With its new pact with North Korea, Russia raises the stakes with the West over Ukraine

In this photo provided by the North Korean government, Russia's President Vladimir Putin, right, drives a car with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un sitting in front passenger seat at a garden of the Kumsusan State Guest House in Pyongyang, North Korea Wednesday, June 19, 2024. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 24 June 2024
Follow

With its new pact with North Korea, Russia raises the stakes with the West over Ukraine

  • The new agreement with Pyongyang marked the strongest link between Moscow and Pyongyang since the end of the Cold War

MOSCOW: Behind the smiles, the balloons and the red-carpet pageantry of President Vladimir Putin’s visit to North Korea last week, a strong signal came through: In the spiraling confrontation with the US and its allies over Ukraine, the Russian leader is willing to challenge Western interests like never before.
The pact that he signed with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un envisions mutual military assistance between Moscow and Pyongyang if either is attacked. Putin also announced for the first time that Russia could provide weapons to the isolated country, a move that could destabilize the Korean Peninsula and reverberate far beyond.
He described the potential arms shipments as a response to NATO allies providing Ukraine with longer-range weapons to attack Russia. He bluntly declared that Moscow has nothing to lose and is prepared to go “to the end” to achieve its goals in Ukraine.
Putin’s moves added to concerns in Washington and Seoul about what they see as an alliance in which North Korea provides Moscow with badly needed munitions for its war in Ukraine in exchange for economic assistance and technology transfers that would enhance the threat posed by Kim’s nuclear weapons and missile program.
A landmark pact
The new agreement with Pyongyang marked the strongest link between Moscow and Pyongyang since the end of the Cold War.
Kim said it raised bilateral relations to the level of an alliance, while Putin was more cautious, noting the pledge of mutual military assistance mirrored a 1961 treaty between the Soviet Union and North Korea. That agreement was discarded after the Soviet collapse and replaced with a weaker one in 2000 when Putin first visited Pyongyang.
Stephen Sestanovich, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations noted that when Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev signed the deal with Pyongyang in 1961, he also tested the world’s biggest nuclear bomb, built the Berlin Wall and probably started thinking about moves that led to the Cuban missile crisis in 1962.
“The question for Western policymakers now is whether Putin is becoming comparably reckless,” Sestanovich said in a commentary. “His language in North Korea — where he denounced the United States as a ‘worldwide neocolonialist dictatorship’ — might make you think so.”
South Korea responded by declaring it would consider sending arms to Ukraine in a major policy change for Seoul, which so far only has sent humanitarian assistance to Kyiv under a longstanding policy of not supplying weapons to countries engaged in conflict.
Putin insisted Seoul has nothing to worry about, since the new pact only envisions military assistance in case of aggression and should act as a deterrent to prevent a conflict. He strongly warned South Korea against providing lethal weapons to Ukraine, saying it would be a “very big mistake.”
“If that happens, then we will also make corresponding decisions that will hardly please the current leadership of South Korea,” he said.
Asked whether North Korean troops could fight alongside Russian forces in Ukraine under the pact, Putin said there was no need for that.
Potential weapons for Pyongyang
Last month, Putin warned that Russia could provide long-range weapons to others to hit Western targets in response to NATO allies allowing Ukraine to use its allies’ arms to make limited attacks inside Russian territory.
He followed up on that warning Thursday with an explicit threat to provide weapons to North Korea.
“I wouldn’t exclude that in view of our agreements with the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea,” Putin said, adding that Moscow could mirror the arguments by NATO allies that it’s up to Ukraine to decide how to use Western weapons.
“We can similarly say that we supply something to somebody but have no control over what happens afterward,” Putin said. “Let them think about it.”
Sue Mi Terry, senior fellow for Korea studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, warned that Moscow could share weapons technologies with Pyongyang to help improve its ballistic missile capabilities, noting there is evidence of this happening already, with Russia possibly providing help to North Korea with its successful satellite launch in November, two months after Kim last met Putin.
“This is deeply concerning because of the substantial overlap between the technologies used for space launches and intercontinental ballistic missiles,” Terry said in a commentary. “Russia can also provide North Korea with critical help in areas where its capabilities are still nascent, such as submarine-launched ballistic missiles.”
While raising the prospect of arms supplies to Pyongyang that would violate UN sanctions, Putin also said Russia would take efforts at the world body to ease the restrictions — an apparent signal that Moscow may try to keep arms supplies to Pyongyang under the radar and maintain a degree of deniability to avoid accusations of breaching the sanctions.
Russia and North Korea have rejected assertions by the US and its allies that Pyongyang has given Moscow ballistic missiles and millions of artillery shells for use in Ukraine.
Going ‘to the end’ in a confrontation with the West
By explicitly linking prospective arms shipments to Pyongyang to Western moves on Ukraine, Putin warned Kyiv’s allies to back off as he pushes his goals in the war — or face a new round of confrontation.
“They are escalating the situation, apparently expecting that we will get scared at some point, and at the same time, they say that they want to inflict a strategic defeat on Russia on the battlefield,” Putin said. “For Russia, it will mean an end to its statehood, an end to the millennium-long history of the Russian state. And a question arises: Why should we be afraid? Isn’t it better, then, to go to the end?”
Alexander Gabuev, director of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center in Berlin, said Putin’s statement reflected an attempt to discourage the US and its allies from ramping up support for Kyiv as Russia pushes new offensives in several sectors of the front line.
“The situation is becoming increasingly dangerous, and Russia believes that it should quickly rap the West over its knuckles to show that its deeper engagement in the war will have a price,” he said in remarks carried by Dozhd, an independent Russian broadcaster.
He noted that Putin’s statement that Moscow wouldn’t know where its arms end up if sent to Pyongyang could have been a hint at North Korea’s role as an arms exporter.
Treading cautiously with China
Putin’s visits to North Korea handed a new challenge to Pyongyang’s top ally, China, potentially allowing Kim to hedge his bets and reduce his excessive reliance on Beijing.
China so far has avoided comment on the new pact, but many experts argue that Beijing won’t like losing sway over its neighbor.
Ever since Putin invaded Ukraine, Russia has come to increasingly depend on China as the main market for its energy exports and the source of high-tech technologies in the face of Western sanctions. While forging a revamped relationship with Pyongyang, the Kremlin will likely tread cautiously to avoid angering Beijing.
“Whether this upgraded Russia–North Korea relationship will be without limits depends upon China,” which will watch events closely, said Edward Howell of Chatham House in a commentary. “Beijing will have taken stern note of Kim Jong Un’s claim that Russia is North Korea’s ‘most honest friend.’ Despite the likely increase in cooperation in advanced military technology between Moscow and Pyongyang, China remains North Korea’s largest economic partner.”

 


Father and stepmother jailed for 10-year-old Sara Sharif’s murder after UK trial

Updated 17 December 2024
Follow

Father and stepmother jailed for 10-year-old Sara Sharif’s murder after UK trial

  • Sharif was found dead in August 2023 at her home in Woking after ‘serious and repeated violence’
  • The family fled to Pakistan after Sharif was killed, before they were arrested last year in September

LONDON: The father and stepmother of Sara Sharif, a 10-year-old girl who was found dead in her home in Britain, were on Tuesday jailed for 40 and 33 years respectively for her murder after a trial which heard harrowing details of Sara’s treatment.
Sharif was found dead in August 2023 at her home in Woking, a town southwest of London, after what prosecutors said was a campaign of “serious and repeated violence.”
The family fled to Pakistan immediately after Sara Sharif was killed, before they were arrested in September 2023 at London’s Gatwick airport after flying from Dubai.
Prosecutor Bill Emlyn Jones told jurors at the start of the trial that Sara had suffered injuries including burns, multiple broken bones and bite marks.
Sara’s father Urfan Sharif, 43, and his wife Beinash Batool, 30, stood trial at London’s Old Bailey court charged with her murder, which they denied.
Last week, the jury convicted Urfan Sharif and Batool of Sara’s murder. Sara’s uncle Faisal Malik, 29, was found not guilty of murder but guilty of causing or allowing Sara’s death.
Sharif and Batool appeared in the dock at the Old Bailey, where they heard a statement read on behalf of Sara’s mother Olga Domin who called them “executioners.”
“You are sadists, although even this word is not enough for you,” her statement read. “I would say you are executioners.”
Judge John Cavanagh sentenced Sharif to a minimum of 40 years in prison and Batool to a minimum of 33 years. Malik was sentenced to 16 years.
“The courts at the Old Bailey have been witness to many accounts of awful crimes, but few can have been more terrible than the account of the despicable treatment of this poor child that the jury in this case have had to endure,” Cavanagh said.
“It is no exaggeration to describe the campaign of abuse against Sara as torture.”


Father and stepmother jailed in UK for 10-year-old Sara Sharif's murder

Urfan Sharif, Beinash Batool and Faisal Malik, respectively father, stepmother, and uncle of murdered British-Pakistani girl Sar
Updated 17 December 2024
Follow

Father and stepmother jailed in UK for 10-year-old Sara Sharif's murder

  • Sara Sharif was killed after campaign of 'serious and repeated violence'
  • Urfan Sharif and Beinash Batool jailed for 40 and 33 years respectively

LONDON: The father and stepmother of Sara Sharif, a 10-year-old girl who was found dead in her home in Britain, were on Tuesday jailed for 40 and 33 years respectively for her murder after a trial which heard harrowing details of Sara’s treatment.
Sharif was found dead in August 2023 at her home in Woking, a town southwest of London, after what prosecutors said was a campaign of “serious and repeated violence.”
The family fled to Pakistan immediately after Sara Sharif was killed, before they were arrested in September 2023 at London’s Gatwick airport after flying from Dubai.
Prosecutor Bill Emlyn Jones told jurors at the start of the trial that Sara had suffered injuries including burns, multiple broken bones and bite marks.
Sara’s father Urfan Sharif, 43, and his wife Beinash Batool, 30, stood trial at London’s Old Bailey court charged with her murder, which they denied.
Last week, the jury convicted Urfan Sharif and Batool of Sara’s murder. Sara’s uncle Faisal Malik, 29, was found not guilty of murder but guilty of causing or allowing Sara’s death.
Sharif and Batool appeared in the dock at the Old Bailey, where they heard a statement read on behalf of Sara’s mother Olga Domin who called them “executioners.”
“You are sadists, although even this word is not enough for you,” her statement read. “I would say you are executioners.”
Judge John Cavanagh sentenced Sharif to a minimum of 40 years in prison and Batool to a minimum of 33 years. Malik was sentenced to 16 years.
“The courts at the Old Bailey have been witness to many accounts of awful crimes, but few can have been more terrible than the account of the despicable treatment of this poor child that the jury in this case have had to endure,” Cavanagh said.
“It is no exaggeration to describe the campaign of abuse against Sara as torture.”


Serving the forgotten: Delhi woman performs last rites for city’s abandoned dead

Updated 17 December 2024
Follow

Serving the forgotten: Delhi woman performs last rites for city’s abandoned dead

  • Pooja Sharma has performed funeral rites for more than 5,000 people since 2022
  • She is featured on the BBC’s list of 100 inspirational women around the world

NEW DELHI: Pooja Sharma’s life was turned upside down when her older brother was killed, leaving her with a tragic responsibility that soon became a mission of serving those no one thought to serve — New Delhi’s unclaimed dead.

The 27-year-old spends most of her time collecting bodies released from mortuaries by the police and taking them to a crematorium for their final dignified farewell.

“My elder brother was shot dead in front of my eyes because of a small tiff with some goons. No one came to help me out. When I took him to the hospital, he was declared dead and my father went into a coma. When my brother’s dead body came home from the hospital there was no male member to perform the last rites,” Sharma told Arab News.

“I did the last rites of my brother, tying a turban on my head. When I went to the cremation ground to collect his ashes, I started crying inconsolably. That day I took a vow that, from now on, no dead body will go unattended to the cremation ground.”

Quitting her job as an HIV counsellor at a government hospital, she established Bright the Soul Foundation, which has since helped perform funerary rites for more than 5,000 people.

“I perform the last rites not only for Hindus, but also Christians and Muslims and other religions too,” Sharma said.

“God has made us human, and we deserve respect both while living and while dead. I want to serve the dead.”

Delhi police data shows that thousands of unidentified bodies are found in the city every year. After an investigation and attempts to locate relatives, officers either bury them in mass graves or cremate them. Or they call Sharma.

She performs funeral rites for about eight people every day and tries to raise awareness on her Instagram page and the foundation’s website, hoping she will be able to expand the reach of her service.

“I want to spread the wings of my organization across the country so that the orphaned dead bodies can get their respect and decent cremation. There are some states which are really poor, and poor people when they die, they don’t get their due respect. They are buried or cremated in a very rude manner,” Sharma said.

“I feel it’s important that the dead bodies also get their rights, and they should be buried with full religious and ritual rites.”

Earlier this month, Sharma’s work was recognized when the BBC included her on its 2024 “100 Women” list of inspiring and influential women from around the world.

She hopes the recognition will help more women enter the service of final rites and destigmatize their presence. Sharma herself has faced resistance from priests and the wider community as the role is traditionally held by men in Hinduism.

She has also sacrificed her personal life in pursuit of her mission.

Living with her father and grandmother, who also financially support her work, Sharma does not feel accepted by society at large.

“People don’t talk to me normally. They are scared of me, and they don’t mingle with me. Even my childhood friends have also stopped talking to me. They say that their parents have stopped them from talking to me, and they say that if they talk to me, they will turn impure,” she said.

“This is a lonely journey for me, but I have accepted my fate ... My life is dedicated to the service of humanity.” 


Ireland ‘won’t be silenced’ over Israel’s conduct in Gaza

Updated 17 December 2024
Follow

Ireland ‘won’t be silenced’ over Israel’s conduct in Gaza

  • Taoiseach Simon Harris: ‘Scale of civilian deaths’ is ‘reprehensible’
  • Says he is proud of his country’s support for Palestinians

LONDON: Ireland’s leader has said his country will “not be silenced” in its criticism of Israel’s war in Gaza after Tel Aviv closed its Dublin embassy.

Taoiseach Simon Harris accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of “the diplomacy of distraction,” and said Ireland had unequivocally supported Israel’s right to defend itself.

But Harris leveled strong criticism of Israel’s conduct in Gaza, and said he is proud of Ireland’s support for the Palestinians.

“You know what I think is reprehensible? Killing children, I think that’s reprehensible,” he told reporters. “You know what I think is reprehensible? Seeing the scale of civilian deaths that we’ve seen in Gaza.

“You know what I think is reprehensible? People being left to starve and humanitarian aid not flowing.”

The embassy closure followed Ireland’s decision last week to support an International Court of Justice petition accusing Israel of genocide.

Irish Foreign Minister Micheal Martin said the decision had “not been motivated by anything other than respect for international humanitarian law.”

He added: “The utilisation of the international courts by Ireland … where there can be international accountability for war crimes in any part of the world, including in Gaza, should not be seen as a hostile act.”


US building support in UN for Houthi ship inspections: Envoy

Updated 17 December 2024
Follow

US building support in UN for Houthi ship inspections: Envoy

  • Existing UN mission has limited powers to inspect ships for weapons deliveries
  • Tim Lenderking: Washington also considering re-designating Yemeni militia as terrorist group

London: The US is building international support for a UN campaign to disrupt supplies heading for the Houthi militia in Yemen, Washington’s special envoy to the country has said.

Tim Lenderking added that the US is also considering re-designating the militia as a terrorist group.

Last week, he visited the UN Verification and Inspection Mission for Yemen, based in Djibouti on the opposite side of the Red Sea.

The mission’s focus is to inspect ships arriving in Houthi-controlled ports, to intercept weapons deliveries.

Though the UN Security Council has imposed an arms embargo, UNVIM, established in 2016, has limited means to interdict ships.

Lenderking said he is researching ways to make the mission more effective at preventing Houthi access to foreign weaponry.

The Houthis have said their Red Sea campaign is a stand of solidarity with Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.

The campaign will come to an end if a ceasefire is reached between Israel and Hamas, Houthi leaders have said.

“UNVIM is not equipped or given the mandate to do interdictions. We are working with partners to look at a change to the mandate,” Lenderking said.

“We all have to plug the holes, and that requires a different mindset and different sort of focus than simply escorting ships.”

The number of commercial ships transiting the Red Sea has halved in the past year due to the Houthi campaign. The US and UK militaries have staged a series of attacks on the militia’s positions in Yemen.

As a result, Houthi leaders are “much more careful how they are moving around,” said Lenderking. “They have altered their communications in light of the walkie talkie attacks on Hezbollah.”