Unity Day: A key moment in Germany’s post-Cold War history

The Brandenburg Gate in Berlin, above, the symbol of a reunified nation. (Shutterstock)
Updated 03 October 2019
Follow

Unity Day: A key moment in Germany’s post-Cold War history

  • National Day of Germany this year coincides with the 30th anniversary of the fall of Berlin Wall
  • Angela Merkel has long been the most important political leader in continental Europe

LONDON : The National Day of Germany this year coincides with the upcoming 30th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall.

The Oct. 3 event also comes at another key moment in the nation’s post-Cold War history, with Angela Merkel’s long chancellorship now in its twilight phase after around a decade and a half in office.

Merkel has long been the most important political leader in continental Europe, having been head of the German Christian Democratic Union (CDU) from 2000 to 2018, and chancellor since 2005.

Indeed, in the era of Donald Trump, she has had solid claims to being the most influential leader in the Western world too, with the potential exception of Emmanuel Macron.

To put Merkel’s achievements into wider international perspective, three US presidents (George Bush, Barack Obama and Trump), four French presidents (Jacques Chirac, Nicolas Sarkozy, Francois Hollande and Macron), and five UK prime ministers (Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson) have so far served during her long tenure.

Merkel has already exceeded the previous record of Margaret Thatcher as Europe’s longest serving female leader, which was 11 years.

It remains unclear if she will serve a full fourth term to 2021, by which time she would match Helmut Kohl’s 16 years of office from 1982 to 1998 and surpass Konrad Adenauer’s service from 1949 to 1963 as Germany’s first post-war chancellor.

Indeed, a full fourth term would place Merkel only behind Otto von Bismarck, who served for almost two decades from 1871–90 during a period in which he was a dominant force in European affairs, having helped previously drive the unification of Germany.

Yet, while Merkel is such a pivotal figure on the global stage, with Germany the anchor country in the EU, she is facing challenges on multiple fronts.

This includes defending the integrity of the EU and preserving the broader Western post-war order that she and many compatriots in Germany so value.

Merkel has played a major role in the last decade in efforts to stabilize the Brussels-based club of the EU — from the Greek debt crisis through to the immigration challenges, in which her country took in a million refugees and migrants in 2015 alone.

Another challenge to the EU’s stability are the continuing Brexit negotiations, which will come to a head again this Autumn with the possibility that the United Kingdom could leave with “no-deal.”




The 30th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall coincides with the German National Day on Oct. 3. (Shutterstock)

Beyond Brexit, the fragility of broader political situation across the continent is shown not only by the weakening of Merkel’s own government, but also by the populist surge in eastern Europe.

Donald Tusk, president of the EU Council, has remarked that the challenges are collectively perhaps the “most dangerous ever.”

According to Tusk, two of the main threats are the rise of anti-EU, nationalist sentiment across the continent, and the “state of mind of pro-European elites,” which Tusk fears are too subservient to “populist arguments, as well as doubting in the fundamental values of liberal democracy.”

While Brexit exemplifies these challenges, the problem is by no means limited to the UK, as countries from Italy to Poland show.

If these issues were not big enough for Merkel, the third threat cited by Tusk is what he calls the new geopolitical reality that has witnessed an increasing assertive Russia and instability in the Middle East and Africa. The latter has driven the migration problems that are afflicting Europe.

Intensifying this is the uncertainty from Washington, with Trump previously calling for more Brexits across the continent.

Merkel’s own style and values have frequently collided with those of Trump, who relishes his role as disruptor of the established Western order that she embodies.

While the White House has asserted that Germany is “a bedrock of the transatlantic relationship and the NATO alliance,” bilateral relations have unquestionably been cooler in recent years.

This was symbolised in March 2017 when Merkel first met Trump. He appeared to refuse shaking her hand at a press conference, and the two did not even speak from last autumn for more than five months before a phone call on March 1.

The personal animosity between Trump and Merkel has brought a chill to bilateral relations with several issues becoming thornier in the bilateral relationship, including trade and defence spending.

On trade, Trump has called Germany “very bad” because of its significant trade surplus — with exports larger than imports; the president has particularly singled out the nation’s car exports, which he has threatened to put tariffs on.

Merkel is acutely aware of this irritant in bilateral relations and has asserted that Germany’s trade surplus is on a pathway to narrowing due to higher domestic demand.

A second sore centres around Germany’s failure to spend 2 percent of GDP on defense spending, a key NATO goal. Indeed, the country spent “only” 1.13 percent of GDP in 2017.

Again, Merkel acknowledges the vulnerability here. She asserts that the nation is committed to the 2% target, with foreign missions from Mali to Afghanistan and humanitarian aid in Syria.

Yet, the tensions between Germany and the US are a microcosm of broader tensions within the Western alliance which Merkel cares so deeply about.

Since she became head of the CDU, there have been a series of intra-Western disagreements over issues from the Middle East, including the Iraq war (opposed in 2003 by Germany) through to the rise of China, with some European countries and the US having disagreements over the best way to engage with the rising Asian power.

Yet, despite occasional discord, until the Trump presidency Germany and key Western nations generally continued to agree around a broad range of issues such as international trade; backing for a Middle Eastern peace process between Israel and the Palestinians along the Oslo principles; plus strong support for the international rules-based system and the supranational organizations that make this work.

Today, many of these key principles are being disrupted if not outright undermined by Trump’s agenda.

The ongoing battle that Merkel is fighting with Trump matters not just to Germany, therefore, but also to Europe and the world at large, given that she — alongside Macron — has emerged as perhaps the most authoritative defender of the liberal international order in her period in office.

Indeed, she and French president, with Trump, currently embody more than any other democratic leaders the present “fight” in international relations between the liberal centre ground, and an apparently rising populist tide, and which will play out into the 2020s.


UPDATE 2-Pope Leo XIV appeals for ‘no more war’ in first Sunday message

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

UPDATE 2-Pope Leo XIV appeals for ‘no more war’ in first Sunday message

  • Pope Leo calls for ‘authentic’ peace in Ukraine
  • Pontiff appeals for Gaza ceasefire, release of Israeli hostages
VATICAN CITY:
Pope Leo XIV appealed to the world’s major powers for “no more war” in his first Sunday message to crowds in St. Peter’s Square since his election as pontiff.
The new pope, elected on May 8, called for an “authentic and lasting peace” in Ukraine, a ceasefire in Gaza, and the release of all Israeli hostages held by militant group Hamas.
Leo also welcomed the recent fragile ceasefire between India and Pakistan, negotiated overnight, and said he was praying to God to grant the world the “miracle of peace.”
“No more war!” the pope said, repeating a frequent call of the late Pope Francis and noting the recent 80th anniversary of the end of World War Two, in which some 60 million people were killed.
Leo said today’s world was living through “the dramatic scenario of a Third World War being fought piecemeal,” again repeating a phrase coined by Francis.
The new pope said he carries in his heart the “suffering of the beloved people of Ukraine.”
Hours after Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed direct talks with Ukraine aimed at ending the bloody three-year war, Leo appealed for negotiations to reach an “authentic, just and lasting peace.”
The pope also said he was “profoundly saddened” by the war in Gaza, calling for an immediate ceasefire, humanitarian aid and release of the remaining hostages held by Hamas.
Leo said he was glad to hear of the recent India-Pakistan ceasefire and hoped negotiations would lead to a lasting accord between the nuclear-armed neighbors.
He added: “But there are so many other conflicts in the world!“
US-BORN POPE SPEAKS ITALIAN TO CROWD
Leo, the former Cardinal Robert Prevost, is the first US-born pontiff and was a relative unknown on the world stage before his election.
He previously served for decades as a missionary in Peru before first becoming a cardinal to take up a senior Vatican role two years ago.
Leo’s first Sunday address to tens of thousands in the square coincided with a previously planned pilgrimage to Rome by marching bands from around the world.
Minutes before the pope addressed the crowd, bands marched up the broad boulevard leading to the Vatican playing songs such as Y.M.C.A. by the Village People, the theme from the film Rocky, and music by John Philip Sousa, who composed the marching classic “Stars and Stripes Forever.”
The crowd, estimated at more than 100,000 by Italian authorities, was also entertained by bands from Italy, Mexico and other parts of Latin America who came to Rome for the ongoing Catholic Holy Year.
Leo gave his address on Sunday in fluent Italian.
In all of his appearances since his election, Leo has not made any mention of the country of his birth, angering some US conservative commentators.

India and Pakistan ceasefire shaken by overnight border fighting in disputed Kashmir region

Updated 11 May 2025
Follow

India and Pakistan ceasefire shaken by overnight border fighting in disputed Kashmir region

  • Residents and officials in the disputed Kashmir region say there was overnight border fighting between Pakistani and Indian troops
  • As part of the ceasefire, agreed a day earlier, the nuclear-armed neighbors agreed to immediately stop all firing and military action on land, in the air and at sea
  • They accused each other of repeatedly violating the deal hours later

ISLAMABAD: A ceasefire to end the conflict between India and Pakistan was shaken by overnight border fighting in the disputed Kashmir region.
People on both sides of the Line of Control, which divides the territory, reported heavy exchanges of fire between Indian and Pakistani troops. The fighting subsided by Sunday morning.
The two countries agreed to a truce a day earlier after talks to defuse the most serious military confrontation between them in decades following a gun massacre of tourists that India blames on Pakistan, which denies the charge.
As part of the ceasefire, the nuclear-armed neighbors agreed to immediately stop all firing and military action on land, in the air and at sea. They accused each other of repeatedly violating the deal just hours later.
Drones were spotted Saturday night over Indian-controlled Kashmir and the western state of Gujarat according to Indian officials.
In the Poonch area of Indian-controlled Kashmir, people said the intense shelling from the past few days had traumatized them.
“Most people ran as shells were being fired,” said college student Sosan Zehra who returned home Sunday. “It was completely chaotic.”
In Pakistan-controlled Kashmir’s Neelum Valley, which is three kilometers from the Line of Control, people said there were exchanges of fire and heavy shelling after the ceasefire began.
Resident Mohammad Zahid said: “We were happy about the announcement but, once again, the situation feels uncertain.”
US President Donald Trump was the first to post about the deal, announcing it on his Truth Social platform. Indian and Pakistani officials confirmed the news shortly after.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi chaired a high-level meeting on Sunday with top government and military officials.
India, unlike Pakistan, has not said anything about Trump or the US since the deal was announced. Nor has India acknowledged anyone beyond its military contact with the Pakistanis.
Both armies have engaged in daily fighting since Wednesday along the rugged and mountainous Line of Control, which is marked by razor wire coils, watchtowers and bunkers that snake across foothills populated by villages, tangled bushes and forests.
They have routinely blamed the other for starting the skirmishes while insisting they were only retaliating.
India and Pakistan’s two top military officials are due to speak again on Monday.


Putin’s proposed Ukraine talks ‘not enough’: Macron

Updated 11 May 2025
Follow

Putin’s proposed Ukraine talks ‘not enough’: Macron

PRZEMYSL: President Vladimir Putin’s proposal for direct negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, after Kyiv and its European allies called for a 30-day ceasefire, is “not enough,” French President Emmanuel Macron said on Sunday.
“An unconditional ceasefire is not preceded by negotiations, by definition,” Macron told reporters as he stepped off a train in the Polish city of Przemysl on his return from a trip to Ukraine, adding that Putin was “looking for a way out, but he still wants to buy time.”
Western allies have repeatedly accused Putin of delaying tactics with regards to any potential bid to end the conflict in Ukraine, which has dragged on since February 2022.
Asked if this was another such example, Macron replied: “Yes, it is.”
Macron visited Kyiv on Saturday with the leaders of Germany, Britain and Poland, with the four of them and President Volodymyr Zelensky calling for a 30-day unconditional ceasefire starting on Monday.
Macron warned that Russia would face “massive sanctions” if it did not comply.
The United States and other countries back the proposal, the leaders said.
Speaking at the Kremlin in the early hours of Sunday, Putin proposed direct negotiations with Ukraine in Istanbul in the coming days but did not address the 30-day ceasefire proposal.
“It’s a way of not answering... of showing that he is committed while also trying to maintain ambiguity in the eyes of the Americans,” Macron said.
“We need to stand firm with the Americans and say that the ceasefire is unconditional and then we can discuss the rest,” he added.
Macron also said that Putin’s proposal was “unacceptable for the Ukrainians because they cannot accept parallel discussions while they continue to be bombed.”
He also cast doubt on whether Zelensky would agree to talks in Istanbul given the “complicated” Russian-Ukrainian negotiations held there shortly after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022.


Trump says will increase trade 'substantially' with India, Pakistan

Updated 11 May 2025
Follow

Trump says will increase trade 'substantially' with India, Pakistan

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said late Saturday he would increase trade "substantially" with India and Pakistan.
"I am going to increase trade, substantially, with both of these great Nations," he posted on TruthSocial after the arch-rivals agreed to a ceasefire after days of deadly fighting.
However, since the ceasefire was announced, both sides have traded accusations of truce violations.


Under Trump pressure, Columbia University ends semester in turmoil

Updated 11 May 2025
Follow

Under Trump pressure, Columbia University ends semester in turmoil

  • Biliana said she made sure to stay far away from these kinds of demonstrations, fearful she might show up in a photo and be falsely linked to the group

NEW YORK: Biliana, an international student at New York’s Columbia University, is studying for exams but fears being arrested by immigration police.
Columbia professors meanwhile are scrambling to save research funding in the crosshairs of President Donald Trump’s administration.
An atmosphere of crisis hovers over campus as the semester winds down, as the White House accuses the prestigious university and other Ivy League schools of anti-Semitism and “woke” liberal ideology.
Several hundred foreign students nationwide have been threatened with the cancelation of their visas, while others have been targeted — and a few arrested, including at Columbia — over everything from participation in pro-Palestinian protests to traffic violations.
“The situation is just terrifying,” said Biliana, a 29-year-old law student, who feels such dread that she asked not to be identified by her real name or even the Latin American country she comes from.
“You feel like you cannot say anything, you cannot share anything.”
She went on: “Me and my friends, we have not been posting anything on Twitter,” and many are deleting old posts for fear of crossing an invisible red line.
“Basically, what we’re trying to do is just to go to normal classes,” she said.
Last week, with final exams looming, 80 pro-Palestinian protesters were arrested after attempting to overtake the main library.
The university’s interim president quickly condemned the protest action.
Biliana said she made sure to stay far away from these kinds of demonstrations, fearful she might show up in a photo and be falsely linked to the group.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said officials were reviewing the visa status of the “vandals” involved, adding: “Pro-Hamas thugs are no longer welcome in our great nation.”
For newly elected student body president Oscar Wolfe, “There is definitely a heightened level of anxiety among international students, regardless of their involvement in the protests.”
Wolfe arrived on campus in September 2023, just before Hamas militants launched their October 7 attack on Israel, sparking the Gaza war and giving rise to protests that continue. He said he has known little more than a month of “normal” campus life.
Reflecting the turmoil, Columbia — which normally draws thousands of tourists to its Manhattan campus featuring colonnaded buildings, sweeping lawns and famous Alma Mater statue — has largely cut off public access to its grounds.
The Trump administration has accused the university of allowing anti-Semitism to flourish on campus — something the school strongly denies — and has slashed some $400 million of Columbia’s federal funding.
Harvard, another Ivy League college, has defiantly pushed back — suing the administration to halt a federal freeze of $2 billion in grants.
Columbia, for its part, is negotiating with the government. But on Wednesday, interim President Claire Shipman announced that “nearly 180 of our colleagues who have been working, in whole or in part, on impacted federal grants” were going to lose their jobs.
Rebecca Muhle, a professor of psychiatry, said her grant for a research project on autism was “not canceled, but it’s not funded — it’s in limbo.”
“I cannot hire anyone or make large purchases,” she said.
“There are many, many grants in this situation,” Muhle added. “It’s chaos, and you can’t conduct good science in chaos.”
History professor Matthew Connelly, who specializes in state secrets and their declassification, said he had been notified that the National Endowment for the Humanities had canceled two grants, with “no real reason given.”
The grants, he said, were intended to train scholars and archivists in analyzing and preserving historical records, particularly those in digital form — “one of the great challenges facing researchers.”
But Connelly said he was not about to throw in the towel.
“Universities are a target, because everything we do is completely contrary to what the Trump administration is trying to achieve,” he said.
“If we stopped teaching... if we stopped doing our research, we would be handing them a victory.”
Student leader Wolfe also views this as part of a broader battle.
“This is not just an attack on Columbia,” he said, “it is the opening act of an attack against civil society.”