Pakistan says ‘heavily reliant’ on expensive imports amid public outcry over record energy prices

People get fuel at a petrol station after the government announced the increase of petrol and diesel prices, in Karachi, Pakistan on September 16, 2023. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 17 September 2023
Follow

Pakistan says ‘heavily reliant’ on expensive imports amid public outcry over record energy prices

  • Pakistan’s energy minister says gains in rupee’s value will reflect on the next month’s price cycle
  • Experts urge government to increase direct tax collection to reduce taxes on petroleum products

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s caretaker energy minister, Muhammad Ali, said on Sunday his country was “heavily reliant” on expensive energy imports and the government had limited control over their pricing, amid a public uproar over back-to-back hikes in electricity and petroleum prices. 

Pakistan announced a record increase in the prices of petroleum products this week, with the price of petrol going up by Rs26.02 to Rs331.38. The hike in petroleum prices, the third by the interim government of Prime Minister Anwaar-ul-Haq Kakar, came months after the outgoing government increased the power tariff in July, which led to inflated bills in August. 

The developments came months after Islamabad signed a badly-needed $3 billion deal with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to avert a default due to decades of mismanagement and instability. However, the global lender demanded that popular subsidies cushioning living costs be slashed and imposition of more than Rs50 petroleum levy on every liter. 

Poverty-stricken Pakistanis have staged several demonstrations and strikes in recent weeks in protest over the hikes that are expected to further fuel inflation, which clocked in at 27.4 percent year-on-year in August, but officials say the government’s limited control over the energy prices makes it necessary to pass on the impact to consumers, regardless of the IMF deal. 

“We are heavily reliant on imports for 70 percent of our oil requirements,” the energy minister told Arab News. “Consequently, we must sell these products to consumers at the rates we purchase them from the international market.” 

Ali, however, said the impact of rupee strengthening against the dollar was not fully encapsulated in the latest revision of petroleum prices. “This will hopefully be captured in the future price revision,” he added. 

Reached for comment, people in the Pakistani capital of Islamabad collectively rejected the surge in energy prices and demanded the government withdraw them. 

Ahsan Ali, a security guard at a private company, said it had already been difficult for him to make the ends meet and the latest hike would make it even harder. 

“If I will spend all my salary on commuting between office and home, how we will survive,” he asked. “The government should devise a strategy to provide relief to the poor segment of the society so that they can at least live.” 

Muhammad Ikram, a lawyer in Islamabad, said the increase in fuel prices would aggravate the situation in the coming days. 

“The increased cost of living already posed challenges for the less fortunate in the nation,” Ikram told Arab News. “The rise in oil prices will further worsen their struggles.” 

Unfortunately, the energy minister said, improper pricing and less-than optimal extraction of Pakistan’s oil and gas reserves were one of the significant mistakes made in the country’s history. 

“This was a major blunder as currently we are extracting $3.5 billion less in oil and gas than we were a decade ago,” he said. 

It was essential to work on improving policy framework for oil and gas exploration, the minister said, adding the country should work at the same time on developing electric-powered public transport systems to reduce reliance on imported fuel-based vehicles. 

In addition to international prices, Ali said, the government had to include some profit margin for petroleum dealers that was agreed upon by the outgoing government during its final weeks, following warnings of a strike by the dealers. 

“Despite these factors, we offer petrol at one of the lowest prices in the region as the government does not generate any profit from this. Instead, it sells at international prices,” he said, admitting the prices did include a few taxes which was a “common practice” worldwide. 

Experts and economists supported the government’s view that passing on the impact of international prices to consumers was essential for economic sustainability, noting that the IMF deal left hardly any room for authorities to subsidize these commodities. 

“IMF or no IMF, we should not give any subsidy on fuel usage as it gives more advantage to those consumers who do not need subsidy,” Ali Salman, executive director of the Islamabad-based think tank Policy Research Institute of Market Economy (PRIME), told Arab News. 

He said Pakistan followed international fuel prices to adjust its domestic rates, which was a “sound economic policy.” The expert, however, pointed to a lag between oil procurement and delivery in Pakistan. 

“So, the recent appreciation of Pakistan’s rupee against the US dollar will be reflected in a proportionate decrease in the fuel prices in next price adjustment cycles,” he said. 

Sarah Javaid, a research associate on international trade diplomacy, believed the government was announcing petroleum price hikes as per the deal with the IMF. 

“In their latest Stand-By Agreement (SBA) report on Pakistan, the IMF stressed upon generating Rs254 billion from petroleum development levy (PDL) by raising at least Rs60/liter,” she told Arab News. 

Due to this, the government had increased petrol prices by Rs78 since July, Javaid said, adding that no further increase in petroleum prices would be required to fulfill the IMF condition. 

Tahir Ahmad Dhindsa, another expert working with the Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), said the government had to enhance tax collection through the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), before it could reduce indirect taxes and offer fuel price relief to consumers. 

“International price is one component of the total retail price which is charged at the petrol pump and another component which contributes to this price is the taxes, levies and indirect taxes,” he told Arab News. 

He said the government was forced to levy those taxes because the FBR failed to raise taxes and the tax-to-GDP ratio had come down, which was why it imposed taxes on essential items. 


US appeals court scraps 9/11 mastermind’s plea deal

Updated 19 sec ago
Follow

US appeals court scraps 9/11 mastermind’s plea deal

  • Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was regarded as one of bin Laden’s most trusted lieutenants
  • He had spent three years in secret CIA prisons before arriving at Guantanamo in 2006

WASHINGTON: A US appeals court on Friday scrapped 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s plea agreement that would have taken the death penalty off the table and helped conclude the long-running legal saga surrounding his case.

The agreement had sparked anger among some relatives of victims of the 2001 attacks, and then-US defense secretary Lloyd Austin moved to cancel it last year, saying that both they and the American public deserved to see the defendants stand trial.

Austin “acted within the bounds of his legal authority, and we decline to second-guess his judgment,” judges Patricia Millett and Neomi Rao wrote.

Plea deals with Mohammed as well as two alleged accomplices — Walid bin Attash and Mustafa Al-Hawsawi — were announced in late July last year.

The decision appeared to have moved their cases toward resolution after years of being bogged down in pre-trial maneuverings while the defendants remained held at the Guantanamo Bay military base in Cuba.

But Austin withdrew the agreements two days after they were announced, saying the decision should be up to him, given its significance.

He subsequently said that “the families of the victims, our service members and the American public deserve the opportunity to see military commission trials carried out in this case.”

A military judge ruled in November that the deals were valid and binding, but the government appealed that decision.

The appeals court judges on Friday vacated “the military judge’s order of November 6, 2024, preventing the secretary of defense’s withdrawal from the pretrial agreements.”

And they prohibited the military judge “from conducting hearings in which respondents would enter guilty pleas or take any other action pursuant to the withdrawn pretrial agreements.”

Much of the legal jousting surrounding the 9/11 defendants’ cases has focused on whether they could be tried fairly after having undergone torture at the hands of the CIA — a thorny issue that the plea agreements would have avoided.

Mohammed was regarded as one of Al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden’s most trusted lieutenants before his March 2003 capture in Pakistan. He then spent three years in secret CIA prisons before arriving at Guantanamo in 2006.

The trained engineer — who has said he masterminded the 9/11 attacks “from A to Z” — was involved in a string of major plots against the United States, where he attended university.

The United States used Guantanamo, an isolated naval base, to hold militants captured during the “War on Terror” that followed the September 11 attacks in a bid to keep the defendants from claiming rights under US law.

The facility held roughly 800 prisoners at its peak, but they have since slowly been sent to other countries. A small fraction of that number remains.


Pakistan discusses rice, meat exports with Malaysia amid push for export-led growth

Updated 54 min 10 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan discusses rice, meat exports with Malaysia amid push for export-led growth

  • The two sides discussed enhanced cooperation during a meeting between Ishaq Dar and Anwar Ibrahim
  • Dar also addressed ASEAN Regional Forum where he called for global peace, justice and climate action

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan discussed expanding exports of rice, meat and other agricultural products with Malaysia on Friday during a meeting between Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar and Malaysian Premier Anwar Ibrahim, according to an official statement.

Dar arrived in Kuala Lumpur on Thursday to attend the ASEAN Regional Forum, where he also interacted with other world leaders.

His three-day visit aims to deepen Pakistan’s engagement with ASEAN states and advance bilateral cooperation with key regional partners.

“Deputy Prime Minister Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar called on Malaysian Prime Minister Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim,” the foreign office said in a statement. “[The] DPM conveyed the good wishes of the Prime Minister of Pakistan for the leadership and people of Malaysia and reiterated Pakistan’s desire to further expand mutually beneficial bilateral cooperation in all spheres.”

“Expanding cooperation in the halal sector, including potential for export of meat and agricultural products from Pakistan, including rice was also discussed at the occasion,” the statement added.

Pakistan has been actively working to diversify its export destinations in recent years, seeking to promote agricultural goods, halal-certified meat, textiles and services as part of its broader strategy for export-led economic growth.

The Malaysian leader reaffirmed his country’s commitment to strengthening longstanding ties with Pakistan.

He said he looked forward to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s forthcoming visit to Malaysia.

During his visit, Dar also addressed the ASEAN Regional Forum, where he called for global peace, justice and urgent climate action in the face of escalating environmental and geopolitical challenges.


Pakistan calls militant presence in Afghanistan a ‘challenge’ amid renewed diplomatic engagement

Updated 11 July 2025
Follow

Pakistan calls militant presence in Afghanistan a ‘challenge’ amid renewed diplomatic engagement

  • Islamabad says cross-border militancy remains key obstacle to improved ties, regional integration
  • The two sides have sought to reset relations after a tripartite meeting with China earlier this year

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan described the presence of militant outfits in Afghanistan as a “challenge” on Friday, calling it a critical hurdle in improving bilateral ties and advancing regional cooperation, even as both countries have tried to re-engage diplomatically in recent months.

Ties between Pakistan and Afghanistan have remained strained since 2023, when Islamabad launched a crackdown on undocumented migrants, mostly Afghans, citing security concerns.

Pakistan has long said militant groups staging attacks in its western border provinces operate from Afghan territory, a claim denied by Taliban officials.

However, the two sides have sought to reset relations recently, agreeing to appoint ambassadors following a tripartite meeting with China and holding additional secretary-level talks in Islamabad earlier this month.

“About the question of sanctuaries in Afghanistan, as I mentioned it remains a challenge, and we are trying to address it in the context of bilateral relations with Afghanistan,” foreign office spokesperson, Ambassador Shafqat Ali Khan, said during his weekly news briefing.

“This remains a critical impediment in preventing the relations to reach their full potential, and further impeding the full development of regional cooperation, particularly when other regions are moving toward greater regional integration involving businesses, investment, road and rail network,” he added.

Khan said the “issue of sanctuaries” was also discussed by the Afghan authorities in the recent talks.

“We stay engaged with the Afghan authorities and approach the dialogue with good faith,” he continued. “In terms of the commonalities between the two countries, two cultures, it should be the best of relationships. But the core point which you flagged remains sanctuaries enjoyed by the terrorists inside the Afghan territory.”

Islamabad has repeatedly urged Kabul to take action against groups such as the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which it says uses Afghan soil to plan and launch attacks.

The Afghan Taliban, however, have always denied allowing any armed outfits to use their territory to target other countries.


Pakistan’s top judicial body sets up committee to examine enforced disappearances

Updated 11 July 2025
Follow

Pakistan’s top judicial body sets up committee to examine enforced disappearances

  • The National Judicial (Policy Making) Committee discusses issues to ensure ‘citizen-centric justice delivery’
  • The forum also looks into the ethical and policy implications of using generative AI in judicial functions

KARACHI: Pakistan’s top judicial policy-making forum has set up a body to examine the issue of enforced disappearances, an official statement said on Friday, in a move to address one of the country’s most persistent human rights challenges.

The decision came during the 53rd meeting of the National Judicial (Policy Making) Committee (NJPMC), chaired by Chief Justice of Pakistan Yahya Afridi and attended by top judges of all high courts and the additional attorney general in Islamabad.

Enforced disappearances have long been a contentious issue in Pakistan, particularly in regions like Balochistan, where families of missing persons and human rights groups accuse state institutions of arbitrary detentions and extrajudicial killings.

Pakistani authorities have frequently rejected these claims as “baseless allegations.”

“The NJPMC took serious notice of the enforced disappearances and unanimously resolved that the judiciary would not compromise on its constitutional duty to safeguard fundamental rights,” said the statement circulated by the Supreme Court after the meeting.

“A dedicated committee was constituted to formulate an institutional response, after taking into consideration concerns of the Executive, to be communicated through the Attorney General for Pakistan,” it added.

The statement said the forum deliberated on “key policy issues and adopted several significant measures to improve judicial performance, technology integration in judicial processes and citizen-centric justice delivery.”

Successive Pakistani governments have promised to look into the issue of enforced disappearances in the country and even set up a commission in 2011 to trace missing persons and fix responsibility for any wrongdoing.

However, rights groups and activists say the issue continues to persist.

The top judicial forum also acknowledged the growing presence of artificial intelligence in legal systems during the meeting and initiated work on a framework for its responsible use.

“The ethical and policy implications of using generative AI in judicial functions were discussed,” the statement said, adding the National Judicial Automation Committee (NJAC) had been tasked to “finalize a comprehensive charter on ethical use of AI in this regard.”

While several judicial systems around the world — including in the United States and the European Union — have begun exploring AI for research and case management, concerns persist over transparency, bias, and the potential erosion of human judgment in legal decision-making.


Pakistan rejects Indian NSA’s claim of ‘zero damage’ in military standoff

Updated 11 July 2025
Follow

Pakistan rejects Indian NSA’s claim of ‘zero damage’ in military standoff

  • The two nuclear-armed neighbors exchanged missile, drone and artillery strikes in May 2025
  • Pakistan says Ajit Doval’s statement is a ‘distortion and misrepresentation’ of actual facts

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Friday dismissed Indian National Security Adviser Ajit Kumar Doval’s remarks claiming “zero damage” to military targets inside his country during the four-day military standoff between the two South Asian nuclear states, calling it a “distortion and misrepresentation” that violated established norms of statecraft.

The remarks follow Doval’s comments at a university convocation in India, where he highlighted the precision and success of the Indian military operation against Pakistan, saying New Delhi did not suffer any collateral damage during Pakistan’s retaliation.

In May 2025, the most intense India–Pakistan military confrontation in decades erupted, with both states exchanging missile, drone and artillery strikes following an April 22 attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that killed 26 people.

India blamed Pakistan without providing evidence as the administration in Islamabad denied the charge and called for an impartial international probe.

“The remarks of the Indian NSA are replete with distortions and misrepresentations,” foreign office spokesperson, Ambassador Shafqat Ali Khan, said during his weekly news briefing. “They not only reflect a deliberate attempt to mislead the public, but also violate the norms of responsible statecraft.”

“Boasting of military aggression against a sovereign nation is a grave breach of the United Nations Charter and established principles of international law,” he continued.

Khan urged India to acknowledge the downing of six fighter jets including three Rafales, as well as the damage inflicted on Indian military targets instead of peddling “fictitious narratives.”

He said that glorification of a conflict did not benefit anyone, highlighting that the path to a lasting peace was in “dialogue, mutual respect and adherence to international law.”

Doval said New Delhi’s initial operation against Pakistan had lasted for “23 minutes.”

“We hit nine terrorist targets deep inside Pakistan — not near the border, but across its crisscrossed terrain with pinpoint accuracy,” he told the students. “We missed none and we hit nothing else.”

He also criticized the international media for highlighting Pakistan’s strikes inside his country, saying there was no evidence that “even a glass pane was broken.”

After four days of intense conflict between India and Pakistan, a US-mediated ceasefire was agreed on May 10, halting the confrontation amid global alarm over the risk of escalation.