What We Are Reading Today: The Cognitive Challenge of War: Prussia 1806 by Peter Paret

Updated 15 August 2018
Follow

What We Are Reading Today: The Cognitive Challenge of War: Prussia 1806 by Peter Paret

  • Fields of history that are often kept separate are brought together in this book, which seeks to replicate the links between different areas of thought and action as they exist in reality and shape events

Responding to the enemy’s innovation in war presents problems to soldiers and societies of all times. This book traces Napoleon’s victory over Prussia in 1806 and Prussia’s effort to recover from defeat to show how in one particular historical episode operational analyzes together with institutional and political decisions eventually turned defeat to victory.

The author moves from a comparative study of French and Prussian forces to campaign narrative and strategic analysis. He examines processes of change in institutions and doctrine, as well as their dependence on social and political developments, and interprets works of art and literature as indicators of popular and elite attitudes toward war, which influence the conduct of war and the kind and extent of military innovation. In the concluding chapter he addresses the impact of 1806 on two men who fought on opposing sides in the campaign and sought a new theoretical understanding of war — Henri Jomini and Carl von Clausewitz.

Fields of history that are often kept separate are brought together in this book, which seeks to replicate the links between different areas of thought and action as they exist in reality and shape events.

Peter Paret is professor emeritus at the Institute for Advanced Study. He has written widely on the history of war and society and on the relationship of art, society, and politics. He is the author of Clausewitz and the State (Princeton), now in its third revised edition. Most recently he gave the 2008 Lees Knowles Lectures at Cambridge University, on which this book is based, and was guest curator for the spring 2009 exhibition Myth and Modernity at the Princeton University Art Museum.


What We Are Reading Today: ‘How Birds Evolve’

Photo/Supplied
Updated 05 January 2025
Follow

What We Are Reading Today: ‘How Birds Evolve’

“How Birds Evolve” explores how evolution has shaped the distinctive characteristics and behaviors we observe in birds today.

Douglas Futuyma describes how evolutionary science illuminates the wonders of birds, ranging over topics such as the meaning and origin of species, the evolutionary history of bird diversity, and the evolution of avian reproductive behaviors, plumage ornaments, and social behaviors.

In this multifaceted book, Futuyma examines how birds evolved from nonavian dinosaurs and reveals what we can learn from the “family tree” of birds.

 


What We Are Reading Today: ‘Those Barren Leaves’

Photo/Supplied
Updated 05 January 2025
Follow

What We Are Reading Today: ‘Those Barren Leaves’

Author: Aldous Huxley

Aldous Huxley’s “Those Barren Leaves,” first published in 1925, is a sharp and satirical novel that dissects the pretensions, disillusionments and spiritual emptiness of Europe’s post-First World War intelligentsia.

Set in a luxurious villa in Italy, the novel brings together an eclectic group of characters whose philosophical musings and existential crises form the basis of Huxley’s incisive critique of modernity and culture.

The story revolves around a gathering of wealthy, educated and self-absorbed individuals, including Mrs. Aldwinkle, the owner of the villa and a patron of the arts; Calamy, a romantic aristocrat; and Chelifer, an idealistic poet grappling with his disillusionment. Each character represents a different facet of the intellectual elite, embodying both their allure and their absurdity.

Through their interactions, Huxley exposes the hollowness behind their intellectual posturing and their struggles to find meaning in a world that seems increasingly fragmented and purposeless.

Huxley’s prose is elegant and often biting, filled with sharp observations and wit that make his satire entertaining and thought-provoking. The dialogue crackles with intellectual energy, as the characters debate art, love, philosophy, and the meaning of life.

However, their conversations often reveal more about their own insecurities and contradictions than they do about the subjects they discuss. This duality — the brilliance of their intellects contrasted with the emptiness of their souls — is at the heart of Huxley’s critique.

Beneath the satire, “Those Barren Leaves” grapples with serious themes, including the decline of traditional values, the search for spiritual fulfillment, and the tension between individuality and conformity.

These themes, although specific to the post-war context of the 1920s, remain relevant today, offering a timeless exploration of humanity’s quest for meaning in an increasingly materialistic and secular world.

Yet, the novel is not without its challenges. Its focus on intellectual discourse and philosophical reflection can make it feel dense at times, and the characters, while vividly drawn, are often unsympathetic.

The author’s portrayal of their flaws is so unflinching that it may alienate readers looking for emotional resonance or traditional storytelling. However, for those who appreciate incisive social commentary and richly layered prose, “Those Barren Leaves” is a rewarding read.

Huxley’s ability to combine satire with profound philosophical inquiry elevates the novel, making it a fascinating study of the human condition. While it may not carry the dystopian weight of his later work, “Brave New World,” it offers a glimpse into the evolution of his thought and the concerns that would shape his career.

In “Those Barren Leaves,” Huxley holds up a mirror to his era’s intellectual elite, revealing their triumphs, failures, and unrelenting search for purpose. It is a novel that challenges, provokes and ultimately compels readers to reflect on the complexities of modern existence, offering critique and insight with a mastery that is uniquely Huxley.

 


What We Are Reading Today: The Wishing Game by Meg Shaffer

Updated 04 January 2025
Follow

What We Are Reading Today: The Wishing Game by Meg Shaffer

“The Wishing Game” is a charming mix of playfulness, emotion, and nostalgia, according to PrincetonBookReview.com.

The book takes readers to the magical Clock Island, where the boundaries between made-up stories and real life are fuzzy, creating an atmosphere of whimsical fun and intrigue.

Lucy, a woman on a quest for meaning in her life, is easy to relate to and instantly likable. Her bond with Christopher, a young boy full of promise, forms the story’s heart, drawing readers in with its emotional depth.


What We Are Reading Today: South Sudan: The Untold Story

Updated 04 January 2025
Follow

What We Are Reading Today: South Sudan: The Untold Story

Author: Hilde F. Johnson

South Sudan was granted independence and became the world’s newest country. Yet just two-and-a-half years after this momentous decision, the country was in the grips of renewed civil war and political strife.  

In this book, Hilde F. Johnson provides an unparalleled insider’s account of South Sudan’s descent from the ecstatic celebrations of July 2011 to the outbreak of the disastrous conflict in December 2013 and the early, bloody phase of the fighting.

Johnson’s personal and private contacts at the highest levels of government, accompanied by her deep knowledge of the country and its history, make this a unique eyewitness account of the turbulent first three years of the world’s newest – and yet most fragile – country.


What We Are Reading Today: ‘Friction’ by Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing

Updated 03 January 2025
Follow

What We Are Reading Today: ‘Friction’ by Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing

Anthropologist Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing challenges the widespread view that globalization invariably signifies a clash of cultures, developing friction as a metaphor for the diverse and conflicting social interactions that make up our contemporary world.

Focusing on the social drama of the Indonesian rainforests in the 1980s and 1990s, she shows how a host of competing interests—from environmentalists and North American investors to advocates for Brazilian rubber tappers, international funding agencies, and village elders—are drawn into unpredictable, messy misunderstandings, but misunderstandings that sometimes work out.