poland — are to meet in the French capital on Wednesday. EU and NATO representatives and the Ukrainian defense minister will also take part.
Those talks will center on the “necessary rearmament of Europe” and military support to Ukraine, one of Lecornu’s aides said.
Starmer will, in turn, host virtual talks on Saturday with leaders of the nations willing to help support the ceasefire.
Macron has said any European troops in Ukraine would be deployed only “once a peace deal is signed, to guarantee it is fully respected.”
He has also said he would be ready to discuss extending France’s nuclear deterrent to European partners.
Last week, EU chief Ursula von der Leyen unveiled a plan to mobilize around 800 billion euros ($843 billion) for Europe’s defense and help provide “immediate” military support for Ukraine.
France also plans to raise defense spending, with Lecornu referring to a target of around 100 billion euros ($109 bn) a year, compared to 50.5 billion euros in 2025.


EU’s top diplomat pledges unified support for Ukraine and global humanitarian aid in dig at US

Updated 12 March 2025
Follow

EU’s top diplomat pledges unified support for Ukraine and global humanitarian aid in dig at US

  • EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas never mentioned the US in her speech to the UN Security Council
  • Her points were clearly aimed at President Donald Trump ‘s dismissive language about Europe

UNITED NATIONS: The European Union has a message for the Trump administration: It will continue supporting Ukraine against Russia’s illegal invasion, step up humanitarian aid when others pull back, and boost global teamwork to address the world’s challenges.
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas never mentioned the United States in her speech to the UN Security Council on Tuesday. But her points were clearly aimed at President Donald Trump ‘s dismissive language about Europe, his massive cutbacks in aid to poor and conflict-torn countries, and his administration’s reluctance to acknowledge that Russia invaded Ukraine.
Following talks in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday, the Trump administration said it was lifting its suspension of military aid and intelligence sharing for Ukraine, and Kyiv signaled that it was open to a 30-day ceasefire in the war with Russia. The US-Ukraine deal is now pending Moscow’s agreement.
Looking at the world 80 years after the UN was founded on the ashes of World War II, Kallas said its foundations are facing “unprecedented pressure.” She cited blatant violations of the UN Charter, “attempts to replace the rule of law by the rule of force,” and universal principles promoting peace, human rights and development “under heavy fire.”
At a news conference afterward, she said, “The world is more dangerous now than it has ever been since the Cold War.”
Kallas told the council, “The EU will remain the UN’s reliable partner of choice” and will defend the UN Charter, which says every country must respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all nations.
That’s why it has supported Ukraine’s right to self-defense and stands with Kyiv “for a just and lasting peace in line with the Charter,” she said, stressing that Russia must lose its “colonial war.”
The EU will always support rising humanitarian needs, with almost 2 billion euros this year, she said, a dig at the Trump administration, which dismantled the US aid agency and is eliminating 83 percent of its programs.
Kallas also stressed the need to boost multilateralism and engage with partners, which “is the only way forward in solving issues.”
She was asked afterward about a Trump comment that the EU was created to destroy the US when it comes to trade and was asked whether the 27-nation bloc could overcome that antagonism.
Surrounded by diplomats from all EU member nations, Kallas replied that the EU is “a peace project” created to ensure there would be no more wars among its members.
Right now, “our relations with third parties around the world show that everybody is looking at us because we are the reliable, predictable partner,” she said. “So, I really see the possibility to grow Europe’s geopolitical presence.”
The EU came under attack from Russia during the Security Council meeting.
After Kallas pledged to continue EU support to Ukraine, Russia’s UN ambassador blasted the European bloc for what it called a long history of anti-Russian sentiment.
“This sensible club aimed at integration, which used to promote cooperation with Russia, has today definitively turned into a fossilized, aggressive Russophobia bloc, which has staked its energy, economic, social and financial wellbeing on a pointless confrontation with its eastern neighbor,” Vassily Nebenzia said.
“Today, more than ever, it’s clear that the EU is seriously losing in this confrontation,” he said.
Kallas retorted that Nebenzia’s comments were a good example of rewriting history and how “misinformation and disinformation” and “lies” must be fought.
She said countries are afraid of Russia because of the countries it has attacked, “and these fears are not ungrounded.”