Two American Muslims ‘kicked off’ Alaska Airlines plane file lawsuit

Image: Shutterstock
Short Url
Updated 11 August 2022
Follow

Two American Muslims ‘kicked off’ Alaska Airlines plane file lawsuit

  • - Abobakkr Dirar and Mohamed Elamin claim texting and speaking in Arabic caused furor
  • - Compensation sought for ‘Islamophobic, racist and xenophobic’ actions

CHICAGO: Two Muslim American passengers filed a lawsuit this week against Alaska Airlines for allegedly kicking them off a flight, saying they were victims of racist discrimination and dissatisfied with the company’s promise to investigate the humiliation they faced.

Abobakkr Dirar and Mohamed Elamin, American citizens of Sudanese heritage, were seated in the first-class section of Flight #304 waiting for departure from Seattle to San Francisco on Feb. 17, 2020, when they were removed from the airplane, allegedly for speaking and texting in Arabic.

While they waited for takeoff, they spoke to each other and texted friends in their native language. Another passenger who overheard them speaking Arabic and saw some of their texts became “alarmed” and complained to a flight attendant, according to the lawsuit that was filed in the Western District of the State of Washington.

Dirar and Elamin were immediately escorted off the plane with the excuse of having “ticketing issues” by uniformed law enforcement personnel. Once off the flight, the two men spoke with an FBI agent called to the scene who copied and translated their text messages, later determining that they “posed no threat,” according to the lawsuit.

Although the other passengers eventually departed on the flight, Dirar and Elamin were rebooked hours later in downgraded economy class seats, and prohibited from flying together. They were each booked on separate flights.

After they complained, they were told that Alaska Airlines would investigate, but after two years of no action, Dirar and Elamin decided on Aug. 2 this year to take their complaint to a Federal Court alleging civil rights violations.

“Through its actions, Defendant (Alaska Airlines Inc.) essentially weaponized Islamophobic, racist, and xenophobic fears by using Plaintiffs as human props in an admittedly unjustified, unnecessary, and self-serving display of discriminatory security theater,” the lawsuit explains.

“By the time Plaintiffs finally reached their destination, they were too humiliated and traumatized by Defendant’s actions to enjoy their trip. Their trauma was exacerbated by knowing that such public mistreatment would give credence to Islamophobic, racist, and xenophobic beliefs which have plagued the Muslim community in the United States for decades. The emotional distress Plaintiffs suffered continues to impact them to this day, and they are retraumatized each time they consider booking a flight.”

The lawsuit further alleges: “As a result of Defendant’s discriminatory abuse on February 17, 2020, Plaintiffs have felt immense pressure to take precautions in travel which non-Arabic/Middle Eastern travelers do not have to consider and which no traveler should ever have to take.”

The precautions include actions “specifically designed to conceal and downplay their identity and avoid similar discriminatory abuse in air travel, (and) include: avoiding air travel whenever possible and, thereby, enduring long distance road trips and suffering the physical discomfort, inconvenience, loss of time, and added financial costs associated with such trips.”

They also claim that they now are forced to arrive “at the airport hours earlier than customary to account for delays from potential repeat discriminatory abuse; avoiding use of their cell phones and keeping them powered off in airports and on airplanes whenever possible; and avoiding speaking in their native Arabic in airports and on airplanes as much as possible.”

Alaska Airlines released a statement after the lawsuit was filed, stating: “Alaska Airlines strictly prohibits unlawful discrimination. We take such complaints very seriously. Our greatest responsibility is to ensure that our flight operations are safe, every day.”

The 25-page lawsuit was filed by attorneys Luis Segura and Lena F. Masri who work with CAIR, the Council on American Islamic Relations.

Segura and Masri allege in the lawsuit that after the two individuals were removed from the plane, employees were instructed to remove all the “tanks” from its toilets, and they also discussed bringing in a K-9 unit to check the aircraft.

All this occurred even though Port of Seattle Police Officer Andrew Neisinger “spoke with an unnamed Alaska Airlines manager” who reported that the incident was “a misunderstanding between passengers,” that “everything was fine,” “there was no threat of any kind,” and that “police were no longer needed.”

The lawsuit demands that Alaska Airlines provide “racial and religious sensitivity training to all employees,” prevent further discrimination against other passengers based on “their religion, race, color, ethnicity, alienage or national origin,” and award the two plaintiffs unspecified financial and punitive damages to be determined by a court trial, in addition to attorney fees.

The incidents of Arab and Muslim Americans being escorted off flights, especially since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, have been quite common, Arab and Muslim American organizations have reported.

Five incidents occurred in the weeks after Sept. 11, 2001, in which Muslims were told they had to leave their seats and exit aircraft.

In March 2016, an Arab American family was forced off a United Airlines flight after the mother, wearing a hijab, asked for a strap to secure a booster seat for her child. Instead, the family was told to leave the plane.

The following month in April 2016, a UC Berkley researcher was removed from a flight after other passengers complained when he spoke in Arabic.

The American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee reported that similar incidents have occurred on other airlines including Allegiant, Spirit, Delta, JetBlue, American Airlines and Southwest Airlines.


Air India crash: Pilot groups push back against human error narrative

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

Air India crash: Pilot groups push back against human error narrative

  • Initial probe finds aircraft’s engine fuel switches were turned off, but does not specify by whom
  • Pilots reject report as ‘inconclusive,’ say it leads media and public to ‘jump to conclusions’

NEW DELHI: Associations of Indian pilots are rejecting claims that last month’s Air India plane crash that killed 260 people was due to human error, after a preliminary investigation sparked speculation implicating the flight crew.

The London-bound Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner crashed less than a minute after taking off from Ahmedabad airport in the western Indian state of Gujarat on June 12.

A report released over the weekend by India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau said that seconds after take-off, both of the plane’s fuel-control switches moved to the position stopping fuel from the engines.

It did not specify who turned off the switches, only citing the cockpit voice recording, in which “one of the pilots is heard asking the other why he cut off,” while “the other pilot responded that he did not do so.”

The Indian Commercial Pilots Association and the Airline Pilots’ Association of India have issued statements after the release of the initial findings — and the first media and online reactions to it — rejecting speculative narratives and presumptions over the guilt of the pilots.

Capt. Kishore Chinta, an ALPA member and accident investigator, told Arab News that both associations have “raised red flags on the selective release of information” by the AAIB, which has “left the scope of ambiguity for people to jump to conclusions” and for the media to spin narratives.

“We are left defending those pilots who are not there to defend themselves,” he said. “The Western media has been painting them as if they actually committed suicide-murder.”

The London-bound flight was carrying 242 people — 230 passengers, two pilots and 10 crew members. Only one person, sitting in an emergency exit seat, survived the crash. Another 18 people were killed on the ground as the aircraft fell on a B. J. Medical College and hostel for students and resident doctors of the Ahmedabad Civil Hospital.

Investigators at the crash site recovered both components of the black box — the cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder, days after the crash. The Ministry of Civil Aviation said at the time that the final report was expected within three months.

The early release of preliminary findings has shaken the Indian aviation community, for which it was unacceptable that experienced pilots who have flown thousands of hours would have turned off the fuel supply.

“Definitely a malfunction caused the disaster — poor maintenance or a hardware/software glitch,” said Sandeep Jain, an Indian aviator based in the US.

“Dead pilots are always the easiest target. They don’t bite back. No litigation, no shareholder value erosion.”

The Federation of Indian Pilots is planning to raise the consequences of the preliminary report with the government.

“We will be taking it up with the government no doubt. We will not let it go quietly. The report should not be open-ended,” Capt. C.S. Randhawa, the federation’s president, told Arab News.

“It is inconclusive. So many things are not answered properly. The report does not say that the pilots have moved the fuel control switches, that is why it is inconclusive, and it is leading to speculations.”


Ukraine’s prime minister Shmyhal resigns

Updated 47 min 20 sec ago
Follow

Ukraine’s prime minister Shmyhal resigns

  • Zelensky nominated First Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko for the post

KYIV: Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal said on Tuesday he had filed a resignation letter, as a part of a major governmental reshuffle expected this week.

President Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday nominated First Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko for the post.


Philippines to strengthen migrant workers’ protection in labor deal with Oman

Updated 46 min 13 sec ago
Follow

Philippines to strengthen migrant workers’ protection in labor deal with Oman

  • Philippines, Oman plan to sign new MoU on labor cooperation in January
  • Muscat also wants to boost ties beyond labor, explore business opportunities

MANILA: The Philippines is strengthening labor cooperation with Oman to protect the rights and welfare of Filipino workers, its Department of Migrant Workers said following a meeting with the Omani labor minister in Manila.

The majority of over 2 million overseas Filipinos live and work in Gulf countries. 

While most are based in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, some 50,000 are in Oman, contributing over $340 million in annual remittance inflows to the Philippines. 

Oman’s Foreign Minister Sayyid Badr Al-Busaidi and Labor Minister Mahad bin Said Ba’awin were in the Philippines earlier this week to discuss ways to further relations.  

In a meeting with Philippine Migrant Workers Secretary Hans Leo Cacdac on Monday, they held talks over a new agreement on labor cooperation. 

“A key highlight of the meeting was the pending Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on Labor Cooperation, set to be signed by January 2026,” the department said in a statement. 

“The MOU establishes safeguards for Filipino workers through ethical recruitment standards, fair employment terms, joint dispute resolution mechanisms, and regular monitoring through a bilateral Joint Committee.” 

According to the DMW, Oman is “actively seeking Filipino domestic workers technicians, port staff, and other skilled professionals,” which could mean new employment pathways for Filipino migrant workers who are qualified. 

The Philippines is also seeking to incorporate technology to streamline recruitment and deployment of overseas Filipino workers to Oman. 

“By forging digital partnerships with host countries like Oman, we can make recruitment faster, more transparent, and more worker-friendly. Tech solutions can ensure every step is secure, accountable, and focused on protecting OFWs,” Cacdac said.

While labor relations have been a key aspect of Philippine-Omani ties, the Gulf state is now seeking to also explore business and investment opportunities with Manila. 

“For many decades, Oman has been a popular destination for overseas Filipino workers, who have found not just employment but a second home in our country,” Al-Busaidi said at the inaugural Oman-Cebu Investment Forum over the weekend. 

“Beyond the labor relations that have long defined our relations, we now open our arms to the business communities and investors of both our nations.”

A “new chapter” of Philippine-Oman relations is possible thanks to the connections created by Filipino migrant workers, he added, while urging Philippine and Omani businesses to collaborate. 

“Together, we can craft a future where the thousands of people to people connections created by the overseas Filipino workers can serve as a foundation for a flourishing economic partnership, and a new era of mutual investment,” Al-Busaidi said. 

“I invite you all to seize this opportunity and make it a beautiful and rewarding new chapter in the story of Oman and the Philippines.”


UK says thousands of Afghans brought to Britain under secret resettlement program

Updated 15 July 2025
Follow

UK says thousands of Afghans brought to Britain under secret resettlement program

  • The government now plans to close the secret route
  • About 36,000 more Afghans have been relocated to the UK under other resettlement routes

LONDON: Thousands of Afghans including many who worked with British forces have been secretly resettled in the UK after a leak of data on their identities raised fears that they could be targeted by the Taliban, the British government revealed Tuesday.

The government now plans to close the secret route.

Defense Secretary John Healey said a dataset containing the personal information of nearly 19,000 Afghans who had applied to come to Britain after the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan was released in error in 2022, and extracts were later published online.

That prompted the then-Conservative government to set up a secret program to resettle the Afghans. The government obtained a court order known as a superinjunction that barred anyone from revealing its existence.

The injunction was lifted on Tuesday in conjunction with a decision by Britain’s current Labour Party government to make the program public. It said an independent review had found little evidence that the leaked data would expose Afghans to greater risk of retribution from the Taliban.

“I have felt deeply concerned about the lack of transparency to Parliament and the public,” Healey told lawmakers in the House of Commons.

About 4,500 people – 900 applicants and approximately 3,600 family members — have been brought to Britain under the secret program, and about 6,900 people are expected to be relocated by the time it closes, at a total cost of 850 million pounds ($1.1 billion).

About 36,000 more Afghans have been relocated to the UK under other resettlement routes.

British troops were sent to Afghanistan as part of a deployment against Al-Qaeda and Taliban forces in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. At the peak of the operation there were almost 10,000 British troops in the country, mostly in Helmand province in the south. Britain ended combat operations in 2014.


‘Existential hour’ for Palestine at 30-country conference in Colombia

Updated 15 July 2025
Follow

‘Existential hour’ for Palestine at 30-country conference in Colombia

  • UN special rapporteur: ‘The time has come to act in pursuit of justice and peace’
  • Participants will lay groundwork for implementing UNGA motion calling for end to occupation

LONDON: A 30-country conference aimed at ending Israel’s occupation of Palestine is one of the most significant political developments of the past 20 months, UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese has said.

The two-day event starts on Tuesday in the Colombian capital Bogota, and will be attended by representatives from countries including China, Spain and Qatar.

Albanese will announce that the conference comes at “an existential hour,” The Guardian reported on Tuesday.

Participating countries will use the event to lay the groundwork for implementing a UN General Assembly motion calling on member states to pressure Israel into ending its illegal occupation of Palestine.

The motion included a deadline of September for putting into action the International Court of Justice’s 2024 opinion that found Israel’s occupation of Palestine to be unlawful.

The court’s advisory opinion last July called on Israel to end its occupation “as rapidly as possible.”

UN member states also have an obligation “not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by Israel’s illegal presence in the occupied Palestinian territory,” it found.

Conference host Gustavo Petro, Colombia’s president, said the meeting will demonstrate a global will to move from condemnation to collective action against Israel.

In an article for The Guardian last week, he said: “We can either stand firm in defense of the legal principles that seek to prevent war and conflict, or watch helplessly as the international system collapses under the weight of unchecked power politics.”

The Hague Group behind the conference was initially established by Colombia and South Africa, but now includes Spain, Qatar, Indonesia, Algeria and Brazil.

The group met in January at a nine-country conference and agreed to implement the ICJ’s provisional measures.

Albanese will tell the Bogota meeting: “For too long, international law has been treated as optional — applied selectively to those perceived as weak, ignored by those acting as the powerful. This double standard has eroded the very foundations of the legal order. That era must end.

“The world will remember what we, states and individuals, did in this moment — whether we recoiled in fear or rose in defense of human dignity.

“Here in Bogota, a growing number of states have the opportunity to break the silence and revert to a path of legality by finally saying: enough. Enough impunity. Enough empty rhetoric. Enough exceptionalism. Enough complicity.

“The time has come to act in pursuit of justice and peace — grounded in rights and freedoms for all, and not mere privileges for some, at the expense of the annihilation of others.”