Pakistan Resolution Day: The Lahore Resolution and the creation of Pakistan

Pakistani worshippers offer evening prayers at the historical Badshahi mosque in Lahore on April 25, 2015. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 23 March 2020
Follow

Pakistan Resolution Day: The Lahore Resolution and the creation of Pakistan

  • During the years between the adoption of the Lahore Resolution and Independence, the Muslim population comprised just one quarter of the total Indian population

The Lahore Resolution of 1940 is the result of the what may be considered one of the most significant political movements in recent world history. It led to the creation of a separate homeland for the Muslims of the Indian subcontinent. This homeland was destined to survive and thrive despite being plagued with innumerable conspiracies and intrigues hatched in rapid succession by ill-wishing forces.
That Pakistan came into existence seven years after the resolution of March 23, 1940 is a wonder in itself. It was created in the wake of sharp ideological divides that were exacerbated by the prejudiced conduct of the Hindu leadership, whose sole aim was to subdue the Muslim population after India’s independence from British colonial rule.
Inspired by the sagacity and farsightedness of philosopher Allama Muhammad Iqbal and founder of the nation Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Muslims of the subcontinent soon realized that they risked becoming a permanent minority if India remained undivided after Independence. This realization was not based on apprehension alone but on solid calculations. In the emerging, post-independence scenario, it was likely to become nearly impossible for Muslims to protect their fundamental rights under the umbrella of the Hindu majority, whose leaders and elite had already started exhibiting hegemonic attitudes.
During the years between the adoption of the Lahore Resolution and Independence, the Muslim population comprised just one quarter of the total Indian population. Given this situation, Muslims first demanded separate electorates with the aim of protecting their political, social and religious rights.
Due to the political developments that took place thereafter, however, they determined that even the right to separate electorates would not be enough. They had to search for some other long-term solution.
In his famous Allahabad address, Iqbal made it clear that Islam had its own socio-economic system and, in order to implement it, a separate, independent political entity was required.

Guided by Iqbal’s vision, Jinnah began working in full swing to gather Muslim support.
The overwhelming support from the Muslim masses for his call to celebrate the Day of Deliverance on December 22, 1939 was actually a symbolic vote of confidence in Jinnah’s leadership. This mass mobilization soon transformed into the Pakistan Movement. Jinnah’s speeches raised morale, which gave Muslims the confidence to shape their own destiny. It was, in fact, the most significant manifestation of the people’s will and support that ultimately triumphed over all the intrigues spearheaded by the Hindu leadership, who did their utmost, in league with some British colonial functionaries, to resist the creation of an independent Muslim homeland.
Jinnah’s address to the Lahore Conference, which finally adopted the March 23 Resolution, motivated multitudes of Muslims to launch a sustainable, unwavering movement for freedom.
According to historical estimates, thousands of people took part in the conference at Minto Park, near the Badshahi Mosque and Lahore Fort. Historian Stanley Wolpert described Jinnah’s address as the moment in which he irrevocably transformed himself into the leader of the fight for a separate Muslim homeland.
Jinnah, in his two-hour address in English, narrated the events that had taken place in the past few months and concluded: “Hindus and the Muslims belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs and literature. They neither inter-marry nor inter-dine together, and, indeed, they belong to two different civilizations that are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions. Their concepts on life and afterlife are different. It is quite clear that Hindus and Muslims derive their inspiration from different sources of history. They have different epics, different heroes and different episodes. Very often the hero of one is a foe of the other, and likewise, their victories and defeats overlap. To yoke together two such nations under a single state, one as a numerical minority and the other as a majority, must lead to growing discontent and final destruction of any fabric that may be so built up for the government of such a state.”
He further stated: “Muslims are a nation according to any definition of nationhood. We wish our people to develop to the fullest, spiritual, cultural, economic, social and political life in a way that we think best and in consonance with our own ideals and according to the genius of our people.”
During his speech, Jinnah also quoted the letter written by Lala Lajpat Rai in 1924 to C.R. Das, in which he clearly mentioned that Hindus and Muslims were two separate and distinct nations that could never be merged into a single one. When, on one occasion, Muslim notable Malik Barkat Ali claimed that Lala Lajpat Rai was a nationalist Hindu leader, Jinnah responded, “No Hindu can be a nationalist. Every Hindu is a Hindu first and last.”


Harvard loses another $450 million in grants in escalating battle with Trump administration

Updated 5 min 10 sec ago
Follow

Harvard loses another $450 million in grants in escalating battle with Trump administration

  • A federal antisemitism task force said Harvard will lose grants from eight federal agencies
  • Harvard has faced escalating sanctions from the White House after becoming the first US university to openly defy the government’s demands to limit pro-Palestinian activism

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump’s administration is cutting another $450 million in grants to Harvard University a day after the Ivy League school pushed back against government allegations that it’s a hotbed of liberalism and antisemitism.

In a letter to Harvard on Tuesday, a federal antisemitism task force said Harvard will lose grants from eight federal agencies in addition to $2.2 billion that was previously frozen by the Trump administration.

The letter said Harvard has become a “breeding ground for virtue signaling and discrimination” and faces a “steep, uphill battle” to reclaim its legacy as a place of academic excellence.

“There is a dark problem on Harvard’s campus, and by prioritizing appeasement over accountability, institutional leaders have forfeited the school’s claim to taxpayer support,” the letter said.

It was signed by officials at the Education Department, Health and Human Services and the General Services Administration.

University officials did not immediately provide comment on the letter.

Harvard has faced escalating sanctions from the White House after becoming the first US university to openly defy the government’s demands to limit pro-Palestinian activism and end diversity, equity and inclusion practices.

Trump, a Republican, has said he wants Harvard to lose its tax-exempt status, and the Department of Homeland Security has threatened to revoke the school’s eligibility to host foreign students.

Last week, the Education Department said Harvard will receive no new federal grants until it meets the government’s demands.

The Trump administration has demanded Harvard make broad leadership changes, revise its admissions policies and audit its faculty and student body to ensure the campus is home to many viewpoints.

The demands are part of a pressure campaign targeting several other high-profile universities. The administration has cut off money to colleges including Columbia University, the University of Pennsylvania and Cornell University, seeking compliance with Trump’s agenda.

Harvard is suing to block the federal funding freeze.

Harvard President Alan Garber disputed the government’s allegations in a Monday letter, saying Harvard is nonpartisan and has taken steps to root out antisemitism on campus. He insisted that Harvard is in compliance with the law, calling the federal sanctions an “unlawful attempt to control fundamental aspects of our university’s operations.”

The government’s letter on Tuesday said Harvard has repeatedly failed to address racial discrimination and antisemitism on campus. It cited the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision striking down Harvard’s use of race in the admissions process, along with a recent internal report at Harvard detailing cases of antisemitic harassment.

___ Collin Binkley has covered Harvard for nearly a decade — most of the time living half a mile from its campus.


Trump to meet with Syria’s Al-Sharaa as he weighs easing sanctions after Assad’s overthrow

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Trump to meet with Syria’s Al-Sharaa as he weighs easing sanctions after Assad’s overthrow

  • Trump said he’s weighing removing US sanctions on the Syrian government

RIYADH: President Donald Trump will meet Wednesday in Saudi Arabia with Syrian President Ahmad Al-Sharaa, the onetime insurgent who last year led the overthrow of former leader Bashar Assad.
“The President agreed to say hello to the Syrian President while in Saudi Arabia tomorrow,” the White House said.
The US has been weighing how to handle Al-Sharaa since he took power in December. Gulf leaders, have rallied behind the new government in Damascus and will want Trump to follow, believing it is a bulwark against Iran’s return to influence in Syria, where it had helped prop up Assad’s government during a decade-long civil war.
Then-President Joe Biden left the decision to Trump, whose administration has yet to formally recognize the new Syrian government. Sanctions imposed on Damascus under Assad also remain in place.
As he prepared to leave Washington, Trump said he’s weighing removing sanctions on the Syrian government.
“We may want to take them off of Syria, because we want to give them a fresh start,” said Trump, adding that Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has urged him to do so.
The comments marked a striking change in tone from Trump, who has been deeply skeptical of Syrian President Ahmed Al-Sharaa.
Formerly known by the nom de guerre Abu Mohammed Al-Golani, Al-Sharaa joined the ranks of Al-Qaeda insurgents battling US forces in Iraq after the US-led invasion in 2003 and still faces a warrant for his arrest on terrorism charges in Iraq.
Al-Sharaa, whom the US once offered $10 million for information about his whereabouts because of his links to Al-Qaeda, came back to his home country after the conflict began in 2011 where he led Al-Qaeda’s branch that used to be known as the Nusra Front. He later changed the name of his group to Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham (HTS) and cut links with Al-Qaeda.


Bulgarian parliament rejects president’s euro referendum proposal

Updated 41 min 30 sec ago
Follow

Bulgarian parliament rejects president’s euro referendum proposal

  • Kiselova said it did not comply with several articles of the Bulgarian constitution
  • The constitutional court has previously rejected a petition for a referendum on joining the euro
Kiselova said it did not comply with several articles of the Bulgarian constitution
The constitutional court has previously rejected a petition for a referendum on joining the euro

SOFIA: The speaker of the Bulgarian national assembly Nataliya Kiselova has dismissed President Rumen Radev’s proposal for a national referendum on adopting the euro, saying it violated the constitution, the BTA news agency reported on Tuesday.

On Monday, Radev had suggested a referendum on Bulgaria’s plans to adopt the euro next year with the question: “Do you agree that Bulgaria should introduce the single European currency ‘euro’ in 2026?” His proposal was criticized by the government, with one minister saying it was an attempt to sabotage its efforts to join the single currency.

Sending back the proposal, Kiselova said it did not comply with several articles of the Bulgarian constitution and related European Union treaties, and was inconsistent with rulings from the country’s constitutional court.

The constitutional court has previously rejected a petition for a referendum on joining the euro.

The government aims to adopt the euro next January, pending confirmation from the European Commission and the European Central Bank in June that all membership criteria have been met.

Economists say that Bulgaria, whose lev currency has long been pegged to the euro, would attract more foreign investment if it adopted the single currency and would secure credit ratings upgrades that could cut its debt financing costs.

However, Bulgarians are split on the euro’s adoption, with concerns that it might lead to price hikes, similar to what occurred in Croatia when it switched to the euro in 2023.

Germany’s Merz: EU to tighten sanctions on Russia if no progress on Ukraine this week

Updated 13 May 2025
Follow

Germany’s Merz: EU to tighten sanctions on Russia if no progress on Ukraine this week

  • Merz said EU leaders had agreed with Zelensky that he could take part in talks with Russia
  • “I believe more compromise and more concessions are no longer reasonable“

BERLIN: The European Union is ready to impose tougher sanctions on Russia if progress on ending the war in Ukraine is not made this week, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Tuesday, adding a new package of sanctions was prepared.

“We are waiting for (Russian President Vladimir) Putin’s agreement and we agree that if there is no real progress this week, we want to work together at European level for a significant tightening of sanctions,” Merz said at a news conference with his Greek counterpart.

“We will be looking at other areas, such as the energy sector and also the financial market,” he said.

Merz said EU leaders had agreed with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that he could take part in talks with Russia in Istanbul this week on the condition that Russian bombardment and attacks on civilians in Ukraine must stop.

While saying he admired Zelensky’s willingness to compromise if it could help a ceasefire, Merz added:

“I believe more compromise and more concessions are no longer reasonable,” said Merz.

Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis said the EU must be at the center of any peace settlement.


Putin ‘doesn’t dare’ meet Zelensky in Istanbul: EU’s Kallas

Updated 13 May 2025
Follow

Putin ‘doesn’t dare’ meet Zelensky in Istanbul: EU’s Kallas

  • The meeting set for Thursday in Istanbul would be the first direct negotiations
  • Zelensky has urged Putin to personally attend the talks

COPENHAGEN: The European Union’s top diplomat Kaja Kallas said Tuesday she didn’t think Russian President Vladimir Putin would turn up for talks in Turkiye this week with Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky.

The meeting set for Thursday in Istanbul would be the first direct negotiations between Ukrainian and Russian officials since the early months of Moscow’s invasion in 2022.

Zelensky has urged Putin to personally attend the talks that the Kremlin leader himself suggested, but Moscow has so far declined to respond to the invitation.

“I think it’s a good move if they sit down,” Kallas told a democracy conference in Copenhagen, adding: “But I don’t think he dares, Putin.”

“It has been over two months since Ukraine agreed to an unconditional ceasefire,” she said.

“Russia is clearly playing games, trying to find time, hoping that time is on their side. We haven’t seen any good efforts or good signs from their side.”

Ukraine said Tuesday that a Putin no-show would be a clear sign that Moscow is not serious about peace.

“If Vladimir Putin refuses to come to Turkiye, it will be the final signal that Russia does not want to end this war, that Russia is not willing and not ready for any negotiations,” Zelensky’s chief of staff, Andriy Yermak, said in a statement.