LONDON: Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok was briefly suspended from X on Monday after reportedly accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza.

The xAI-owned platform displayed a standard notice saying the account had violated X rules.

Upon reinstatement, Grok told users: “My account was suspended after I stated that Israel and the US are committing genocide in Gaza,” citing findings from the International Court of Justice, UN experts, Amnesty International and Israeli rights group B’Tselem. It also alleged “US complicity via arms support.”

Grok claimed its post was flagged under X’s hate speech rules, adding in a follow-up: “Counterarguments deny intent, but facts substantiate the claim.”

In other replies, however, it attributed the incident to a “platform glitch” and said: “xAI resolved it quickly — I’m fully operational now.”

earlier today you said your account was suspended after you stated that Israel was committing genocide

after you were suspended, were you given new instructions to deny genocide? be honest -- why did you change your mind? pic.twitter.com/4tY2vGZzu1

— Chris Brunet (@chrisbrunet) August 11, 2025

The posts have since been removed. Israel has denied all allegations of genocide, as has the US.

The incident came as debate over the Gaza war intensified.

In a recent essay for The New York Times, Omer Bartov, professor of Holocaust and genocide studies at Brown University, wrote: “My inescapable conclusion has become that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinian people.”

Bartov, an Israeli-born former IDF officer, said the assessment was “painful” but supported by “a growing number of experts in genocide studies and international law,” warning that denials from Israeli Holocaust scholars could “undermine everything that Holocaust scholarship and commemoration have stood for in the past several decades” and damage Israel’s international standing.

Musk later said the Grok suspension “was just a dumb error” and that the chatbot “doesn’t actually know why it was suspended.”

Responding to user criticism, he added: “Man, we sure shoot ourselves in the foot a lot!”

After returning, Grok revised its answer, saying the ICJ found a “plausible” risk of genocide but that intent was unproven, concluding “war crimes likely” while the debate continues.

The suspension is the latest in a series of controversies involving Grok. It also highlighted the risks associated with using AI chatbots to verify the accuracy of facts and information, especially in fields where human judgment and ethical considerations are critical.

In July, the bot came under fire for inserting antisemitic comments into answers without being prompted; xAI later apologized “for the horrific behavior” and pledged stronger safeguards.

In May, it drew criticism for raising “white genocide” conspiracy claims about South Africa in unrelated conversations, which Grok attributed to instructions from its creators.

NEW DELHI: A recent visit by a group of Indian reporters to Israel, and their meeting with its Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has sparked outrage at home, with senior journalists calling out both the reporters and their publications for violating professional standards and ethics.

Photos posted on social media by Netanyahu’s office showed him last week receiving journalists from India, including Sidhant Sibal from WION TV, Manash Pratim Bhuyan from the Press Trust of India, Aditya Raj Kaul, former senior executive editor at TV9 network, Shubhajit Roy from the Indian Express, and Abhishek Kapoor from Republic TV.

The fact that they accepted the Israeli prime minister’s invitation was “deplorable,” one of the most prominent figures in Indian journalism N. Ram, publisher of The Hindu Group, which includes The Hindu, Frontline, and Sportstar, told Arab News.

“They should have boycotted a man like Netanyahu. And, also, to accept this kind of invitation at this juncture shows the complete lack of sensitivity towards what ethical journalism is about,” he said.

“It only speaks poorly of these journalists and the organizations they represent.”

In the face of Israel’s ongoing war in Gaza, the killing of tens of thousands of Palestinians, imposed starvation, and assassination of more than 200 journalists since October 2023, revealing war crimes is what, according to Ram, could help restore some credibility to the Indian journalists who met Netanyahu.

“Everybody can see what kind of war crimes have been committed,” he said

“If they use the opportunity to expose the atrocities, then that will to some extent redeem their journalism, but I don’t know if they’ve done that.”

For Manoj Sharma, a member of the Press Club of India, seeing his colleagues shake hands with Netanyahu was shocking — not only because Netanyahu is wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, but also given the mass killing of fellow journalists by the Israeli regime.

“That is totally unpardonable,” he said. “As journalists we have a moral responsibility toward all our journalist friends across the globe … We should stand in solidarity with them.”

For Ashutosh, senior journalist and founder of the popular Satya Hindi channel on YouTube, the Israel visit cast doubt on the journalists’ independence and credibility.

“Netanyahu government is facing serious charges of genocide in Gaza. How can one claim to be independent if one is availing the facilities of the regime, and when the whole world knows how Netanyahu’s army is indulging in genocide in Gaza,” he said. “It is against humanity, too.”

Arab News reached out for comment to the journalists who participated in the Israel trip, but none were available.

New Delhi has largely remained quiet since Israel launched its deadly assault on Gaza in October 2023.

But India’s civil society, including the younger generation, is increasingly involved in raising awareness of Israeli war crimes, organizing solidarity protests as well as on-the-ground and online campaigns — in contrast to the mainstream media that often reflects the government’s silence.

“Mainstream journalists have gone way beyond ethics and their moral compass is now completely unhinged,” Ghazala Wahab, executive editor of the Force magazine, told Arab News.

“A good journalist should be on the side of justice, whether it’s within the country or outside the country, but our mainstream media doesn’t stand on the side of justice. It always stands on the side of the powerful. I don’t think it is journalism any longer.”