MOSCOW: Russians are flocking to catch what some fear could be a final glimpse of the embalmed body of Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin before his tomb on Moscow’s Red Square, long a place of pilgrimage for communists, closes for repairs until 2027.
The mausoleum, which houses a waxy-looking Lenin replete in a three-piece suit inside what is purportedly a bullet-proof, blast-proof glass case, is due to be structurally overhauled after an inspection uncovered problems.
Once a popular attraction for Western tourists and still a favorite for Russians visiting the capital from the regions, the red and black granite structure is expected to close in the coming weeks, with repair work set to last until June 2027.
Officials say that the body of Lenin, who died in 1924 after helping to establish the world’s first socialist state, is not going anywhere and that the central hall where he lies in state will not be touched.
But news of the temporary closure has seen long lines form to get into the mausoleum, with some visitors fearing it could be their last chance to see Lenin.
“From a historical point of view, I want to witness his being in a mausoleum because I think Lenin will be buried at some point, maybe in the future or near future,” said Tatyana Tolstik, a historian from Ulyanovsk, the city on the Volga where Lenin was born.
A young woman called Snezhana, who did not give her surname, said she wanted to “dive into the past” because she was also unsure how long it would be possible to visit the mausoleum.
The Communist Party, which ruled the country from the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, is fiercely opposed to the removal of Lenin’s body, and Gennady Zyuganov, the party’s veteran leader, has said President Vladimir Putin has assured him it will not happen on his watch.
The Kremlin has repeatedly denied plans to permanently close the mausoleum.

LONDON: UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office staff have been told to quit their jobs if they disagree with government policy on Gaza.

More than 300 civil servants signed a letter sent to Foreign Secretary David Lammy last month, outlining concerns over UK arms sales and “complicity” in “stark … disregard for international law” by the Israeli military in the Palestinian enclave.

In a response to the letter, sent by the department’s two most senior civil servants Nick Dyer and Sir Oliver Robbins, signatories were told: “(If) your disagreement with any aspect of government policy or action is profound your ultimate recourse is to resign from the Civil Service. This is an honourable course.”

One official who signed the initial complaint told the BBC: “(There is) frustration and a deep sense of disappointment that the space for challenge is being further shut down.”

The letter is the fourth such case of civil servants contacting senior officials to air concerns about the UK’s position on the war in Gaza.

Signatories to it, which was sent on May 16, include overseas embassy staff and employees based in London.

Topics raised included potential breaches of international law, the death toll in Gaza, and Israeli settler activities in the occupied West Bank.

“In July 2024, staff expressed concern about Israel’s violations of international humanitarian law and potential UK government complicity. In the intervening period, the reality of Israel’s disregard for international law has become more stark,” the letter said.

It added that Israel’s actions, including its blockade on food aid entering Gaza, have led “many experts and humanitarian organisations to accuse Israel of using starvation as a weapon of war,” and that the UK is facilitating potential “violations of international law” by continuing to export weapons to the country.

The letter also noted that “the Israeli government has made explicit plans for the forcible transfer of Gaza’s population.”

In the response, Dyer and Sir Oliver said it “might be helpful” to “remind” signatories that the FCDO has systems in place to address staff concerns with policy, including the “ultimate recourse” of resignation.

The “bargain at the heart of the British Civil Service is that we sign up to deliver the policies of the Government of the day wholeheartedly, within the limits imposed by the law and the Civil Service Code,” they wrote.

A former FCDO official told the BBC that the rhetorical reply “simply provides the government with supposed ‘plausible deniability’ for enabling breaches of international law.”

The official added on condition of anonymity that the FCDO has not learned the lessons of the 2016 Chilcot Report after the Iraq War, which raised suggestions of “ingrained belief” within the civil service requiring systems to challenge “groupthink” in future.

The FCDO said in a statement: “There are systems in place which allow (staff) to raise concerns if they have them.”

A spokesperson added: “Since day one, this government has rigorously applied international law in relation to the war in Gaza.

“One of our first acts in government was to suspend export licenses that could be used by the Israel Defense Forces in Gaza.

“We have suspended direct exports of F-35 parts for use by Israel, and we categorically do not export any bombs or ammunition which could be used in Gaza.”

The UK government has previously said it believes Israel to be “at risk” of breaking international and humanitarian law in Gaza.

Last September, 30 export licenses for arms were suspended over fears of “clear risk” that they may be used illegally, but over 300 remain in place.

The war in Gaza has killed well over 50,000 Palestinians and left millions displaced and without access to basic resources.

Last year, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.