Gaza journalist killed in alleged Israeli fire

Relatives mourn over the body of photojournalist Ibrahim Muhareb, who was killed as he was covering the advance of Israeli forces north of Khan Yunis, on the southern Gaza Strip the previous day, at Al-Nasser hospital on August 19, 2024, amid the ongoing battles between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 19 August 2024
Follow

Gaza journalist killed in alleged Israeli fire

  • About 30 people gathered on Monday at the hospital to stand around Muharab’s body, which was laid on the ground under a white plastic tarpaulin on which a bulletproof jacket marked “Press” was laid like a wreath, AFPTV footage showed

GAZA STRIP, Palestinian Territories: The health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza and a Palestinian news site said on Monday that a journalist was killed by Israeli fire the previous day in the south of the territory.
“Ibrahim Muharab’s body was taken to Nasser Hospital,” in the southern city of Khan Yunis Monday, the ministry said.
Palestinian Daily News, a website for which Muharab worked, announced his death “following shelling from the Israeli occupation on him and a group of journalists.”
It added that Muharab’s body was found on Monday morning in Hamad City, a large apartment complex built by Qatar and now in ruins.
Two other journalists who were with Muharab at the time were wounded and sent to Nasser Hospital in Khan Yunis, an AFP journalist on the ground reported.
Online videos that AFP could not separately authenticate show an Israeli armored vehicle advancing toward the Hamas neighborhood while bullets are being fired.
At least one man wearing a “Press” jacket can be seen running away from the shots before a voice can be heard saying “Ibrahim is wounded, where is he?“
About 30 people gathered on Monday at the hospital to stand around Muharab’s body, which was laid on the ground under a white plastic tarpaulin on which a bulletproof jacket marked “Press” was laid like a wreath, AFPTV footage showed.
Contacted by AFP, the Israeli army declined to comment on this specific case without receiving the geographic coordinates for the location of Muharab’s death and his identification card.
“The (Israeli army) has never, and will never, deliberately target journalists,” a spokesperson for the army told AFP.
The Palestinian Journalists Syndicate condemned Muharab’s “assassination” and accused the Israeli army of leading an “organized campaign... to kill journalists” in Gaza.
Gaza journalist Ibrahim Qanan, who was at the hospital, accused Israel of “killing the truth by trying to wipe out all traces of transmission toward the outside world of what is happening in the Gaza Strip.”
The Israeli army has killed several journalists in Gaza it accused of belonging to Hamas or Islamic Jihad’s armed branches.
The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) reported Monday that “at least 113 journalists and media workers” have been killed since the beginning of the war between Israel and Hamas that began on October 7
This constitutes the “deadliest period for journalists since the CPJ began gathering data in 1992.”
 

 


German news media demand access to war-torn Gaza

Updated 58 min 8 sec ago
Follow

German news media demand access to war-torn Gaza

  • ‘Anyone who prohibits us from working in the Gaza Strip is creating the conditions for human rights to be violated. We know the risk. We are prepared to take it. Grant us access to Gaza’
  • Signatories included editors and reporters from Der Spiegel, Die Welt, public broadcasters ARD and ZDF and the German Journalists Association

BERLIN: German news media outlets on Tuesday called on Israel to grant them access to war-torn Gaza, charging that the “almost complete exclusion of international media... is unprecedented in recent history.”
“After almost a year of war, we call on the Israeli government: allow us to enter the Gaza Strip,” a group of newspapers, agencies and broadcasters wrote in an open letter.
They also urged Egypt to permit them entry to the widely devastated Palestinian territory via the Rafah border crossing in the south of the Gaza Strip.
Israel has been at war with Hamas since the October 7 attack launched by the Palestinian militant group in a conflict that has brought mass casualties and destroyed swathes of the coastal strip.
The media organizations wrote that “anyone who makes independent reporting on this war impossible is damaging their own credibility.
“Anyone who prohibits us from working in the Gaza Strip is creating the conditions for human rights to be violated.”
The open letter was addressed to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi and had been delivered on Monday, they said.
Signatories included editors and reporters from Der Spiegel, Die Welt, public broadcasters ARD and ZDF and the German Journalists Association.
They said they have decades of experience in conflict reporting and wrote: “We know the risk. We are prepared to take it. Grant us access to the Gaza Strip. Let us work, in the interest of everyone.”
The October 7 attack on southern Israel resulted in the deaths of 1,205 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official Israeli figures.
Militants also seized 251 hostages, 97 of whom are still held in Gaza, including 33 the Israeli military says are dead.
Israel’s retaliatory military offensive has killed at least 41,226 people in Gaza, according to the Hamas-run territory’s health ministry, which does not provide a breakdown of civilian and militant deaths.

 


Israeli parliament to debate controversial bill on incitement to terrorism investigations

Updated 17 September 2024
Follow

Israeli parliament to debate controversial bill on incitement to terrorism investigations

  • Proposed bill would make it illegal to praise an individual who committed a terrorist act, not just the act itself
  • Legislation to suppress free speech, target Arab citizens for political reasons, rights groups say

LONDON: A controversial bill that would allow Israeli police to investigate alleged incitement to terrorism without prior approval from the Office of the State Attorney is advancing through the Knesset.

Civil rights groups and opposition members of the Knesset have voiced concerns over the proposed legislation, warning that it could lead to abuses of power and restrictions on freedom of speech.

Currently, police must seek approval from the state attorney to investigate such cases, a safeguard intended to prevent broad interpretations of the law that could suppress free expression.

In July, State Attorney Amit Aisman revealed that police had initiated several investigations into incitement or speech-related offenses without proper authorization, accusing officers of “deliberately circumventing” his office’s directives.

The bill, introduced by far-right MK Limor Son Har Melech of the ultranationalist Otzma Yehudit party, passed its first reading in the Knesset in July.

Melech has since added a clause tightening the law, making it illegal to praise an individual who committed a terrorist act, rather than just the act itself.

If the bill is enacted, police could launch investigations based on formal complaints “or in any other manner,” expanding their ability to probe incitement to terrorism.

A scheduled hearing on the bill in the Knesset’s Constitution, Law and Justice Committee was postponed to accommodate scheduling conflicts, with a new date set for later this week.

Criticism of the bill has come from across Israeli society, with many arguing it could be exploited for political purposes.

MK Gilad Kariv of the Labor Party described the legislation as a “powerful takeover” of police powers by National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, an ultranationalist settler leader.

Kariv warned that the bill could lead to “endless investigations” aimed at intimidating political opponents.

Civil rights organizations have echoed these concerns. In April, the Adalah organization, which advocates for the rights of Arab Israelis and Palestinians, urged the attorney general and state attorney to block the bill, warning that it could be used to target Arab citizens for political reasons.


France uses tough, untested cybercrime law to target Telegram’s Durov

Updated 17 September 2024
Follow

France uses tough, untested cybercrime law to target Telegram’s Durov

  • France uses new law to prosecute Telegram’s Pavel Durov
  • Durov denies Telegram is an ‘anarchic paradise’

PARIS: When French prosecutors took aim at Telegram boss Pavel Durov, they had a trump card to wield — a tough new law with no international equivalent that criminalizes tech titans whose platforms allow illegal products or activities.
The so-called LOPMI law, enacted in January 2023, has placed France at the forefront of a group of nations taking a sterner stance on crime-ridden websites. But the law is so recent that prosecutors have yet to secure a conviction.
With the law still untested in court, France’s pioneering push to prosecute figures like Durov could backfire if its judges balk at penalizing tech bosses for alleged criminality on their platforms.
A French judge placed Durov under formal investigation last month, charging him with various crimes, including the 2023 offense: “Complicity in the administration of an online platform to allow an illicit transaction, in an organized gang,” which carries a maximum 10-year sentence and a 500,000 euro ($556,300) fine.
Being under formal investigation does not imply guilt or necessarily lead to trial, but indicates judges think there’s enough evidence to proceed with the probe. Investigations can last years before being sent to trial or dropped.
Durov, out on bail, denies Telegram was an “anarchic paradise.” Telegram has said it “abides by EU laws,” and that it’s “absurd to claim that a platform or its owner are responsible for abuse of that platform.”
In a radio interview last week, Paris Prosecutor Laure Beccuau hailed the 2023 law as a powerful tool for battling organized crime groups who are increasingly operating online.
The law appears to be unique. Eight lawyers and academics told Reuters they were unaware of any other country with a similar statute.
“There is no crime in US law directly analogous to that and none that I’m aware of in the Western world,” said Adam Hickey, a former US deputy assistant attorney general who established the Justice Department’s (DOJ) national security cyber program.
Hickey, now at US law firm Mayer Brown, said US prosecutors could charge a tech boss as a “co-conspirator or an aider and abettor of the crimes committed by users” but only if there was evidence the “operator intends that its users engage in, and himself facilitates, criminal activities.”
He cited the 2015 conviction of Ross Ulbricht, whose Silk Road website hosted drug sales. US prosecutors argued Ulbricht “deliberately operated Silk Road as an online criminal marketplace ... outside the reach of law enforcement,” according to the DOJ. Ulbricht got a life sentence.
Timothy Howard, a former US federal prosecutor who put Ulbricht behind bars, was “skeptical” Durov could be convicted in the United States without proof he knew about the crimes on Telegram, and actively facilitated them — especially given Telegram’s vast, mainly law-abiding user base.
“Coming from my experience of the US legal system,” he said, the French law appears “an aggressive theory.”
Michel Séjean, a French professor of cyber law, said the toughened legislation in France came after authorities grew exasperated with companies like Telegram.
“It’s not a nuclear weapon,” he said. “It’s a weapon to prevent you from being impotent when faced with platforms that don’t cooperate.”

TOUGHER LAWS
The 2023 law traces its origins to a 2020 French interior ministry white paper, which called for major investment in technology to tackle growing cyber threats.
It was followed by a similar law in November 2023, which included a measure for the real-time geolocation of people suspected of serious crimes by remotely activating their devices. A proposal to turn on their devices’ cameras and mouthpieces so that investigators could watch or listen in was shot down by France’s Constitutional Council.
These new laws have given France some of the world’s toughest tools for tackling cybercrime, with the proof being the arrest of Durov on French soil, said Sadry Porlon, a French lawyer specialized in communication technology law.
Tom Holt, a cybercrime professor at Michigan State University, said LOPMI “is a potentially powerful and effective tool if used properly,” particularly in probes into child sexual abuse images, credit card trafficking and distributed denial of service attacks, which target businesses or governments.
Armed with fresh legislative powers, the ambitious J3 cybercrime unit at the Paris prosecutor’s office, which is overseeing the Durov probe, is now involved in some of France’s most high-profile cases.
In June, the J3 unit shut down Coco, an anonymized chat forum cited in over 23,000 legal proceedings since 2021 for crimes including prostitution, rape and homicide.
Coco played a central role in a current trial that has shocked France.
Dominique Pelicot, 71, is accused of recruiting dozens of men on Coco to rape his wife, whom he had knocked out with drugs. Pelicot on Tuesday testified in court, admitting to his guilt and asking his family for forgiveness. Meanwhile, 50 other men are also on trial for rape.
Coco’s owner, Isaac Steidel, is suspected of a similar crime as Durov: “Provision of an online platform to allow an illicit transaction by an organized gang.”
Steidel’s lawyer, Julien Zanatta, declined to comment.


Russian journalist jailed for anti-war statements starts hunger strike

Updated 17 September 2024
Follow

Russian journalist jailed for anti-war statements starts hunger strike

LONDON: Maria Ponomarenko, a journalist from Siberia serving a six-year prison sentence for speaking out against the war in Ukraine, has declared a hunger strike, according to her publication and a supporter.
The 46-year-old was detained less than two months after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 for accusing the Russian air force of bombing a theater in the Ukrainian city of Mariupol.
She was found guilty last February of spreading false information about the Russian military by a court in her hometown of Barnaul in western Siberia.
More than 20,000 people have been arrested across Russia for speaking out against the war, according to rights monitor OVD-Info. While most of those detained are fined and soon released, independent journalists often receive harsher treatment by courts.
Including Ponomarenko, a total of four journalists for RusNews, an online outlet which publishes only in Russian and has little audience abroad, are behind bars. The vast majority of independent media now operate from exile.
Ponomarenko now faces new criminal charges for allegedly attacking guards in the prison where she is incarcerated, according to RusNews.
Yulia Galyamina, a former Moscow city councillor, said Ponomarenko had been placed in an isolation cell after prison officials had falsified inspection reports against her, prompting her to declare a hunger strike at a court hearing on Monday.
“Masha is in a very bad condition,” Galyamina told Reuters, using an affectionate form of Ponomarenko’s first name and speaking by telephone from Barnaul, where she had traveled to attend the court hearings.
“She cried a lot (in court) due to a feeling of powerlessness. She wants to commit suicide even.”
RusNews said Ponomarenko had declared a hunger strike but declined to comment further to Reuters.
Ponomarenko said during a hearing last month she would cut her wrists in protest against the conditions at the pre-trial detention center, RusNews said.
Russia’s prison service did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Kommersant newspaper said last year that Ponomarenko had been diagnosed with “hysterical personality disorder” while in detention, and had slashed her wrists. It cited her lawyer as saying she suffered from claustrophobia and had broken a window.
Galyamina, who exchanges letters with Ponomarenko, was herself given a two-year suspended sentence four years ago for organizing anti-Kremlin protests. She was later declared a “foreign agent” and can no longer work in politics.


Kremlin says Meta is discrediting itself by banning Russian state media

Updated 17 September 2024
Follow

Kremlin says Meta is discrediting itself by banning Russian state media

  • The ban marks a sharp escalation in actions by the world’s biggest social media company against Russian state media

NEW YORK/MOSCOW: The Kremlin on Tuesday said Facebook owner Meta was discrediting itself by banning some Russian state media networks from its platforms and that Meta’s move complicated prospects for Moscow normalizing relations with the company.
Meta on Monday said it was banning RT and Rossiya Segodnya among other Russian state media, claiming the outlets had used deceptive tactics to carry out covert influence operations online.
“After careful consideration, we expanded our ongoing enforcement against Russian state media outlets. Rossiya Segodnya, RT and other related entities are now banned from our apps globally for foreign interference activity,” the social media company said in a written statement.
Enforcement of the ban would roll out over the coming days, it said. In addition to Facebook, Meta’s apps include Instagram, WhatsApp and Threads.
The Russian embassy did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
The ban marks a sharp escalation in actions by the world’s biggest social media company against Russian state media, after it spent years taking more limited steps like blocking the outlets from running ads and reducing the reach of their posts.
It came after the United States filed money-laundering charges earlier this month against two RT employees for what officials said was a scheme to hire an American company to produce online content to influence the 2024 election.
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Friday that countries should treat the activities of Russian state broadcaster RT as they do covert intelligence operations.
RT has mocked the US actions and accused the United States of trying to prevent the broadcaster from operating as a journalistic organization.
In briefing materials shared with Reuters, Meta said it had seen Russian state-controlled media try to evade detection in their online activities in the past and expected them to continue trying to engage in deceptive practices going forward.