Furor in India over Trump’s comments

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. (AP)
Updated 24 July 2019
Follow

Furor in India over Trump’s comments

  • Opposition leaders said India’s position was that Kashmir was a bilateral matter with Pakistan and it will not accept any third-party mediation
  • India and Pakistan have fought two wars over Kashmir, the Himalayan territory they both claim that is divided between them

NEW DELHI: Indian government opposition members on Tuesday stormed out of Parliament after a heated session over claims by US President Donald Trump that he had been asked by Prime Minister Narendra Modi to mediate over the Kashmir dispute with Pakistan.

Despite a statement from Minister of External Affairs Subrahmanyam Jaishankar denying the premier’s arbitration request, members demanded Modi appear in person to clarify the situation.

However, mainstream political parties and separatist leaders in Kashmir later welcomed the suggestion of mediation by the US as the only way to put out the “raging fires of hatred” that for years had engulfed the disputed territory.

Denying the claim in Parliament, Jaishankar said: “I would like to put it on record in the house that no such request (on Kashmir) was made by the prime minister to the president of the United States. All issues with Pakistan have and will remain bilateral between India and Pakistan.”

But leader of the main opposition Congress party, Rahul Gandhi, tweeted: “A weak foreign ministry denial won’t do. (The) PM must tell the nation what transpired in the meeting between him and (the) US president.”

He added that if Trump’s claims were found to be true, Modi had “betrayed India’s interests and the 1972 Shimla Agreement (a peace treaty between India and Pakistan).”

Leader of the Congress party in the upper house of the Indian Parliament, Anand Sharma, demanded that Modi “must” explain himself after Trump had reportedly told Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan about the Indian PM’s mediation plea.

Opposition members shouted, “PM come to the house” and “PM must reply” before staging a walkout in both houses of Parliament.

Speaking to media in Washington on Monday, with Khan by his side, Trump said: “I was with prime minister Modi two weeks ago. We talked about this subject (Kashmir). He actually said, ‘would you like to be a mediator or arbitrator?’ I said, ‘Where?’ He said, ‘Kashmir’.... I think they’d like to see it resolved. And I think you’d like to see it resolved. And, if I can help, I would love to be a mediator.”

Trump added: “I think they would like to see it resolved. I think you would like to see it resolved and if I can help, I would like to see it resolved and if I can help, I would love to be a mediator. It is impossible to believe that two incredible countries that are very smart and have very smart leadership can’t resolve it, but if you want me to mediate or arbitrate, I would be willing to do it.”

In a press statement on Tuesday the US State Department said that “while Kashmir is a bilateral issue, the Trump administration welcomes Pakistan and India sitting down and the US stands ready to assist.”

Both India and Pakistan claim Kashmir and they have fought three wars on the issue. In February this year they were on the verge of another war after a terror attack in Pulwama district killed more than 50 members of Indian paramilitary forces. International intervention is believed to have played a major role in diffusing tensions between the neighbors.

India and Pakistan have not held any formal bilateral talks on the subject of Kashmir for more than five years.

Meanwhile, mainstream political parties and separatist leaders in Kashmir have welcomed talk of mediation by the US.

“It is a matter of happiness that when PM Modi talked to Trump he had told him that the Kashmir issue is complex and if there can be some help it would be good,” said Farooq Abdullah, the former chief minister of Jammu and Kashmir and leader of the National Conference, a predominant group in the valley.

“I congratulate Modi. He too wants to use everything to solve this issue that is creating tensions between India and Pakistan,” Abdullah added.

The People’s Democratic Party (PDP), the outgoing ruling party of Kashmir which was a coalition partner of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in Srinagar for two years until June last year, “welcomed the positive development laden with potential to establish permanent peace in the subcontinent.”

In a statement the party added: “Dialogue and diplomacy, not warmongering, are the only means which can deliver some respite to the people of a subcontinent engulfed in raging fires of hatred.”

Kashmir-based separatist group All Parties Hurriyat Conference (APHC) said that “every effort and push” in the resolution of the Kashmir dispute was welcome.

“The US and all other nations can play a role in asking both the neighbors to talk and resolve the festering Kashmir conflict once for all. It will put an end to decades-long political uncertainty, perpetual strife and endless pain and miseries for the people of this ill-fated region,” Hurriyat added in a statement.

Political analyst Prof. Sheikh Showkat Hussain, of Kashmir University, said that mediation was the only solution. “Both the countries were supposed to settle the dispute bilaterally through the Shimla Agreement, but they have failed to do it. Therefore, there is scope for third-party mediation, and I believe Modi has sought that intervention.”

He added: “The way things are unfolding in Afghanistan with the Americans on retreat, if the Western forces leave Afghanistan and the Kashmir issue remains unresolved, then for the non-state actors the center of attention would be the valley.

“I feel that Modi might have approached Trump in that context. He wants to resolve the issue before the Americans leave Afghanistan,” Hussain told Arab News.

Valley-based human rights activist, Khurram Parvez, said the “international community has an important role to play in resolving the issue in Kashmir.”

He told Arab News: “Bilaterally it will be impossible for them to resolve it unless there is international support and persuasion. Bilateral mechanisms have failed. Most conflicts in the world have been solved by international intervention.”


UK and India to resume stalled free trade talks

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

UK and India to resume stalled free trade talks

  • The two countries have spent nearly three years negotiating what would be a milestone for Britain as it continues to seek alternative markets
London: Britain and India will resume stalled talks to agree a free-trade deal, the two countries said after their leaders met at the G20 summit in Brazil.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who took power in London in July, hailed his meeting with Indian counterpart Narendra Modi as “very productive” and vowed that a trade pact with Delhi would boost UK growth.
“A new trade deal will support jobs and prosperity in the UK — and represent a step forward in our mission to deliver growth and opportunity across the country,” he posted on X late Monday.
Hours earlier, Starmer’s office confirmed the two countries would relaunch the talks “in the new year” as Britain sought “a new strategic partnership with India.”
That will include “deepening cooperation in areas like security, education, technology, and climate change,” Downing Street said in a statement summarising the meeting of the two leaders.
India’s foreign ministry said both leaders had “underlined the importance of resuming the Free Trade Agreement negotiations at an early date.”
It added they had “expressed confidence in the ability of the negotiating teams, to address the remaining issues to mutual satisfaction, leading to a balanced, mutually beneficial and forward looking Free Trade Agreement.”
The two countries have spent nearly three years negotiating what would be a milestone for Britain as it continues to seek alternative markets after its departure from the European Union.
UK and India to resume stalled free trade talks
The previous Conservative government, ousted by Starmer’s Labour party in July, had hit several roadblocks in its talks with Delhi over the trade pact.
In exchange for lowering tariffs on British imports such as whisky, India has pushed for more UK work and study visas for its citizens.
But Starmer’s Downing Street predecessor, Rishi Sunak, took an increasingly tough stance on immigration during his 20-month tenure as he faced a backlash over record migration levels in the wake of the Covid pandemic.
His government unveiled a raft of measures in late 2023 aimed at curbing the numbers.
Starmer has prioritized kickstarting anaemic UK economic growth but his administration is also under pressure on the contentious issue.
Britain has secured a number of post-Brexit trade deals, including with Australia, New Zealand and Singapore, and is set to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) next month.
But a much sought-after trade deal with the United States remains elusive, and striking a deal Canada also faltered earlier this year.

Germany sees damaging of Baltic Sea cables as act of sabotage, minister says

Updated 8 min 9 sec ago
Follow

Germany sees damaging of Baltic Sea cables as act of sabotage, minister says

The damaging of two undersea fiber-optic communications cables in the Baltic Sea must be seen as an act of sabotage, although it is still unclear who is responsible, German Defense minister Boris Pistorius said on Tuesday.
“No one believes that these cables were cut accidentally. I also don’t want to believe in versions that these were anchors that accidentally caused damage over these cables,” Pistorius said before a meeting with EU defense ministers in Brussels.
“Therefore we have to state, without knowing specifically who it came from, that it is a ‘hybrid’ action. And we also have to assume, without knowing it yet, that it is sabotage.”


Kyiv urges ‘decisive action’ after report on banned chemical weapons

Updated 13 min 40 sec ago
Follow

Kyiv urges ‘decisive action’ after report on banned chemical weapons

Kyiv: Kyiv on Tuesday blamed Russia and urged action after the international chemical weapons watchdog said banned riot control gas had been found in Ukrainian soil samples from the front line.
Russia and Ukraine have accused each other of using chemical weapons in the conflict, with Kyiv’s Western allies claiming Moscow has employed banned weapons.
“We call on our partners to take decisive action to stop the aggressor and bring those responsible for crimes to justice. True peace can only be achieved through strength, not appeasement,” the foreign ministry said.
“Russia’s use of banned chemicals on the battlefield once again demonstrates Russia’s chronic disregard for international law,” a statement added.
Russia is yet to react to the report by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), which brought the first confirmation of the use of riot control gas in areas where active fighting is taking place in Ukraine.
The OPCW’s Chemical Weapons Convention strictly bans the use of riot control agents including CS, a type of tear gas, outside riot control situations when it is used as “a method of warfare.”
CS gas is non-lethal but causes sensory irritation including to the lungs, skin and eyes.
The evidence handed over by Ukraine to the OPCW enabled it to “corroborate... the chain of custody of the three samples collected from a trench in Ukraine located along the confrontation lines with the opposing troops, had been maintained,” the organization said.
It stressed however that the report did “not seek to identify the source or origin of the toxic chemical.”
OPCW director-general Fernando Arias “expressed grave concern” over the findings.
“All 193 OPCW Member States, including the Russian Federation and Ukraine, have committed never to develop, produce, acquire, stockpile, transfer or use chemical weapons,” he said in a statement.


India to send 5,000 extra troops to quell Manipur unrest

Updated 41 min 26 sec ago
Follow

India to send 5,000 extra troops to quell Manipur unrest

  • Fresh periodic clashes of troubled state located in country’s northeast have killed 16 people so far
  • Manipur rocked by clashes since 18 months between Hindu majority and Christian Kuki community

NEW DELHI: India will deploy an extra 5,000 paramilitary troops to quell unrest in Manipur, authorities said Tuesday, a week after 16 people were killed in fresh clashes in the troubled state.
Manipur in India’s northeast has been rocked by periodic clashes for more than 18 months between the predominantly Hindu Meitei majority and the mainly Christian Kuki community, dividing the state into ethnic enclaves.
Ten Kuki militants were killed when they attempted to assault police last week, prompting the apparent reprisal killing of six Meitei civilians, whose bodies were found in Jiribam district days later.
New Delhi has “ordered 50 additional companies of paramilitary forces to go to Manipur,” a government source in New Delhi with knowledge of the matter told AFP on condition of anonymity, as they were not authorized to speak with media.
Each company of the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF), a paramilitary unit overseen by the home ministry and responsible for internal security, has 100 troops.
The Business Standard newspaper reported that the additional forces would be deployed in the state by the end of the week.
India already has thousands of troops attempting to keep the peace in the conflict that has killed at least 200 people since it began 18 months ago.
Manipur has been subject to periodic Internet shutdowns and curfews since the violence began last year.
Both were reimposed in the state capital Imphal on Saturday after the discovery of the six bodies prompted violent protests by the Meitei community.
The ethnic strife has also displaced tens of thousands of people in the state, which borders war-torn Myanmar. Incensed crowds in the city had attempted to storm the homes of several local politicians.
Local media reports said several homes of lawmakers from Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which governs the state, were damaged in arson attacks during the unrest.
Long-standing tensions between the Meitei and Kuki communities revolve around competition for land and jobs. Rights groups have accused local leaders of exacerbating ethnic divisions for political gain.


Canada foiled Iran plot to assassinate former minister

Updated 19 November 2024
Follow

Canada foiled Iran plot to assassinate former minister

  • The Globe and Mail newspaper reported that he was informed on October 26 that he faced an imminent threat
  • The 84-year-old was justice minister and attorney general from 2003 to 2006

Ottawa: Canadian authorities recently foiled an alleged Iranian plot to assassinate Irwin Cotler, a former justice minister who has been a strong critic of Tehran, Cotler’s organization said Monday.
The 84-year-old was justice minister and attorney general from 2003 to 2006. He retired from politics in 2015 but has remained active with many associations that campaign for human rights around the world.
The Globe and Mail newspaper reported that he was informed on October 26 that he faced an imminent threat — within 48 hours — of assassination from Iranian agents.
Authorities tracked two suspects in the plot, the paper said, citing an unnamed source.
In an email to AFP, the Raoul Wallenberg Center for Human Rights, where Cotler is international chair, confirmed the Globe and Mail report.
Cotler “has no knowledge or details regarding any arrests made,” said Brandon Golfman, an organization spokesman.
Tehran late on Monday denied what it described as “the claim of Canadian media that Iran tried to assassinate a Canadian person,” the official IRNA news agency reported, citing Issa Kameli, the director general for the Americas at the foreign ministry.
The Iranian diplomat denounced the report as “ridiculous storytelling and in line with the misinformation campaign against Iran.”
A spokesperson for Canadian Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc declined to comment, telling AFP: “We cannot comment on, nor confirm specific RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police) operations due to security reasons.”
Another senior government minister, Francois-Philippe Champagne, called the plot “very concerning.”
Jean-Yves Duclos, the government’s senior minister in Quebec province, where Cotler lives, said it was likely “very difficult for (Cotler), in particular, and his family and friends to hear” about it.
The House of Commons, meanwhile, passed a unanimous motion praising Cotler’s work in defense of human rights and “condemning the death threats against him orchestrated by agents of a foreign regime.”
Cotler had already been receiving police protection for more than a year after the October 7, 2023 attack in Israel by Hamas gunmen.
Cotler, who is Jewish and a strong backer of Israel, has advocated globally to have Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps listed as a terrorist entity.
His name reportedly also came up in an FBI probe of a 2022 Iranian murder-for-hire operation in New York that targeted American human rights activist Masih Alinejad.
Ottawa, which severed diplomatic ties with Iran more than a decade ago, listed the Revolutionary Guard as a banned terror group in June.
It said at the time that Iranian authorities displayed a consistent “disregard for human rights both inside and outside of Iran, as well as a willingness to destabilize the international rules-based order.”
As a lawyer, Cotler also represented Iranian political prisoners and dissidents.
His daughter, Michal Cotler-Wunsh, is an Israeli politician and diplomat who previously served as a member of Israel’s parliament.