CHICAGO: Americans are seeing a significant uptick in discrimination against both the Jewish and Muslim communities, according to a survey by the PEW Research Center in Washington.
The survey, which was conducted in February and released this week, followed a separate study by PEW that explored American attitudes toward the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza. That showed that more younger Americans sympathized with the Palestinians, while more older Americans sympathized with Israel’s government.
PEW’s Associate Director Laura Silver said the two surveys showed that the Gaza war had not only fueled anti-Semitism and Islamophobia, but resulted in increased tensions between Jews and Muslims, with a measurable rise in blocking and unfriending on social media.
“When it comes to the share of Americans who say Jews face a lot of discrimination, the share who say this in the United States has doubled,” Silver told Arab News.
“Today, 40 percent say that, up from 20 percent who said the same in 2021. So, this is a pretty sharp increase.
“At the same time, we also see a somewhat larger share of Americans saying Muslims face a lot of discrimination. That is 44 percent and that is also up slightly, 5 percentage points since 2021, when 39 percent said the same. So, by and large, Americans perceive a fair bit of discrimination against Jews and Muslims and see this rising in society today.”
Silver said the survey showed that 70 percent of Muslims and 90 percent of Jews “say they have felt an increase in discrimination against their respective groups since the war began in October.”
An expert in international survey research, Silver said the surveys included how Americans were dealing with “permissible speech,” including speech opposing Israelis and Palestinians rights.
“We asked for examples about speech that opposes Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state or speech that opposes Palestinians having their own state. And we see that actually large shares of Americans think this kind of speech should be allowed even if it offends others,” she said.
“But then there are limits to this. The vast majority of Americans don’t believe that violence against Jews or violence against Muslims should be allowed.
“You can say things that might offend others but you cannot call for violence seems to be how the majority of Americans feel.”
The survey also explores how people react to comments made on social media about the Israel-Hamas war.
“We find that there are large shares, particularly of Jews or Muslims, who feel offended by something they have either seen on the news or on social media,” Silver said.
“So, it is 74 percent of US Jews and 60 percent of US Muslims who felt offended by something they saw on the news or social media that they saw on the Israel-Hamas war. So that is large shares.”
Silver said that about 25 percent of Jews and Muslims acknowledged that they had cut off contacts with others because of anger over the conflict.
“About a quarter of both groups have stopped talking to someone or unfollowed or blocked someone because of something that they said about the war in particular. That is a high share of people who are offended to the point of cutting off ties,” Silver said.
“The Israel-Hamas war makes people, especially Jews and Muslims, feel more afraid, sad, angry and exhausted. Specifically, fear. A higher share of Jews and Muslims feel afraid when they receive news about the war than the general public.”
She continued: “A majority of Americans see that Israel has valid reasons for fighting the Israel-Hamas war, but many fewer are saying the way they are fighting is acceptable.
“When it comes to the acceptability in the way Israel is carrying out its response to Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack, 38 percent call it acceptable, 34 percent unacceptable and 26 percent not sure.
“So, a large majority say that Israel has a valid reason for fighting but many fewer call its tactics acceptable. The same is true when it comes to Hamas, though smaller shares say either it has valid reasons for fighting or that the tactics of Oct. 7 are acceptable. But there is a gap there where more see kind of the reason behind it as valid than say the way they attacked is acceptable.”
Silver said younger Americans differed from older Americans.
“Younger Americans are much more likely to say they have sympathies with the Palestinian people relative to the Israeli people. Much more likely to have positive views of the Palestinian people than the Israeli people. They have very negative views of the Israeli government.
“Americans by and large are much less supportive of providing military assistance to Israel than they are of providing humanitarian assistance to Gaza.”
The survey, which was conducted between Feb. 13-25 among a nationally representative sample of 12,693 adults, includes an oversample of American Jews and Muslims. It also probed the public’s views on the limits of free speech related to the war but allowed the views of Jewish and Muslim respondents to be analyzed separately.
You can view the latest survey of American attitudes on discrimination against Jews and Muslims posted on April 2 by clicking this link. You can view the PEW survey of American attitudes on the Israel-Hamas war posted on March 21 by clicking here.
Jews and Muslims face rising discrimination in wake of Gaza war
https://arab.news/n8zbn
Jews and Muslims face rising discrimination in wake of Gaza war
- An expert in international survey research, Silver said the surveys included how Americans were dealing with “permissible speech,” including speech opposing Israelis and Palestinians rights
- The survey also explores how people react to comments made on social media about the Israel-Hamas war
Israel says to end ‘administrative detention’ for West Bank settlers
- Practice allows for detainees to be held for long periods without being charged or appear in court
- The Palestinian Prisoners Club advocacy group said in August that 3,432 Palestinians were held in administrative detention
The practice allows for detainees to be held for long periods without being charged or appear in court, and is often used against Palestinians who Israel deems security threats.
Defense Minister Israel Katz said it was “inappropriate” for Israel to employ administrative detention against settlers who “face severe Palestinian terror threats and unjustified international sanctions.”
But, according to settlement watchdog Peace Now, it is one of only few effective tools that Israeli authorities to prevent settler attacks against Palestinians, which have surged in the West Bank over the past year.
Katz said in a statement issued by his office that prosecution or “other preventive measures” would be used to deal with criminal acts in the West Bank.
B’Tselem, an Israeli rights group, said authorities use administrative detention “extensively and routinely” to hold thousands of Palestinians for lengthy periods of time.
The Palestinian Prisoners Club advocacy group said in August that 3,432 Palestinians were held in administrative detention.
Israeli daily Haaretz reported on Friday that eight settlers were held under the same practice in November.
Yonatan Mizrahi, director of settlement watch for Peace Now, said that although administrative detention was mostly used in the West Bank to detain Palestinians, it was one of the few effective tools for temporarily removing the threat of settler violence through detention.
“The cancelation of administrative detention orders for settlers alone is a cynical... move that whitewashes and normalizes escalating Jewish terrorism under the cover of war,” the group said in a statement, referring to a spike in settler attacks throughout the Israel-Hamas conflict over the past 13 months.
Western governments, including Israel’s ally and military backer the United States, have recently imposed sanctions on Israeli settlers and settler organizations over ties to violence against Palestinians.
On Monday, US authorities announced sanctions against Amana, a movement that backs settlement development, and others who have “ties to violent actors in the West Bank.”
“Amana is a key part of the Israeli extremist settlement movement and maintains ties to various persons previously sanctioned by the US government and its partners for perpetrating violence in the West Bank,” the US Treasury said.
Excluding Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem, the West Bank — which Israel has occupied since 1967 — is home to three million Palestinians as well as about 490,000 Israelis living in settlements that are illegal under international law.
UK would arrest Netanyahu over ICC warrant: Senior politician
- Emily Thornberry: Britain has ‘obligation under Rome Convention’ to arrest Israeli PM if he enters country
- Court: ‘Reasonable grounds to believe’ Netanyahu responsible for war crimes, crimes against humanity in Gaza
LONDON: The UK will arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he enters the country, a senior British politician has said.
The International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu on Thursday for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity, alongside his former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, pertaining to the Gaza war.
Emily Thornberry — Labour chair of the foreign affairs committee, and former shadow foreign secretary and shadow attorney general — told Sky News: “If Netanyahu comes to Britain, our obligation under the Rome Convention would be to arrest him under the warrant from the ICC.
“(It is) not really a question of should — we are required to, because we are members of the ICC.”
UK Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has refused to be drawn on whether Netanyahu would be arrested if he set foot on British soil, saying it “wouldn’t be appropriate for me to comment.”
She told Sky: “We’ve always respected the importance of international law, but in the majority of the cases that they pursue, they don’t become part of the British legal process.
“What I can say is that obviously, the UK government’s position remains that we believe the focus should be on getting a ceasefire in Gaza.”
Netanyahu’s arrest warrant is the first to be issued against the premier of a major Western ally by an international court for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.
His office denounced the warrant as “anti-Semitic,” adding that Israel “rejects with disgust the absurd and false actions.” Israel is not an ICC member and rejects the court’s jurisdiction.
US President Joe Biden called the warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant “outrageous,” adding: “Whatever the ICC might imply, there is no equivalence — none — between Israel and Hamas.”
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said he plans to invite Netanyahu to visit Budapest, adding that the arrest warrant will “not be observed” by his government.
The Italian and French governments, however, have indicated that Netanyahu will be arrested if he visits either country.
The ICC said on Thursday it has “reasonable grounds to believe” that Netanyahu and Gallant “bear criminal responsibility” for “the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts.”
The court also issued a warrant for Hamas commander Mohammed Diab Ibrahim Al-Masri for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Israel says Al-Masri, believed to have been the mastermind behind the Hamas attack of Oct. 7, 2023, was killed in Gaza earlier this year.
The ICC said it issued the warrant for his arrest because of insufficient evidence to prove his death.
Monitor raises toll in Israel strikes on Syria’s Palmyra to 92
- Wednesday’s Israeli attack targeted three sites in Palmyra, with one hitting a meeting of pro-Iranian groups
- Since civil war erupted in Syria in 2011, Israel has carried out hundreds of strikes in the country
BEIRUT: A Syria war monitor said on Friday that Israeli strikes on the city of Palmyra this week killed 92 pro-Iran fighters, after a United Nations representative said they were likely the deadliest to date.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said Wednesday’s attack targeted three sites in Palmyra, with one hitting a meeting of pro-Iranian groups that also involved commanders from Iraq’s Al-Nujaba group and Lebanon’s Hezbollah.
The toll has risen to “92 dead: 61 Syrian pro-Iran fighters,” 11 of them working for Hezbollah, “and 27 foreign nationals mostly from Al-Nujaba, plus four from Hezbollah,” the Observatory said.
The Britain-based war monitor, which relies on a network of sources inside Syria, had previously reported 82 dead, while the Syria defense ministry on Wednesday said 36 people were killed.
The UN deputy special envoy to Syria, Najat Rochdi, told the Security Council on Thursday that the raid was “likely the deadliest Israeli strike in Syria to date.”
The Observatory said the strikes also targeted “a weapons depot near the industrial area” in Palmyra, a modern city adjacent to globally renowned Greco-Roman ruins.
Since civil war erupted in Syria in 2011, Israel has carried out hundreds of strikes in the country, mainly targeting the army and Iran-backed groups.
Israel rarely comments on individual strikes in Syria but has repeatedly said it will not allow Iran to expand its presence in the country.
The Israeli military has intensified its strikes on targets in Syria since almost a year of hostilities with Iran-backed Hezbollah in neighboring Lebanon escalated into full-scale war in late September.
Iran Guards chief says Netanyahu ICC warrant ‘political death’ of Israel
- Revolutionary Guards chief General Hossein Salami calls the ICC warrant ‘a welcome move’
- Salami adds it is a ‘great victory for the Palestinian and Lebanese resistance movements’
TEHRAN: The head of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards on Friday described the arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and a former defense minister as the “end and political death” of Israel, in a speech.
“This means the end and political death of the Zionist regime, a regime that today lives in absolute political isolation in the world and its officials can no longer travel to other countries,” Revolutionary Guards chief General Hossein Salami said in the speech aired on state TV.
In the first official reaction by Iran, Salami called the ICC warrant “a welcome move” and a “great victory for the Palestinian and Lebanese resistance movements,” both supported by the Islamic republic.
Israel and its allies criticized the ICC’s decision to issue an arrest warrant on Thursday for Israeli Premier Benjamin Netanyahu and the country’s former defense minister Yoav Gallant.
The court also issued a warrant for the arrest of Hamas’s military chief Mohammed Deif.
The warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant were issued in response to accusations of crimes against humanity and war crimes during Israel’s war against Hamas in the Gaza Strip, sparked by the Palestinian militant group’s attack on Israel on October 7, 2023.
The move drew angry reactions from Netanyahu, who denounced it as antisemitic and from Israel’s closest allies, including the United States, but was welcomed by rights groups including Amnesty International.
The ICC’s move theoretically limits the movement of Netanyahu, as any of the court’s 124 national members would be obliged to arrest him on their territory.
The court’s chief prosecutor Karim Khan urged the body’s members to act on the warrants, and for non-members to work together in “upholding international law.”
Israel armys say ‘eliminated’ five Hamas militants in north Gaza raid
- Israeli military: Slain militants had ‘led the murders and kidnappings in the area of Mefalsim’
JERUSALEM: The Israeli military said on Friday it had “eliminated” five Hamas militants, including two commanders, in an overnight raid in northern Gaza’s Beit Lahia.
In a statement, the military and the Shin Bet security agency said they had “eliminated five Hamas terrorists, including a Nukhba (commando) company commander and an additional company commander who participated in the Oct. 7 massacre” that sparked the Gaza war last year, adding that the slain militants had “led the murders and kidnappings in the area of Mefalsim,” a kibbutz in southern Israel.