Canada lists pro-Palestinian group Samidoun as a ‘terrorist’ entity

Canada, in coordination with the US, on Tuesday designated the pro-Palestinian group Samidoun as a "terrorist entity" alleging that it had links with another terrorist-designated group, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. (Reuters/File)
Short Url
Updated 15 October 2024
Follow

Canada lists pro-Palestinian group Samidoun as a ‘terrorist’ entity

  • “Canada will not tolerate this type of activity,” Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc said

OTTAWA: Canada, in coordination with the United States, on Tuesday designated the pro-Palestinian group Samidoun as a “terrorist entity” alleging that it had links with another terrorist-designated group, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.
“The listing of Samidoun as a terrorist entity under the Criminal Code sends a strong message that Canada will not tolerate this type of activity, and will do everything in its power to counter the ongoing threat to Canada’s national security and all people in Canada,” Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc said in a statement.


Macron says Israel PM ‘mustn’t forget his country created by UN decision’

Updated 6 min 39 sec ago
Follow

Macron says Israel PM ‘mustn’t forget his country created by UN decision’

  • “Mr Netanyahu must not forget that his country was created by a decision of the UN,” Macron told the weekly French cabinet meeting
  • “Therefore this is not the time to disregard the decisions of the UN“

PARIS: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should not forget his country was created as a result of a resolution adopted by the United Nations, French President Emmanuel Macron told cabinet on Tuesday, urging Israel to abide by UN decisions.
Tensions have increased between Netanyahu and Macron with the French leader last week insisting that stopping the export of weapons used by Israel in Gaza and Lebanon was the only way to stop the conflicts.
France has also repeatedly denounced Israeli fire against UN peacekeepers in southern Lebanon, who include a French contingent.
“Mr Netanyahu must not forget that his country was created by a decision of the UN,” Macron told the weekly French cabinet meeting, referring to the resolution adopted in November 1947 by the United Nations General Assembly on the plan to partition Palestine into a Jewish state and an Arab state.
“Therefore this is not the time to disregard the decisions of the UN,” he added, as Israel wages a ground offensive against the Iran-backed Shiite militant group Hezbollah in southern Lebanon, where the UN peacekeepers are deployed.
His comments from the closed door meeting at the Elysee Palace were quoted by a participant who spoke to AFP and asked not to be named.
UN Security Council Resolution 1701 states that only the Lebanese army and the UN peacekeeping mission UNIFIL should be deployed in southern Lebanon.
Netanyahu on Sunday called on the UN to move the 10,000 strong peacekeeping force, who include 700 French troops, deployed in south Lebanon out of “harm’s way,” saying Hezbollah was using them as “human shields.”


India-Canada relations reach historic lows as top diplomats expelled

Updated 35 min 34 sec ago
Follow

India-Canada relations reach historic lows as top diplomats expelled

  • Relations fraught since the murder of a Sikh separatist leader in British Columbia last year
  • Canadian PM says Indian officials identified as ‘persons of interest’ in the assassination plot

NEW DELHI: Relations between India and Canada have reached a historic low as the countries expelled each other’s diplomats in an ongoing row over the killing of a Sikh separatist activist on Canadian soil.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accused India’s government on Monday of “supporting criminal activity against Canadians here on Canadian soil,” and the country’s Foreign Ministry announced the expulsion of six Indian diplomats, including the high commissioner.

The ministry said Canadian police had gathered evidence, which identified them as “persons of interest” in last year’s killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, who was gunned down in Surrey, British Columbia.

India immediately rejected the accusations as absurd, and its Ministry of External Affairs said it was expelling Canada’s acting high commissioner, his deputy, and the embassy’s four first secretaries.

Before the announcement, it also summoned the Canadian charge d’affaires and said it was withdrawing its high commissioner and “other targeted diplomats,” contradicting Canada’s statement of expulsion.

“Prime Minister Trudeau has been making these public statements repeatedly, but the evidence that he claims to possess is not available to us so we cannot make any kind of a judgment,” Dr. Ajai Sahni, executive director of the Institute for Conflict Management in New Delhi, told Arab News.

“This is the first time the relationship is so low … It has created a lot of problems and it has done damage to relationships between the two countries for the time being.”

This is not the first time India-Canada relations have been strained. In 1974, after India conducted its first nuclear weapon test, it drew outrage from Canada, which accused it of extracting plutonium from a Canadian reactor, a gift intended for peaceful use.

Ottawa subsequently suspended its support for New Delhi’s nuclear energy program.

“The relationship was also low in the 1980s with the hijacking of an Indian Airlines plane and the bombing of the plane, in which many people died,” said Prof. Ronki Ram, political science lecturer at the Punjab University.

The explosion from a bomb planted by Canada-based militants killed 329 people — the worst terrorist attack in Canadian history. India had warned the Canadian government about the possibility of attacks and accused the Canadian Security Intelligence Service of not acting on it.

But the current strain in relations is the first in which diplomats have been withdrawn.

“This is the first time that the relationship has gone down so low,” Ram said.

“Allegations and counter-allegations will have serious implications both internationally and domestically. The Indian government should look into the allegations and try to address them.”

Nijjar, a Sikh Canadian citizen, was gunned down in June 2023 outside a Sikh temple in Surrey, which has a significant number of Sikh residents. He was an outspoken supporter of the Khalistan movement, which calls for a separate Sikh homeland in parts of India’s Punjab state.

The movement is outlawed in India, considered a national security threat by the government, and Nijjar’s name appears on the Indian Home Ministry’s list of terrorists.

Canada has the largest population of Sikhs outside their native state of Punjab — about 770,000 or 2 percent of its entire population.

“Many Panjabi diaspora are in Canada, and a mini-Punjab has been established there,” Ram said.

“The government is taking an electoral interest in the landscape of Canada also. Those things are becoming very critical.”


Russia releases man whose daughter’s drawing opposed Ukraine fighting

Updated 15 October 2024
Follow

Russia releases man whose daughter’s drawing opposed Ukraine fighting

  • Alexei Moskalyov was convicted in March 2023 on the basis of posts that he made on a social media site
  • The post came to authorities’ attention after his daughter, then age 13, made a drawing in school opposing the military operation

MOSCOW: A Russian man convicted of discrediting the military after his daughter made a drawing criticizing Russia’s military actions in Ukraine was released from prison after serving 22 months, a group that monitors political detentions said Tuesday.
Alexei Moskalyov was convicted in March 2023 on the basis of posts that he made on a social media site. The post came to authorities’ attention after his daughter, then age 13, made a drawing in school opposing the military operation.
Moskalyov was sentenced to two years in prison, but he fled. He was arrested in Belarus a day later and extradited to Russia. A court later reduced his sentence to a year and 10 months.
The OVD-Info group, which reported his release, said that Moskalyov told it that agents of the Federal Security Service questioned other inmates in his unit before he was released and suggested they were looking for cause to file new charges against him.
Since sending troops into Ukraine in February 2022, Russia has cracked down harshly on criticism of the military and the operation in Ukraine. Several prominent opponents of the fighting who were sentenced to lengthy prison terms — one of them to 25 years — were freed and sent out of the country in August in a widescale prisoner exchange with the West.


Indonesia displays ancient Bali artifacts looted by Dutch during colonial rule

Updated 15 October 2024
Follow

Indonesia displays ancient Bali artifacts looted by Dutch during colonial rule

  • In less than 2 years, the Netherlands has returned 760 stolen artifacts to Indonesia
  • ‘Repatriation’ exhibit is on display at the National Museum in Jakarta until Dec. 31

JAKARTA: Indonesia’s National Museum put on display on Tuesday hundreds of artifacts recently returned from the Netherlands, the bulk of which were looted by the Dutch during the bloody colonial conquest of Bali in the early 20th century.

Titled “Repatriation,” the exhibit features 300 items from a collection of over 1,700 stolen under colonial rule that the Netherlands has returned to Indonesia since 1978. It will run until Dec. 31.

Most of the artifacts on display comprise weapons, coins, jewelry, and textiles that the Netherlands had taken in the aftermath of wars in southern Bali between 1906 and 1908, when the Dutch military attacked the region’s kingdoms and killed at least 1,000 people.

It also includes large-scale Hindu-Buddhist sculptures, such as one of a likeness of the god Ganesha, which the Netherlands looted in the mid-19th century from a 13th-century Singhasari Kingdom’s temple complex in East Java.

“We hope that the public will learn that in the past, our country wasn’t an empty land that another nation chose to settle on. There were civilizations, kingdoms, and cultures, and all these artifacts are proof of those civilizations,” Bonnie Triyana, a historian and a member of the Indonesian Repatriation Committee, told Arab News.

“As such, people can learn from our history, the origins of our country, and how diverse we are, and how much we sacrificed to gain our independence.”

Indonesia declared independence in 1945, after a long colonial history under Dutch rule that began at the end of the 16th century.

Jakarta started to campaign for the Dutch government to return stolen Indonesian artifacts in 1951, but the Netherlands only started to return them in the 1970s in small numbers. The Indonesian Repatriation Committee has made big strides since last year with the repatriation of 472 artifacts, followed by 288 such items in September.

The repatriation process has been met with criticism, as some questioned how poorer countries like Indonesia will care for the returned artifacts. But Marieke van Bommel, director-general of the Netherlands’ National Museum of World Cultures, told the New York Times last month that “the thief cannot tell the rightful owners what to do with their property.”

For Triyana, who has served as secretary of the Indonesian Repatriation Committee since 2021, the National Museum exhibit is both a “gateway” and a “bridge” to connect Indonesians with their past.

“Colonialism came to our land and committed exploitation through conquest. Not only did they exploit our wealth and resources, but they also committed violence. It is a lesson for the current generation, both that colonialism was here and its character is still around,” he said.

“We must do decolonization to scrape off the remnants of colonialism, and one way to do this is by learning history … So, this exhibit is very important because repatriation isn’t solely about returning objects taken by our colonizers, but we also want to slowly collect pieces of knowledge about our civilization.”


UK planned to sanction ‘extremist’ Israeli ministers before election: Cameron

Updated 15 October 2024
Follow

UK planned to sanction ‘extremist’ Israeli ministers before election: Cameron

  • Ex-FM: Asset freezes, travel bans were prepared against Bezalel Smotrich, Itamar Ben-Gvir
  • Urges new Labour government to press ahead with plan but opposes arms export bans

LONDON: Former UK Foreign Secretary David Cameron has said he planned to sanction “extremist” Israeli ministers, including asset freezes and travel bans.

Cameron, who served as foreign secretary to former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak until July, told the BBC that he had been “working up” plans to sanction Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir when Sunak called a general election, which his Conservative Party lost.

Cameron urged the UK’s new Labour government to follow through with sanctions to tell Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that his government’s conduct “is not good enough and has to stop.”

Cameron told the BBC’s “Today” program that Ben-Gvir and Smotrich “said things like encouraging people to stop aid convoys going into Gaza — they have encouraged extreme settlers in the West Bank with the appalling things they’ve been carrying out.” 

Ben-Gvir had also claimed it was “justified and moral” to starve people in Gaza, and has called for the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from their land to “make the desert bloom,” Cameron said, adding that sanctioning them would let Netanyahu know that “when (you have) ministers in your government who are extremists and behave in this way, we are prepared to use our sanctions regime.”

Cameron said the plans to sanction the pair did not proceed as it would have been “too much of a political act” for a government entering an election.

Sources in Whitehall told the BBC that the plans were “well advanced” and “ready to go,” but there were suggestions that the move could have inflamed tensions in the UK and that the US opposed sanctioning Smotrich and Ben-Gvir.

David Lammy, the UK’s current foreign secretary, has since described the duo’s rhetoric as “entirely unacceptable,” adding: “We’re very worried about escalatory behavior, about inflamed tensions.”

On the subject of sanctions, he said: “I’m absolutely clear, if we have to act, we’ll act. I’m in discussions with G7 partners, particularly European partners, on that. I’m not announcing further sanctions today but that’s kept under close review.”

Since entering office, Lammy has ordered a review into UK arms sale licenses to Israel, which led to the suspension of 30 export licenses over concerns that the equipment would be used to break international law — a move Cameron opposed.

The government also ended its opposition to the issuing of arrest warrants for prominent Israeli politicians, including Netanyahu, by the International Criminal Court.

Cameron warned that arms export bans could hinder Israel’s ability to defend itself against Iran and Hezbollah.

“I thought the government made a mistake over the arms embargo because, fundamentally, if you’re … helping to protect Israel from a state-on-state attack by Iran, but at the same time you’re withholding the export of weapons, that policy makes no sense.”

He told the BBC: “There were other things we could do to put pressure on Netanyahu and say, ‘Of course we respect your right to self-defense but we do want you to act within the law.’”

Cameron added: “We all want this conflict to end, but it has to end in a way that’s sustainable so that it doesn’t restart. That’s why it’s right to back Israel’s right of self-defense.

“But it’s not a blank check, it’s not unconditional. We do want to see aid get through to Gaza, and we do want the role of the UN in Lebanon to be respected.”

Tom Keatinge, founding director of the Centre for Finance and Security at the Royal United Services Institute, told the BBC that sanctioning Smotrich and Ben-Gvir would send a “major political message” to the Israeli government.

Keatinge said there is no precedent for Britain sanctioning politicians of an allied nation, and it would lead to “practical issues” given that other UK allies are not in agreement on the stance.