WASHINGTON: US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Sunday did not back President Donald Trump’s assertion that tariff talks with China were under way and said he did not know if the US president had talked to Chinese President Xi Jinping.
The Trump administration signaled openness last week to de-escalating a trade war between the world’s two largest economies that has raised fears of recession. Trump himself has said talks on tariffs were taking place with China and that he and Xi have spoken.
Yet Beijing has denied that any trade talks are occurring.
Bessent, a key player in US trade talks with multiple countries, said that he had interactions with his Chinese counterparts last week during International Monetary Fund meetings in Washington, but did not mention tariffs.
“I had interaction with my Chinese counterpart, but it was more on the traditional things like financial stability, global economic early warnings,” he said on ABC’s “This Week.”
“I don’t know if President Trump has spoken with President Xi,” Bessent added. “I know they have a very good relationship and a lot of respect for each other.”
Asked why the Chinese were denying talks, Bessent said. “I think they’re playing to a different audience.”
Bessent, who said last week that tariff negotiations with Beijing would be a “slog,” did not give a timetable for any potential agreement with China.
He said a trade deal can take months, but a de-escalation and an agreement in principle can be achieved sooner and would keep tariffs from ratcheting back to the maximum level.
Trump’s erratic, and often confusing, rollout of tariffs has hit many countries including the largest US trading partners, like Canada, Mexico and China. The result has been almost unprecedented market volatility and serious damage to investor trust in US assets.
In a separate television interview on Sunday, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said the United States was holding daily conversations with China over tariffs, but did not elaborate.
“Every day we are in conversation with China, along with those other 99, 100 countries that have come to the table,” Rollins said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

KAMPALA: Belgium’s foreign minister said that Rwanda’s “legitimate” security concerns in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo could not justify its former colony’s backing for the M23 armed group.
In an interview, Maxime Prevot urged both sides to negotiate an end to the conflict in the DRC’s troubled east, where the M23 has seized swathes of territory from the Congolese government.
“There will be no military solution in the east of the Congo. We need dialogue,” Prevot said after meeting Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni in the capital Kampala on Friday.
“The situation there remains extremely precarious and the local population pays the price every day,” the minister added, raising concerns of human rights abuses.

“There is an urgent need to act.”
Since the beginning of 2025 the M23 armed group has forced the Congolese army out of swathes of the DRC’s mineral-rich east, triggering a worsening humanitarian crisis and displacing hundreds of thousands.
UN experts and some Western countries have accused Rwanda of backing the M23, whose lightning offensive has raised fears of a regional war.
President Paul Kagame’s government denies offering the M23 military support, but argues it faces threats from armed groups linked to the 1994 Rwandan genocide present in the DRC’s east.
Prevot said Rwanda’s security concerns were understandable, but its actions in the eastern DRC were unacceptable.
“I think that Rwanda, and it is legitimate, is looking for security,” Prevot said.
“But I fully disagree with Rwanda considering the way it is acting in the east of Congo.”
Prevot denied Belgium’s position was linked to its colonial history. Belgium ruled Rwanda and neighboring Burundi from 1916 to 1962.
Rwanda, which according to UN experts maintains 4,000 troops in the DRC to support the M23, severed diplomatic links with Belgium in March because of its stance on the conflict.
“We do not have any feeling of past colonialism regrets,” Prevot said. “And certainly not for me. I have a lot of respect for Rwanda.”
Prevot welcomed mediation efforts by Qatar and the United States between the DRC, the M23 and Rwanda but cautioned against false optimism.
“I hope I’m not being naive with the positive announcements” made this week, the minister said.
The DRC and the M23 issued a statement this week pledging to work toward a ceasefire and to engage in dialogue to end the conflict, with Qatar facilitating the talks.
Responding to suggestions that the parties to the talks were using a lull in the fighting to prepare a further military offensive, Prevot said: “I hope that this is not a kind of smokescreen and that everybody is sincere.”
Prevot acknowledged Belgium’s limited influence, given diplomatic tensions with Rwanda, but said efforts should continue.
“I hope it will be possible in the coming months to reopen, maybe discreetly, maybe informally, communication channels,” the foreign minister said.
“The way Belgium is reacting is not against Rwanda, it’s for the defense of international law, humanitarian law, sovereignty and territorial integrity.”
Kristof Titeca, a Belgian academic specializing in the African Great Lakes region, told AFP that Belgium has played a key role in Europe advocating for sanctions against Rwanda.
But he warned that the situation on the ground remains fragile, while domestic Congolese politics complicated the picture.
“It has become close to impossible for Kinshasa to regain the territories lost to M23 and Rwanda,” Titeca said.
Any outside power hoping to intervene would have “to navigate both Rwanda’s support for M23 and the structural weaknesses in the Congolese political system,” he added.
Titeca said Rwanda’s minimum objective appears to be the establishment of a “buffer zone” in the eastern DRC, either through the M23 or through influence over a local administration.
Following his visit to Uganda, Prevot will continue his tour in Burundi and the DRC.