‘Winning people over in today’s age of ‘woke’ advertising means you have to bring more than a great product or service to the table’: Grey Group COO

Nirvik Singh
Short Url
Updated 21 July 2020
Follow

‘Winning people over in today’s age of ‘woke’ advertising means you have to bring more than a great product or service to the table’: Grey Group COO

  • Q&A with Nirvik Singh, global chief operating officer of Grey Group
  • Online retail, entertainment, and gaming sees massive global growth since start of COVID-19 pandemic

DUBAI: Grey veteran Nirvik Singh took the reins of the advertising group in September 2019 when he was appointed as its global chief operating officer – just three months before the first COVID-19 cases were announced.

Prior to that, he served as chairman and CEO of Grey Group Asia Pacific, Middle East, and Africa since 2016, a role he continues to fulfill.

Arab News caught up with Singh to discuss how the advertising business has been impacted this year and what the future holds for advertisers and marketers.

How has COVID-19 affected the advertising business?

COVID-19 has forced a rethink across all industries, and marketing and advertising is no exception.

Consumer behavior and purchasing patterns have changed considerably and some of them, probably permanently.

As lockdown measures were placed across the globe, most media channels, except digital, shrank almost instantly. The postponement of big sporting events, such as the Olympics, also had a significant effect.

Being agile has never been as important; brands have had to adapt quickly by following the consumer, which has meant prioritizing digital communications.

The online environment – including retail, entertainment, and gaming – has seen massive growth in consumption, and shoppable posts are becoming the dominant means of sales conversions for 2020 and beyond.

Brands will rely more on the concept of ‘walled gardens’ i.e. the digital platforms that combine paid advertising with e-commerce to drive sales.




With the need for people to stay home and stay safe, Panadol launched a CSR campaign to fight COVID-19 by asking people to embrace the new normal

What has the impact been on clients?

Industry sectors have been affected differently; marketing activity has held up relatively well in the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG), tech and healthcare sectors, and it is within those sectors that the most significant changes in communication have taken place.

As people rely on the online world more than ever, marketers have leant heavily on digital solutions, accelerating the shift toward social media and online services.

E-commerce is booming, content creation that is more interactive and conducive to the customer experience is flourishing, gaming has reached previously unimaginable levels of consumer engagement, and the remote working ecosystem has gone from strength to strength.

Such rapid changes in consumer behavior and advertising spend throws up innumerable challenges, but also opportunities. It is how agencies respond to these challenges, and how well they adapt and embrace the opportunities, that will define their success for the future.

What are the clients’ top challenges at the moment?

Staying afloat and remaining relevant. Both are intrinsically connected. How does a brand remain an integral part of consumers’ lives in these unreal times? All clients will have to answer this question decisively. I would say it lies in brand purpose.

This is not just hearsay; it is backed by industry research. Harvard Business Review and Ernst and Young, for example, found that brands that operated with a clear sense of purpose outperformed the S&P 500 by a factor of 10 between 1996 and 2011.

Accenture Strategy’s recent global survey of nearly 30,000 consumers in 35 countries also found that 62 percent of respondents wanted companies to take a stand on issues such as sustainability, transparency, and fair employment practices. This is truer now than it has ever been as companies prioritize employee wellbeing and turn their attention toward the realization of a fairer, kinder, more sustainable world in the light of COVID-19.

 

During this time, how do you create ads that truly resonate with consumers and don’t come across as tone-deaf or pandering?

By showing awareness and empathy and, above all, being sincere.

Winning people over in today’s age of ‘woke’ advertising means you have to bring more than a great product or service to the table. Brands now need to have authentic stories with a social impact to make a connection and enjoy loyalty from their customers.

COVID-19 has only accelerated a trend that was already forming. Before the pandemic, environmental issues were at the forefront and climate activism was the movement that finally started to gain momentum, brands that are associated with a higher purpose, such as sustainability goals, are the ones that millennials have been gravitating toward.

Consumers want to know their brands of choice are there for them in difficult times and that they share similar values. Trust and authenticity are the keywords.

It is also possible to argue that it is our duty as marketers to provide both reassurance and solutions. That means brands being useful to the communities they serve and offering solutions that are supported by a real desire to help, and not just by looking after one’s bottom line.

Brands need to engage with their consumers in a relevant and purposeful manner such as when a car or house appliances manufacturer pivots its plant to make respirators, or a fashion house produces thousands of gallons of hand sanitizer. This shows their sincerity, where they talk the talk and walk the walk, supporting what they say not just with words but with actions that resonate with their customers. And we have seen brands step up.

 




As the world goes through a challenging phase, HSBC ensures its banking services are always within the consumer’s reach through its ‘Stronger Together’ campaign.

What initiatives have you taken to help employees and clients during this pandemic?

Our first priority was to secure the health and wellbeing of our staff – not just physical health but mental health too. It takes an adjustment to work from home and we needed to be cognizant of that.

We also had a duty to care for our clients by providing as much assistance and support as possible. That meant sharing knowledge and expertise via remote consultancy workshops, producing intelligence reports to keep them up to date with current insights, social media campaigns to raise awareness of the importance of play hygiene for young kids, and helping our clients produce work such as digital illustrations for social media to show appreciation of frontline workers or shooting a video for a client’s COVID-19-related campaign.

One of our employees also began making face shields for frontline workers and soon had the whole office involved. It is initiatives like this that remind us that an idea can come from anywhere, not just from creative departments and the importance of everyone pitching in to do what they can.

What tools did you launch during this time?

At Grey, we were already working toward collaborating remotely, irrespective of where our people were located.

A few weeks before COVID-19 hit, we launched a unique internal platform called go.grey. It has changed the way we communicate, share, collaborate, and work with each other.

Now, across our network, we have access to every person, deck, campaign, intellectual property, and published work from around the globe at our fingertips. It has made us agile and efficient and helped us to adapt to working in a borderless way. It is now very much a part of our culture and has proved to be a useful platform during these challenging times of working remotely.

We also spearheaded two projects which were developed and made accessible to everyone. The first is an interactive game that encourages young children to follow a hygiene routine and stay safe as they return to public places. Developed by the Grey Amea team and called “Keep Off,” it injected fun into what was an urgent conversation for parents and yet a tedious task for children.

The second was a real-time COVID-19 tracker developed by our digital and social arm, Autumn Grey. Providing data coverage across India, the tracker is available in all the local languages and dialects and provides updates and advice from government bodies, the World Health Organization, and medical experts. Engaging and innovative, both projects gave back to the community and allowed us to stay true to our “Famously Effective” banner.

What are some of the client efforts related to the pandemic that you have worked on?

There have been plenty, as you would imagine, during an unprecedented time of global upheaval, but I’ll focus on just a few.

Grey produced a campaign for HSBC called “Stronger Together,” which reassured customers that its banking services were always within reach, services especially needed in these challenging times.

In Saudi Arabia, Grey created a campaign for Panadol Cold and Flu to remind people that caring for one another does not change, no matter what the circumstances. We also crafted a campaign for Panadol Extra in Saudi Arabia and the UAE to put out the message to stay home and stay safe.

Lastly, the agency created a campaign for P&G’s Venus called “Self-Care Starts at Home,” which promotes the idea that one can look after oneself without always having to rely on others.




Grey MENA and Beirut’s campaign for P&G’s Venus shows how women can practice self-care at home as salons are shut during the lockdown


 What are your plans for the agency and to support clients now that the lockdown has been lifted in certain parts of the Middle East?

Most of our clients are already in a recovery mindset. The importance of rebound strategies and implementing marketing solutions to bring consumers closer to the
brand can help with a faster recovery. If there is anything we have learnt, it’s that authentic ‘brand purpose’, and effective ‘story-telling’ are both going to play a central role. This, supported with data analytics, intelligence reports, customer experience, e-commerce pivots, social and digital -will all be beneficial for our clients in determining the new patterns of demand and consumption and how best for them to bounce back in this new environment.
Finally, let’s also not forget the power of the big creative idea remains as potent as ever. We will continue to produce work that is ‘famously effective’ and sets us apart.
 
How do you foresee the rest of the year and 2021 for the advertising andmarketing industry?
 
I’m cautiously optimistic about the rebound.  Governments across the region are relaxing lockdowns, businesses are re-opening, and stimulus packages are boosting confidence as much as possible -while still considering safety. There is also a belief that recovery will happen at a faster pace than was first predicted. All brands now more than ever, will need to find shared values with consumers to gain their loyalty for the long term, and this is something we will see as an intrinsic part of the comeback plan for 2020-21 and beyond.
 
From an agency work perspective, there has been on-going activity, and things did not come to a complete halt. In fact, throughout this period, we have been pitching, interacting virtually with old clients, winning new clients, and have created campaigns that resonated well with the public. We were fortunate as our people adapted surprisingly well and quickly to remote working in these challenging times –  kudos to them all. No doubt there has been a slowdown and consumers are still quite cautious with spending. However, as lockdown eases, I think there will be a continuous and measured increase in demand, and consumption will start increasing as the population starts to gain more confidence and sees signs of economic stability.
I think this difficult time has given everyone pause to think of what matters and what is important, for people and the planet, and I am hopeful a better and kinder society will emerge from this crisis.
 


China court jails journalist for seven years on spy charges, family says

Updated 29 November 2024
Follow

China court jails journalist for seven years on spy charges, family says

  • Police in the Chinese capital detained veteran Chinese state media journalist Dong Yuyu in February 2022
  • ‘Sentencing Yuyu to seven years in prison on no evidence declares to the world the bankruptcy of the justice system in China’

BEIJING/HONG KONG: A Beijing court sentenced veteran Chinese state media journalist Dong Yuyu on Friday to seven years in prison for espionage, his family said in a statement, calling the verdict a grave injustice.
Police in the Chinese capital detained the 62-year-old former Guangming Daily editor and journalist in February 2022 while he was lunching with a Japanese diplomat, the US National Press Club said in a statement. He was later charged with espionage.
“Sentencing Yuyu to seven years in prison on no evidence declares to the world the bankruptcy of the justice system in China,” Dong’s family said in a statement provided to Reuters.
“Today’s verdict is a grave injustice not only to Yuyu and his family but also to every freethinking Chinese journalist and every ordinary Chinese committed to friendly engagement with the world.”
The family added that in the court judgment, Japanese diplomats whom Dong met were “specifically named as agents of an ‘espionage organization,’ which is the Japanese embassy in Beijing.”
Dong’s conviction implied every Chinese citizen would be “expected to know that the Chinese government may consider those embassies to be ‘espionage organizations’,” it said, causing a chilling effect.
Police guarded the court on Friday, with seven police cars parked nearby, and journalists were asked to leave the area. A US diplomat said they had been barred from attending the hearing.
Dong has been detained in a Beijing prison since a closed-court hearing in July 2023, the press club said in September.
“Chinese authorities must reverse this unjust verdict, and protect the right of journalists to work freely and safely in China,” said Beh Lih Yi, Asia program manager at the Committee to Protect Journalists.
“Dong Yuyu should be reunited with his family immediately.”
Dong regularly had in-person exchanges with diplomats from various embassies and journalists.
The Japanese diplomat he met, one of two he had regularly met in the past, was also detained for several hours, spurring a complaint from Japan’s foreign ministry.
At the time, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson said the diplomat was engaged in activities “inconsistent with their capacity” in China. The diplomat was later released.
A Nieman Fellow at Harvard University in 2007, Dong was a visiting scholar and visiting professor at Keio University and Hokkaido University in Japan, his family said in a statement in April 2023.
He joined the Guangming Daily, affiliated to the ruling Communist Party, in 1987, after graduating from Peking University law school, and was the deputy editor of its commentary section.
He wrote opinion articles in Chinese media and liberal academic journals on topics from legal reforms to social issues, and co-edited a book promoting the rule of law in China.
His articles advocated moderate reforms while avoiding direct criticism of President Xi Jinping.
His family had initially kept news of his detention private in the hope that charges could be reduced or dropped, but were told in March 2023 that he would stand trial, they said in their statement.
Non-government bodies (NGOs) advocating press freedom have called for his release, with more than 700 journalists, academics and NGO workers signing an online petition for him to be freed.
“Dong Yuyu is a talented reporter and author whose work has long been respected by colleagues,” said Ann Marie Lipinski, curator of the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard.
“We stand with many in hoping for his release and return to his family.”
In February, a Beijing court handed a suspended death sentence to Australian writer and pro-democracy blogger, Yang Hengjun, on espionage charges.


Social media companies, UNICEF slam Australia’s under-16 ban

Updated 29 November 2024
Follow

Social media companies, UNICEF slam Australia’s under-16 ban

  • Tech companies say the measure is littered with “many unanswered questions” ut they are willing to engage with the government on shaping its implementation
  • UNICEF Australia also warned that the law was no “silver bullet” against online harm and could push kids into “covert and unregulated” spaces online

MELBOURNE: Social media giants on Friday hit out at a landmark Australian law banning them from signing up under-16s, describing it as a rush job littered with “many unanswered questions.”
The UN children’s charity UNICEF Australia joined the fray, warning the law was no “silver bullet” against online harm and could push kids into “covert and unregulated” spaces online.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the legislation may not be implemented perfectly — much like existing age restrictions on alcohol — but it was “the right thing to do.”
The crackdown on sites like Facebook, Instagram and X, approved by parliament late Thursday, will lead to “better outcomes and less harm for young Australians,” he told reporters.
Platforms have a “social responsibility” to make children’s safety a priority, the prime minister said.
“We’ve got your back, is our message to Australian parents.”
Social media firms that fail to comply with the law face fines of up to Aus$50 million ($32.5 million).
TikTok said Friday it was “disappointed” in the law, accusing the government of ignoring mental health, online safety and youth experts who had opposed the ban.
“It’s entirely likely the ban could see young people pushed to darker corners of the Internet where no community guidelines, safety tools, or protections exist,” a TikTok spokesperson said.

Tech companies said that despite the law’s perceived shortcomings, they would engage with the government on shaping how it could be implemented in the next 12 months.
The legislation offers almost no details on how the rules will be enforced — prompting concern among experts that it will simply be a symbolic, unenforceable piece of legislation.
Meta — owner of Facebook and Instagram — called for consultation on the rules to ensure a “technically feasible outcome that does not place an onerous burden on parents and teens.”
But the company added it was concerned “about the process, which rushed the legislation through while failing to properly consider the evidence, what industry already does to ensure age-appropriate experiences, and the voices of young people.”
A Snapchat spokesperson said the company had raised “serious concerns” about the law and that “many unanswered questions” remained about how it would work.
But the company said it would engage closely with government to develop an approach balancing “privacy, safety and practicality.”
“As always, Snap will comply with any applicable laws and regulations in Australia,” it said.
UNICEF Australia policy chief Katie Maskiell said young people need to be protected online but also need to be included in the digital world.
“This ban risks pushing children into increasingly covert and unregulated online spaces as well as preventing them from accessing aspects of the online world essential to their wellbeing,” she said.

One of the biggest issues will be privacy — what age-verification information is used, how it is collected and by whom.
Social media companies remain adamant that age-verification should be the job of app stores, but the government believes tech platforms should be responsible.
Exemptions will likely be granted to some companies, such as WhatsApp and YouTube, which teenagers may need to use for recreation, school work or other reasons.
The legislation will be closely monitored by other countries, with many weighing whether to implement similar bans.
Lawmakers from Spain to Florida have proposed social media bans for young teens, although none of the measures have been implemented yet.
China has restricted access for minors since 2021, with under-14s not allowed to spend more than 40 minutes a day on Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok.
Online gaming time for children is also limited in China.


Canada sues Google over alleged anticompetitive practices in online ads

Updated 29 November 2024
Follow

Canada sues Google over alleged anticompetitive practices in online ads

  • The Competition Bureau is asking a tribunal to order Google to sell its ad tech tools, which it uses "unlawfully" to maintain its dominant market position
  • Google maintains the online advertising market is a highly competitive sector and that it intends to defend itself against the allegation

TORONTO: Canada’s antitrust watchdog said Thursday it is suing Google over alleged anticompetitive conduct in the tech giant’s online advertising business and wants the company to sell off two of its ad tech services and pay a penalty.
The Competition Bureau said that such action is necessary because an investigation into Google found that the company “unlawfully” tied together its ad tech tools to maintain its dominant market position.
The matter is now headed for the Competition Tribunal, a quasi-judicial body that hears cases brought forward by the competition commissioner about non-compliance with the Competition Act.
The bureau is asking the tribunal to order Google to sell its publisher ad server, DoubleClick for Publishers, and its ad exchange, AdX. It estimates Google holds a market share of 90 percent in publisher ad servers, 70 percent in advertiser networks, 60 percent in demand-side platforms and 50 percent in ad exchanges.
This dominance, the bureau said, has discouraged competition from rivals, inhibited innovation, inflated advertising costs and reduced publisher revenues.
“Google has abused its dominant position in online advertising in Canada by engaging in conduct that locks market participants into using its own ad tech tools, excluding competitors, and distorting the competitive process,” Matthew Boswell, Commissioner of Competition, said in a statement.
Google, however, maintains the online advertising market is a highly competitive sector.
Dan Taylor, Google’s vice president of global ads, said in a statement that the bureau’s complaint “ignores the intense competition where ad buyers and sellers have plenty of choice.”
The statement added that Google intends to defend itself against the allegation.
US regulators want a federal judge to break up Google to prevent the company from continuing to squash competition through its dominant search engine after a court found it had maintained an abusive monopoly over the past decade.
The proposed breakup, floated in a 23-page document filed this month by the US Department of Justice, calls for sweeping punishments that would include a sale of Google’s industry-leading Chrome web browser and impose restrictions to prevent Android from favoring its own search engine.


Australia passes landmark social media ban for under 16s

Updated 28 November 2024
Follow

Australia passes landmark social media ban for under 16s

  • Aussie premier Anthony Albanese chapioned the bill in an effort to take young Australians “off their phones”
  • Critics say the ban would not “make social media safer for young people,” lacks details about its enforcement

MELBOURNE: Australian lawmakers passed landmark rules to ban under 16s from social media on Thursday, approving one of the world’s toughest crackdowns on popular sites like Facebook, Instagram and X.
The legislation ordering social media firms to take “reasonable steps” to prevent young teens from having accounts was passed in the Senate with 34 votes in favor and 19 against.
The firms — who face fines of up to Aus$50 million ($32.5 million) for failing to comply — have described the laws as “vague,” “problematic” and “rushed.”
The new rules will now return to the lower house — where lawmakers already backed the bill on Wednesday — for one final approval before it is all but certain to become law.
Speaking during the Senate debate, Greens politician Sarah Hanson-Young said the ban would not “make social media safer for young people.”
She said it was “devastating” that young people were “finding themselves addicted to these dangerous algorithms.”
Center-left Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, eyeing an election early next year, has enthusiastically championed the new rules and rallied Aussie parents to get behind it.
In the run up to the vote, he painted social media as “a platform for peer pressure, a driver of anxiety, a vehicle for scammers and, worst of all, a tool for online predators.”
He wanted young Australians “off their phones and onto the footy and cricket field, the tennis and netball courts, in the swimming pool.”
But young social media users, like 12-year-old Angus Lydom, are not impressed.
“I’d like to keep using it. And it’ll be a weird feeling to not have it, and be able to talk to all my friends at home,” he told AFP.
Many are likely to try to find ways around it.
“I’ll find a way. And so will all my other friends” Lydom said.
Similarly, 11-year-old Elsie Arkinstall said there was still a place for social media, particularly for children wanting to watch tutorials about baking or art.
“Kids and teens should be able to explore those techniques because you can’t learn all those things from books,” she added.

On paper, the ban is one of the strictest in the world.
But the current legislation offers almost no details on how the rules will be enforced — prompting concern among experts that it will simply be a symbolic piece of legislation that is unenforceable.
It will be at least 12 months before the details are worked out by regulators and the ban comes into effect.
Some companies will likely be granted exemptions, such as WhatsApp and YouTube, which teenagers may need to use for recreation, school work or other reasons.
Late amendments were introduced to ensure government-issued digital ID cannot be used as a means of age verification.
Social media expert Susan Grantham told AFP that digital literacy programs that teach children to think “critically” about what they see online should be adopted — similar to a model used in Finland.
The legislation will be closely monitored by other countries, with many weighing whether to implement similar bans.
Lawmakers from Spain to Florida have proposed social media bans for young teens, although none of the measures have been implemented yet.
China has restricted access for minors since 2021, with under-14s not allowed to spend more than 40 minutes a day on Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok.
Online gaming time for children is also limited in China.


Microsoft faces wide-ranging US antitrust probe

Updated 28 November 2024
Follow

Microsoft faces wide-ranging US antitrust probe

  • Competitors complain Microsoft locks customers into its cloud service
  • FTC earlier set the stage for probe into Microsoft’s role in AI market

The US Federal Trade Commission has opened a broad antitrust investigation into Microsoft, including of its software licensing and cloud computing businesses, a source familiar with the matter said on Wednesday.
The probe was approved by FTC Chair Lina Khan ahead of her likely departure in January. The election of Donald Trump as US president, and the expectation he will appoint a fellow Republican with a softer approach toward business, leaves the outcome of the investigation up in the air.
The FTC is examining allegations the software giant is potentially abusing its market power in productivity software by imposing punitive licensing terms to prevent customers from moving their data from its Azure cloud service to other competitive platforms, sources confirmed earlier this month.
The FTC is also looking at practices related to cybersecurity and artificial intelligence products, the source said on Wednesday.
Microsoft declined to comment on Wednesday.
Competitors have criticized Microsoft’s practices they say keep customers locked into its cloud offering, Azure. The FTC fielded such complaints last year as it examined the cloud computing market.
NetChoice, a lobbying group that represents online companies including Amazon and Google, which compete with Microsoft in cloud computing, criticized Microsoft’s licensing policies, and its integration of AI tools into its Office and Outlook.
“Given that Microsoft is the world’s largest software company, dominating in productivity and operating systems software, the scale and consequences of its licensing decisions are extraordinary,” the group said.
Google in September complained to the European Commission about Microsoft’s practices, saying it made customers pay a 400 percent mark-up to keep running Windows Server on rival cloud computing operators, and gave them later and more limited security updates.
The FTC has demanded a broad range of detailed information from Microsoft, Bloomberg reported earlier on Wednesday.
The agency had already claimed jurisdiction over probes into Microsoft and OpenAI over competition in artificial intelligence, and started looking into Microsoft’s $650 million deal with AI startup Inflection AI.
Microsoft has been somewhat of an exception to US antitrust regulators’ recent campaign against allegedly anticompetitive practices at Big Tech companies.
Facebook owner Meta Platforms, Apple, and Amazon.com Inc. have all been accused by the US of unlawfully maintaining monopolies.
Alphabet’s Google is facing two lawsuits, including one where a judge found it unlawfully thwarted competition among online search engines.
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella testified at Google’s trial, saying the search giant was using exclusive deals with publishers to lock up content used to train artificial intelligence.
It is unclear whether Trump will ease up on Big Tech, whose first administration launched several Big Tech probes. JD Vance, the incoming vice president, has expressed concern about the power the companies wield over public discourse.
Still, Microsoft has benefited from Trump policies in the past.
In 2019, the Pentagon awarded it a $10 billion cloud computing contract that Amazon had widely been expected to win. Amazon later alleged that Trump exerted improper pressure on military officials to steer the contract away from its Amazon Web Services unit.