Seven years of Rohingya exodus: Fears of lost generation, fading hope for return

Rohingya children refugees wait, squashed against each other, to receive food handouts distributed to children and women at a refugee camp in Bangladesh. (File/AP)
Short Url
Updated 25 August 2024
Follow

Seven years of Rohingya exodus: Fears of lost generation, fading hope for return

  • Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh have no working opportunities, diminishing hope for repatriation
  • There is a ‘big lack’ of collective international effort to solve Rohingya crisis, expert says

DHAKA: Seven years after a brutal military crackdown in Myanmar forced Hasina Begum and her family to flee across the border to Bangladesh, life has been nothing but a struggle.

The mother of four was one of more than 730,000 Rohingya who fled to Bangladesh in August 2017 to escape atrocities and persecution that according to the UN have amounted to genocide. Sunday, known as “Rohingya Genocide Day,” marked the anniversary of their mass exodus.

“There is no way out of the agony. Here, we have been living a life that is full of struggle, uncertainty, insecurity, and with no hope for the future,” Begum told Arab News.

Though the Rohingya have faced decades of systematic discrimination and persecution in the majority-Buddhist country, life in Bangladesh’s refugee camps was “not a dignified one,” she said.

The Rohingya, which the UN described as “one of the world’s most persecuted minorities,” were not recognized as an indigenous ethnic group in Myanmar, which denies them the right to claim citizenship.

Begum is now among the 1 million refugees living in the overcrowded camps in Cox’s Bazar, which has turned into the world’s largest refugee settlement and where humanitarian aid has dwindled.

“My children are suffering from malnutrition as I can’t provide them with sufficient food. The exorbitant price of daily essentials has put us in an extremely hard situation, and it’s getting tougher day by day,” she said.

International aid for the Rohingya has been dropping since 2020, with the World Food Program reducing food assistance for the refugees since last year after its pleas for donations were not met, deepening food insecurity in the camps.

Yet food was just one of Begum’s many worries, as Rohingya refugees struggle with no working opportunities, a lack of education and proper healthcare, and diminishing hope for a dignified repatriation.
Though the return of the Rohingya to Myanmar has been on the agenda for years, a UN-backed repatriation process has yet to take off despite pressure from Bangladesh and international organizations.

“We have witnessed many discussions in the UN and other regional platforms, but our fates remain the same,” Begum said.

“The superpowers should have done something effective to ensure our repatriation with dignity and rights. But it seems that the major players in the global platforms are driven by their own interests and agendas. Sometimes, it seems to me that we are just like dolls or tools at the whims of superpowers.”

Countries like the US often spoke about the protection of human rights, but Begum said such talks did not translate into real action for the Rohingya.

“In our case, we didn’t see much effort to protect our rights. It’s a shameful situation and seems like a double standard.”

In recent years, many Rohingya have made extremely dangerous voyages across the Indian Ocean to seek better lives, hoping to reach countries like Malaysia or Indonesia. However, the UN estimates that as many as one in eight people die or disappear in the attempt.

The international community “must do more” for his people, said Rohingya rights activist Mohammed Rezuwan Khan.

“The lack of international pressure and failure to take concrete action against the Myanmar junta and Arakan Army only adds to our sufferings and seems to be giving the perpetrators chances to continue their atrocities,” Khan, who along with his family survived the 2017 genocide, told Arab News.

Hundreds of Rohingya have reportedly been killed trying to flee ongoing fighting between Myanmar’s military government and the Arakan Army, an armed ethnic rebel group in Rakhine State, the center location of the 2017 violence.

“Repatriation seems distant, and I fear that even if it happens, the conditions in Myanmar will still not be safe or dignified for the Rohingya, as the Arakan Army and the military junta intensify their targets against the Rohingya,” Khan said.

On Friday, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk was among those who raised concerns over the deteriorating situation in Rakhine, which Amnesty International said was “disturbingly familiar” to the violence against the Rohingya seven years ago.

Yet since 2017, the world’s most powerful countries, like the US, China and Japan, have not put maximum pressure on Myanmar authorities, said Prof. Imtiaz Ahmed, international relations expert and a former lecturer at Dhaka University.

“Since all these countries are members of the UN, (the UN) could have initiated a strong united effort. But that’s not happening here,” Ahmed said.

“A collective effort from the international community is much needed. Just talking won’t do it anymore.”

The recent fighting in Rakhine has brought a new layer to the crisis, but also an opportunity for the international community to “take a chance” at this moment, Ahmed said.

“We have to keep in mind that every crisis creates some opportunities also. If we sit idle to let the crisis over, then there will not be any solution. There is no doubt that there is a big lack of collective effort at the international level.”

In Bangladesh, where hosting Rohingya refugees is costing the government about $1.2 billion per year, international support to ensure a dignified repatriation to Myanmar and a dignified life in waiting was deemed crucial.

“International community should engage more with Myanmar for repatriating the Rohingya, and until then, they should continue to provide support to Bangladesh,” said Mizanur Rahman, Bangladesh’s refugee relief and repatriation commissioner in Cox’s Bazar.

The Rohingya are “severely affected” by “the slow process of resolving the crisis,” which leaves them in “deep, frustrating situations,” he told Arab News.

“If they can’t return to their homeland … many Rohingya are now thinking that the future of their next generation is now at real stake.”


Heavy gunfire erupts in South Sudan’s capital Juba

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Heavy gunfire erupts in South Sudan’s capital Juba

The gunfire began around 7 p.m. local time and continued sporadically for more than an hour before dying down
Analysts said the sacking of Akol Koor reflected a power struggle at the highest levels of government

NAIROBI: Heavy gunfire erupted in South Sudan’s capital Juba on Thursday evening after security forces moved to arrest the former head of the intelligence service, according to Reuters reporters and an alert sent to United Nations staff.
The gunfire began around 7 p.m. local time (1700 GMT) and continued sporadically for more than an hour before dying down, Reuters reporters said.
A UN safety alert to staff members in Juba, seen by Reuters, said the shooting was related to the arrest of the former head of the National Security Service (NSS). It urged UN staff to shelter in place.
In early October, President Salva Kiir dismissed Akol Koor Kuc, who had led the NSS since the country’s independence from Sudan in 2011, and appointed a close ally to replace him.
Reached by telephone, a military spokesperson said he was trying to establish what was going on.
Analysts said the sacking of Akol Koor reflected a power struggle at the highest levels of government. It came weeks after the transitional government that Kiir leads announced that elections expected in December would be postponed for a second time.
Rival factions loyal to Kiir and First Vice President Riek Machar fought a civil war from 2013 to 2018 that resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths.
The two have governed together since then as part of a transitional government. There has been relative peace, but the opposing forces clash periodically in addition to frequent fighting among a patchwork of armed groups in rural areas.

Putin says hit Ukraine with new mid-range ballistic missile

Updated 35 min 24 sec ago
Follow

Putin says hit Ukraine with new mid-range ballistic missile

  • Putin said in a televised address that Russia carried out “testing in combat conditions of one of the newest Russian mid-range missile systems”
  • Russia struck the central Ukrainian city of Dnipro with a barrage of missiles early Thursday

MOSCOW: Russian President Vladimir Putin said Thursday that the country’s forces had hit Ukraine with a new mid-range ballistic missile.
Putin said in a televised address that Russia carried out “testing in combat conditions of one of the newest Russian mid-range missile systems... Our engineers named it Oreshnik,” which means hazel tree in Russian.
Russia struck the central Ukrainian city of Dnipro with a barrage of missiles early Thursday.
The Ukrainian air force and President Volodymyr Zelensky accused Russia of apparently using an intercontinental ballistic missile, while Ukrainian experts were still examining the evidence to ascertain the type of missile used.
Putin said in his address that Russia launched a combined strike on a defense industry target in Ukraine.
He described Oreshnik as a “ballistic missile” that was deployed in this case “in a non-nuclear hypersonic configuration,” saying that the “test” had been successful and had hit its target.
Air defenses cannot intercept the Oreshnik, which attacks at a speed of Mach 10, or 2.5-3 kilometers per second, Putin said.
“Modern air defense systems... cannot intercept such missiles. That’s impossible,” he said.
“As of today there are no means of counteracting such a weapon,” the president boasted.
He said Russia was testing the Oreshnik in combat conditions “in response to the aggressive actions of NATO countries toward Russia.”


UK urged to honor ICC’s arrest warrants against Israeli leaders

Updated 21 November 2024
Follow

UK urged to honor ICC’s arrest warrants against Israeli leaders

  • Warrants issued on Thursday against Israel’s ministers, officials of Hamas

LONDON: The British government has been urged by the Council for Arab-British Understanding to immediately honor International Criminal Court arrest warrants issued against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

The ICC issued the warrants on Thursday for Netanyahu, Gallant, and an official of Hamas, accusing them of war crimes and crimes against humanity over the war in Gaza and the attacks on Oct. 7, 2023, that triggered Israel’s offensive in the Palestinian territory.

CAABU director Chris Doyle emphasized the gravity of the situation, accusing the UK government of failing to hold Israel accountable for its actions in violation of international law.

Doyle said: “This decision highlights how woefully the UK government has handled the situation of Israeli atrocities and war crimes.

“It now must demonstrate, with concrete action, that this government will honor its pledge to uphold respect for international law and the ICC by abiding in full with the ICC decision.”

Doyle also called for immediate measures, including a full arms embargo on Israel, the cessation of military and security cooperation, and an end to arms sales while atrocities were allegedly being carried out in Gaza.

CAABU warned that failure to comply with the ICC’s warrants could severely damage the UK’s international standing, making it complicit in alleged crimes against humanity, including forced displacement, apartheid, and genocide.

“The UK’s reputation globally would be trashed,” Doyle cautioned.

The organization stressed that the ICC’s warrants represented a crucial step toward justice and accountability for Palestinians. However, Doyle stressed the need for swift action.

He said: “There is no time to wait; justice delayed is justice denied. The UK needs to uphold international law, accountability, and ensure justice with immediate effect by complying with these arrest warrants.”

The UK government has yet to issue a formal response to the ICC’s decision.


UK says it respects ICC independence as court issues arrest warrants

Updated 21 November 2024
Follow

UK says it respects ICC independence as court issues arrest warrants

  • PM Keir Starmer’s spokesperson said: “We remain focused on pushing for an immediate ceasefire to bring an end to the devastating violence in Gaza”

LONDON: Britain respects the independence of the International Criminal Court, Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s spokesperson said on Thursday, after it issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his ex-defense chief and a Hamas leader.
“We respect the independence of the International Criminal Court, which is the primary international institution for investigating and prosecuting the most serious crimes of international concern,” the spokesperson told reporters.
“There is no moral equivalence between Israel, a democracy, and Hamas and Lebanese Hezbollah, which are terrorist organizations. We remain focused on pushing for an immediate ceasefire to bring an end to the devastating violence in Gaza.”


Russia fires what appears to be intercontinental ballistic missile at Ukraine, Kyiv says

Updated 21 November 2024
Follow

Russia fires what appears to be intercontinental ballistic missile at Ukraine, Kyiv says

  • Western officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, later told Reuters their initial analysis showed it was not an intercontinental ballistic missile
  • Regardless of its classification, the latest strike highlighted rapidly rising tensions in the 33-month-old war

KYIV: Ukraine said Russia fired what appeared to be an intercontinental ballistic missile at the city of Dnipro on Thursday, in what would be the first use in war of a weapon designed to deliver long-distance nuclear strikes.
Western officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, later told Reuters their initial analysis showed it was not an intercontinental ballistic missile, though they left open the possibility that conclusion could change.
Regardless of its classification, the latest strike highlighted rapidly rising tensions in the 33-month-old war.
Ukraine fired US and British missiles at targets inside Russia this week despite warnings by Moscow that it would see such action as a major escalation.
Security experts said that if Thursday’s strike involved an intercontinental ballistic missile, it would be the first use of such a missile in war. ICBMs are strategic weapons designed to deliver nuclear warheads and are an important part of Russia’s nuclear deterrent.
“Today there was a new Russian missile. All the characteristics – speed, altitude – are (of an) intercontinental ballistic (missile). An expert (investigation) is currently underway,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a video statement.
Ukraine’s foreign ministry urged the international community to react swiftly to the use of what it said was “the use by Russia of a new type of weaponry.”
The Ukrainian air force said the missile was fired from the Russian region of Astrakhan, more than 700 km (435 miles) from Dnipro in central-eastern Ukraine. It did not specify what kind of warhead the missile had or what type of missile it was. There was no suggestion it was nuclear-armed.
Asked about the air force statement, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters to contact Russian military for comment.
Ukrainska Pravda, a Kyiv-based media outlet, cited anonymous sources saying the missile was an RS-26 Rubezh, a solid-fueled intercontinental ballistic missile with a range of 5,800 km, according to the Arms Control Association.
The RS-26 was first successfully tested in 2012, and is estimated to be 12 meters (40 ft) long and weigh 36 tons, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). It said the RS-26 can carry an 800-kg (1,765-pound)nuclear warhead.
The RS-26 is classified as an ICBM under a nuclear arms reduction treaty between the United States and Russia, but it can be seen as an intermediate-range ballistic missile when used with heavier payloads at ranges below 5,500 km, CSIS said.