What the deaths of Hamas-held Israeli hostages in Gaza say about IDF rules of engagement

Three hostages who were abducted from Israeli communities near the Gaza border, from left, Alon Shamriz, Samer Al-Talalka and Yotam Haim. Israeli troops mistakenly shot the three hostages to death. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 22 December 2023
Follow

What the deaths of Hamas-held Israeli hostages in Gaza say about IDF rules of engagement

  • Alon Shamriz, Samer Talalka and Yotam Haim were mistakenly shot and killed by the Israeli military on Dec. 15
  • Critics claim the deadly incident is indicative of a lack of discipline and persistent disregard for civilian lives

LONDON: The Israeli military faces fresh accusations that it continues to disregard the rules of engagement during the war in Gaza, after its troops shot and killed three Israeli hostages last week.

Critics said the mistake was an inevitable result of the excessive reliance on violence by the Israel Defense Forces, or perhaps indiscipline.

That the three men were killed by would-be rescuers from their own side is tragedy enough. But the fact that the Israeli troops decided it was acceptable to open fire on unarmed individuals, who had their hands raised and were waving a white flag of surrender, shines a light on the brutal course of the war.

When they were killed in Gaza’s Shejaiya neighborhood on Dec. 15, the three men —Alon Shamriz, Samer Al-Talalka and Yotam Haim — were screaming for help in Hebrew and waving a white sheet daubed with the letters “SOS” as they approached soldiers.

The IDF was swift to denounce the killings as a breach of its own rules of engagement and said the three men had been “mistakenly identified … as a threat.” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu expressed his “deep sorrow” over their deaths.

However, Avi Shamriz, the father of one of the men who was killed, told NBC News the shootings indicated that the war was being fought without due regard for the safety and well-being of the hostages.

About 250 people were taken captive when Hamas militants attacked southern Israel on Oct. 7, killing 1,139 people, mostly civilians, according to updated Israeli figures.

More than 100 Israeli and foreign hostages were released in exchange for 240 Palestinian prisoners during a week-long truce last month, mediated by Qatar and Egypt.

As protests took place in Tel Aviv about the government’s handling of the hostage crisis, Herzi Halevi, chief of the general staff of Israel, clarified the rules of engagement in cases of surrender.

“You see two people, they have their hands up and no shirts, take two seconds,” Halevi told soldiers in reference to the shooting incident, during which all three of the men had removed their shirts to make it clear they were not wearing suicide vests.

“What if it is two Gazans with a white flag? Do we shoot? Absolutely not. Even those who fought but now put down their weapons and raise their hands, we capture, we don’t shoot.”




People join family members of hostages held by Hamas as they gather to protest outside the home of UN Secretary General António Guterres on December 15, 2023 in New York City. (AFP)

Despite the assurances, critics suggest the incident in which the hostages were killed is in keeping with the IDF’s controversial track record in the use of force and the prioritization of the security of Israelis in Gaza and other occupied Palestinian territories.

Citing data from the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, sources told Arab News that such behavior by Israeli military forces had resulted in the deaths of more than 5,300 Palestinians, largely caused by bombs and bullets, between 2008 and a month prior to the start of the current conflict.

Muhannad Ayyash, a professor of sociology at Mount Royal University in Calgary, Canada, said it was well-known that the Israeli military played fast and loose with the rules of engagement prior to the Oct. 7 Hamas attack.

Based on accounts given by Israeli officers, Ayyash said those rules have been loosened further still since the current conflict began, so as to “allow soldiers to make fewer checks before shooting at suspected enemies,” including in instances of apparent surrender.

“I trust the reports of these officers, based on the facts we have observed since then,” Ayyash told Arab News.

“For example, snipers are shooting civilians, including in hospitals, and there has been at least one reported mass execution of women, children and babies who were sheltering inside a school, as well as so many other examples.”




This handout picture released by the Israeli army on December 17, 2023 reportedly shows a makeshift sign reading in Hebrew “Help, 3 hostages” using leftover food remains by by the three Israeli hostages who were mistakenly killed by Israeli forces, found after searches in a building adjacent to where the incident took place. (AFP/Handout / Israeli Army

Ayyash and others have drawn a direct link between the accidental killing of Israeli hostages by the IDF and the apparent willingness of personnel to shoot Palestinians who pose no threat.

Such incidents include the shootings of Eyad Hallaq, a 32-year-old man with autism, in May 2020 and journalist Shireen Abu Akleh in May 2022.

Israeli human rights monitor B’Tselem also accuses Israeli troops of “illegally executing” two Palestinians, one of whom was incapacitated and the other unarmed, during a raid in the West Bank.

Roy Yellin, B’Tselem’s director of public outreach, told Time magazine that the killing of the three Israeli hostages on Dec. 15 was “heart-breaking but not surprising.”

Over the years, he said, his organization has documented “countless incidents of people who clearly surrendered and who were still shot,” in contravention of all rules of war, and with little in the way of punishment of those responsible to act as a deterrent and help prevent future incidents.

However, Kobi Michael, a senior researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies, an independent think tank affiliated with Tel Aviv University, and the Misgav Institute for National Security, rejected claims that such incidents are part of standard operating procedure of the IDF.




Palestinians transport a captured Israeli civilian from Kibbutz Kfar Azza, near the Gaza border, to the Gaza Strip on October 7, 2023. (AP)

“What happened in Shejaiya on Friday is an exception to the rule, a very sore exception, and I think everyone understands it was a mistake, a breach of regulations,” he told Arab News.

“But it is not indicative of the IDF’s widespread disregard. We have to understand it in the context. We are talking about an incident in a place where 10 Israeli soldiers and a senior commander were killed.

“This is an area full of Hamas fighters that are trying their utmost to confuse the IDF soldiers by deception. The soldiers have less than a second to make the call on whether to shoot or not to shoot. This is something that does not represent the Israeli rules of engagement.”

Michael added that the Israeli military “conforms to the law of war” and is making efforts to minimize civilian casualties, even at the expense of its own troops.

Hassan Ben Imran, a member of the board at UK-based human rights organization Law For Palestine, is unconvinced by this assessment.




Palestinians evacuate from a site hit by an Israeli bombardment on Rafah, southern Gaza Strip, Wednesday, Dec. 20, 2023. (AP)

“Such responses are like those you find within a guidebook that they all read from” rather than reflective of the reality on the ground, Imran told Arab News.

Testimonies by former IDF soldiers, documented by the Israeli veterans group Breaking the Silence, also suggest that incidents in which the rules of engagement were disregarded are more common and widespread than the Israeli government or its military would care to admit.

Avner Gvaryahu, who heads the group, told Time magazine he was “skeptical” of the IDF statement that the three Israeli hostages were killed in “violation of the rules of engagement.”

He said accounts from soldiers who served during previous military campaigns in the Gaza Strip indicated that once the IDF deems an area to have been “cleared of civilians,” soldiers are instructed to “shoot everything that moves.”

The IDF had sought to clear civilians from the area in which Shamriz, Al-Talalka and Haim were killed, declaring it an active combat zone. It remains unclear why the three men were there at all, one theory being they had managed to escape their captors.




This handout picture released by the Israeli army on December 21, 2023 shows soldiers operating in the Gaza Strip, amid continuing battles between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas. (AFP/Handout/Israeli Army)

“Anyone who thinks it is easy for soldiers to make split-second decisions in the chaos of urban combat is naive,” Geoffrey Corn, chair of criminal law and director of Texas Tech University’s Center for Military Law and Policy, told Arab News.

“The reality is mistakes happen in war all the time and, sadly, sometimes deliberate violation of rules also happen.

“Where this (incident) falls along this continuum is impossible to know at this point but no matter, it was a tragedy. If a mistake, it’s important to acknowledge Hamas’ pervasive disregard of the rules of war almost certainly influenced the soldiers’ reaction to what they saw and heard.

“This is why treachery and violating the rules of war in order to gain an advantage by exploiting compliance with the rules is itself a violation of international humanitarian law.”

Speaking at an event on Tuesday, US President Joe Biden said he recognizes that the IDF is facing an enemy with one goal: “The elimination, through the use of terror, of the entire state of Israel.”

But despite what he described as these “added burdens,” he said Israeli forces must differentiate between members of Hamas and Palestinian civilians, and urged them to minimize non-combatant deaths.

 


Gaza’s ancient Christian monastery gets ‘danger listing’ at UNESCO session in India

Updated 26 July 2024
Follow

Gaza’s ancient Christian monastery gets ‘danger listing’ at UNESCO session in India

  • Founded in 340, Saint Hilarion’s monastery is one of oldest in Middle East
  • UNESCO inscription processed in wake of Israel’s destruction of Palestinian heritage sites

NEW DELHI: An ancient Christian monastery in Gaza was recognized as a World Heritage in Danger site during a UNESCO session in New Delhi on Friday.

Founded in about 340 by Saint Hilarion, the monastery is part of Tell Umm Amer, an archaeological site located in the Nuseirat refugee camp of Gaza’s Deir Al-Balah governorate.

Submitted for inscription by the Permanent Delegation of Palestine to UNESCO in 2012, its nomination was processed on an emergency basis during the World Heritage Committee’s ongoing annual session.

Ambassador Mounir Anastas, Palestine’s permanent delegate to the UN cultural agency, welcomed the inscription as giving hope to the people of Gaza in the wake of the ongoing Israeli attacks, which since October have killed at least 40,000 people and destroyed most of the Palestinian enclave’s infrastructure.

 

 

“It constitutes a message of hope to our people in Gaza who are fleeing bombing, who have no shelter, no water, no food. Nevertheless, they are committed to protect their heritage because this heritage is part of our people’s memory and history,” Anastas told Arab News on the sidelines of the UNESCO session.

The move was submitted by Belgium and sponsored by 18 other members of the World Heritage Committee, who resorted to the emergency procedure provided for in the World Heritage Convention and agreed to inscribe the Saint Hilarion monastery complex on both the World Heritage and World Heritage in Danger lists.

Under the terms of the convention, its 195 states parties — including Israel — are barred from directly or indirectly damaging the site and are committed to providing their cooperation for its protection.

“Once the site is enshrined on the World Heritage in Danger list, this means that all state parties to the convention are responsible for the protection and promotion of the site,” Mounir said.

“And this is also another strong message from the international community to our people in Gaza, saying that the international community did not forget you.”

Saint Hilarion was a native of the Gaza region and is considered the father of Palestinian monasticism. His monastery used to be an important station on the crossroads between Egypt, Palestine, Syria and Mesopotamia, and is associated with the phenomenon of monastic desert centers during the Byzantine period. It also bears testimony to Christianity in Gaza.

One of the oldest monasteries in the Middle East, the complex consists of two churches, a burial site, a baptism hall, a public cemetery, an audience hall and dining rooms.

At least 207 archaeological sites and buildings of cultural and historical significance, out of a total of 320, have been reduced to rubble or severely damaged by Israel’s bombardment of the Gaza Strip over the past 10 months.

These include the Orthodox Church of Saint Porphyrios — the world’s third oldest church — the 12th century Great Omari Mosque and nearby Al-Qissariya medieval Old City market, Gaza’s ancient seaport dating to 800 B.C. and a Philistine cemetery dating to the Late Bronze period, 1550-1200 B.C.

The destruction of many of the archeological sites was detailed in South Africa’s case against Israel for the crime of genocide at the International Court. of Justice. The case argues that the mass killings and destruction of cultural heritage in Gaza demonstrate the Israeli leadership’s intent to destroy the Palestinian people and their cultural identity.


Russian warship docks in Algeria

Updated 58 min 34 sec ago
Follow

Russian warship docks in Algeria

  • Moscow and Algiers have close historic relations dating back to the Soviet era
  • The Russian navy frigate Admiral Gorshkov and a support vessel docked at the Port of Oran on Friday

MOSCOW: A Russian warship armed with advanced hypersonic missiles docked at a port in Algeria on Friday for a “business call,” the navy said.
Moscow and Algiers have close historic relations dating back to the Soviet era and have maintained strong defense and military ties amid Russia’s military offensive on Ukraine.
The Russian navy frigate Admiral Gorshkov and a support vessel docked at the Port of Oran on Friday, Russia’s Northern Fleet said in a statement.
“The visit of the Russian sailors will last several days,” it said.
The crews will take part in various protocol events, replenish food and water supplies, visit local attractions and rest on shore, it added.
The Admiral Gorshkov, equipped with hypersonic Zircon missiles, is currently on a long-distance voyage which has seen it cross the Atlantic and back, docking in Cuba and Venezuela.
“The ship, armed with high-precision missile weapons, is capable of delivering precise and powerful strikes against the enemy at sea and land,” Russia’s defense ministry said.
The voyage is intended to “demonstrate the flag and ensure naval presence in operationally important areas of the distant ocean zone,” it added.


Israel slams UN expert over Hitler-Netanyahu comparison

Updated 26 July 2024
Follow

Israel slams UN expert over Hitler-Netanyahu comparison

  • Francesca Albanese posted a picture of Hitler being celebrated by a crowd with Nazi salutes and cheers above a shot of Netanyahu

GENEVA: Israel on Friday slammed a UN rights expert for “anti-Semitism” after she endorsed a social media post comparing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Adolf Hitler.
Francesca Albanese, the United Nations special rapporteur on the rights situation in the Palestinian territories, has faced harsh criticism from Israel previously, especially after she in March accused the country of committing genocide in the war in Gaza.
On Thursday, she responded to a post on X, formerly Twitter, displaying a picture of Hitler being celebrated by a crowd with Nazi salutes and cheers above a shot of Netanyahu appearing to be greeted by US congressmen this week.
“History is always watching,” Craig Mokhiber, a former UN human rights official who resigned late last October accusing the world body of failing to prevent the “genocide” of Palestinian civilians in Gaza, wrote in the post.
“This is precisely what I was thinking today,” Albanese, an independent expert appointed by the UN Human Rights Council in 2022 but who does not speak on behalf of the United Nations, said in her response on Thursday.
Israel’s foreign ministry was quick to respond, slamming her on X as being “beyond redemption.”
“It is inconceivable that (Albanese) is still allowed to use the UN as a shield to spread anti-Semitism,” it said.
Israel’s mission to the UN in Geneva also chimed in.
“When a current UN ‘expert’ endorses Holocaust distortion spread by the former (UN rights office) director in New York... the system is rotten to its core,” it said.
“It’s high time to #UNseatAlbanese!“
Israel’s new ambassador in Geneva, Daniel Meron, used the same hashtag, decrying that “Francesca Albanese abuses her (UN) title to spread hatred and inflammatory rhetoric.”
Israel’s top ally the United States also weighed in.
“UN Special Rapporteur’s comparison of Benjamin Netanyahu to Adolf Hitler is reprehensible and antisemitic,” US ambassador to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva Michele Taylor said on X.
“There should be no place for such dehumanizing rhetoric. Special rapporteurs should be striving to improve human rights challenges, not inflame them.”
Albanese on Friday hit back at the criticism, insisting that “the memory of the Holocaust remains intact.”
“Institutional rants and outburst of selective moral outrage will not stop the course of justice, which is finally in motion.”
The Hamas attack that started the war on October 7 resulted in the deaths of 1,197 people in Israel, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official Israeli figures.
Out of 251 people taken hostage that day, 111 are still held in Gaza, including 39 the military says are dead.
Israel’s retaliatory offensive against Hamas has killed at least 39,175 Palestinians in Gaza, according to the Hamas-run territory’s health ministry.


WHO sends over 1 mln polio vaccines to Gaza to protect children

Updated 26 July 2024
Follow

WHO sends over 1 mln polio vaccines to Gaza to protect children

  • No cases of polio have been recorded yet, but WHO says action needed

GENEVA: The World Health Organization is sending more than one million polio vaccines to Gaza to be administered over the coming weeks to prevent children being infected after the virus was detected in sewage samples, its chief said on Friday.
“While no cases of polio have been recorded yet, without immediate action, it is just a matter of time before it reaches the thousands of children who have been left unprotected,” Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in an opinion piece in Britain’s The Guardian newspaper.
He wrote that children under five were most at risk from the viral disease, and especially infants under two since normal vaccination campaigns have been disrupted by more than nine months of conflict.
Poliomyelitis, which is spread mainly through the fecal-oral route, is a highly infectious virus that can invade the nervous system and cause paralysis. Cases of polio have declined by 99 percent worldwide since 1988 thanks to mass vaccination campaigns and efforts continue to eradicate it completely.
Israel’s military said on Sunday it would start offering the polio vaccine to soldiers serving in the Gaza Strip after remnants of the virus were found in test samples in the enclave.
Besides polio, the UN reported last week a widespread increase in cases of Hepatitis A, dysentery and gastroenteritis as sanitary conditions deteriorate in Gaza, with sewage spilling into the streets near some camps for displaced people.


UK must drop legal challenge against ICC arrest warrant for Netanyahu: HRW

Updated 26 July 2024
Follow

UK must drop legal challenge against ICC arrest warrant for Netanyahu: HRW

  • ‘Absolutely critical’ that new govt ‘lives up to rhetoric,’ says organization’s UK director
  • Court is seeking arrests of Israeli prime minister, defense minister

LONDON: The UK’s new government must drop the country’s legal challenge against the International Criminal Court’s seeking of arrest warrants against Israeli leaders, Human Rights Watch has said.

Rishi Sunak, the former UK prime minister, had challenged the court’s issuing of warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant earlier this year.

Karim Khan, the ICC’s top prosecutor, said there was a credible case that the two leaders could bear responsibility for crimes against humanity, The Guardian reported on Friday.

The UK director of HRW, Yasmine Ahmed, said it is “absolutely critical” that the country’s new Prime Minister Keir Starmer withdraws the legal challenge against the ICC.

The Guardian reported two weeks ago that the new government was expected to drop the case.

However, senior British diplomats later disputed the rumors, saying the decision “remained under review.”

The new UK government has until July 26 to decide whether to carry on with the legal challenge, under ICC guidelines.

Ahmed told The Guardian that the Labour government must pursue “progressive realism,” an ideology proposed by the new Foreign Secretary David Lammy.

She asked: “Will the UK government be principled and mature enough and adhere to its own statements of complying with and acting consistently with international law and supporting the rules-based order by withdrawing its application to intervene in the case of the ICC? It will be now for us to see where the rubber will hit the road.

“It is an incredibly complex world that they are addressing. We’re seeing a number of crises on a level I don’t know we’ve seen in decades.”

Ahmed praised Labour’s decision this week to resume British funding of the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East.

That decision leaves the US as the only country yet to resume funding to UNRWA following the controversial boycott of the agency that began earlier this year.

“We cannot promote and be seen to be, or in fact be, promoting a rules-based order in international law if we’re not also replicating that domestically,” said Ahmed. “We need to give (the government) an opportunity to live up to their rhetoric.”