Frankly Speaking: Does the Arab American vote matter?

Short Url
Updated 21 October 2024
Follow

Frankly Speaking: Does the Arab American vote matter?

DUBAI: As the US presidential election looms, a YouGov poll commissioned by Arab News has revealed a near-even split between former president Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris among Arab American voters. This result may surprise some, but according to a prominent Arab American analyst of Middle East affairs, it reflects the general sentiment among the US public, where key constituencies in swing states will determine the next occupant of the White House.

“Clearly, we see that the Arab American public generally reflects the same trend here as the American public because so many of these Arab Americans are not newly naturalized,” Firas Maksad, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Middle East Institute, said on the Arab News weekly current affairs show “Frankly Speaking.”

The YouGov survey results suggest that the Israeli war in Gaza and other events in the Middle East weigh strongly on the mind of the average Arab American voter. “But at the end of the day, it’s American Arab rather than Arab American,” Maksad said. “They have to vote based on bread-and-butter issues, the well-being of their families, the issues that impact them at home, rather than have an impact overseas. That’s not surprising.

“They are second, third, fourth-generation Arab Americans. Some of them came here in the mid-1800s. And so, they very much reflect the general sentiment in the American population.”

He added: “When asked point-blank about the significance of Gaza, most Arab Americans rank it as the top issue. However, that doesn’t seem to reflect in their overall choice. You would expect that not so many of them would be voting for President Trump, who was so clearly pro-Israel, who moved the American Embassy to Jerusalem and allowed Israel to annex the occupied Golan Heights,” Maksad said.

“There might be some tension between what Arab Americans say when asked what they think about Palestine, and the fact that they are also Americans who have their livelihood to worry about, the economy being chief among them, but also things like immigration. For so many women, also issues relating to their reproductive rights and abortion.”

Historically, the Arab vote has had little impact on the results of US elections. But is that still the case or has something changed? “That’s not the case,” Maksad said, “because of where they (Arab American voters) are, where that constituency is. States like Michigan that are going to be crucial, but even in Georgia, a significant population. Close to where I am in Washington, D.C. is Virginia, and there is a significant Arab population there in northern Virginia,” he said.

Indeed, elections that hinge on narrow margins make smaller constituencies like Arab Americans vital to either party’s success. Their impact in key states is magnified when considering the razor-thin victories in recent elections. The race in many states is so tight that “the margin is 0.5 percent one way or the other,” Maksad told Katie Jensen, host of “Frankly Speaking.”

He added: “So, that makes the Arab American vote a crucial one, a crucial constituency to win. We see that reflected in the positions of the various campaigns and the efforts to cater to, and to win over, that segment of the population.”




Firas Maksad unpacked the YouGov survey findings with ‘Frankly Speaking’ host Katie Jensen. (AN photo)

Maksad added that the “willingness and excitement” of Arab Americans to vote, “far exceeding” that of the general population, is a “sign of health that the Arab American community is engaged in the democratic process here in the US, particularly when there are concerns about discrimination and racism.”

Some 40 percent of Arab Americans who were surveyed by YouGov considered themselves Democrats while 28 percent were Republicans. Yet a slim majority was going to vote for Trump.

“The question has been out there as to whether some of this is a protest vote against the Biden-Harris ticket or team for their inability or lack of a political will to rein in Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,” Maksad said.

“But, again, what’s sort of puzzling about this is that if this is a protest vote, you wouldn’t necessarily vote for Trump because he is even more pro-Israeli for all the reasons that we’ve already discussed. You would go through a third party candidate like the Greens. So, I don’t know how much of that can be prescribed to what has unfolded in the Middle East.”

Maksad said that factors such as immigration and the economy need to be taken into account, too. “Immigration seemed to very interestingly rank very high on the minds of Arab Americans, which honestly, as an immigrant myself, I was not completely surprised by because those who immigrated here legally and went through the process, and paid the taxes, tend to feel pretty strongly about those who are cutting in line and not paying their fair share,” he said.

“So, illegal immigration here, which often plays in favor of Trump rather than Harris, could also be a factor.”

Looking ahead, Maksad said that a snapshot look at the latest US opinion polls suggested that the Trump campaign is gaining momentum. So, what would a Trump win mean for the Middle East?

“The sense, whether rightfully or wrongfully, is that President Trump is a much more forceful figure, particularly when it comes to the Middle East. Everybody here recalls the Abraham Accords (between Israel and several Arab countries), which many did not think were possible,” he said.

“There’s that sense then, this promise that President Trump has kept repeating that he will end those wars, whether it’s the war in Ukraine or the war in Gaza. We will have to see whether he will make good on that promise.

“Whether he will be able to bring Netanyahu to heel on issues that the US wants to … is an open question.”


Peru’s ex-president Toledo gets more than 20 years in prison in case linked to corruption scandal

Updated 2 sec ago
Follow

Peru’s ex-president Toledo gets more than 20 years in prison in case linked to corruption scandal

LIMA, Peru: Peru’s former President Alejandro Toledo on Monday was sentenced to 20 years and six months in prison in a case involving Brazilian construction giant Odebrecht, which became synonymous with corruption across Latin America, where it paid millions of dollars in bribes to government officials and others.
Authorities accused Toledo of accepting $35 million in bribes from Odebrecht in exchange for allowing a highway to be built in the South American country. The National Superior Court of Specialized Criminal Justice in the capital, Lima, imposed the sentence after years of legal wrangling, including a dispute over whether Toledo, who governed Peru from 2001 to 2006, could be extradited from the United States.
Odebrecht, which built some of Latin America’s most crucial infrastructure projects, admitted to US authorities in 2016 to having bought government contracts throughout the region with generous bribes. The investigation by the US Department of Justice spun probes in several countries, including Mexico, Guatemala and Ecuador.
In Peru, authorities accused Toledo and three other former presidents of receiving payments from the construction giant. Toledo has denied the accusations against him.
He will serve his sentence at a prison on the outskirts of Lima. The facility was specifically built to house former Peruvian presidents.
Toledo, 78, was first arrested in 2019 at his home in California, where he had been living since 2016, when he returned to Stanford University, his alma mater, as a visiting scholar to study education in Latin America. He was initially held in solitary confinement at a county jail east of San Francisco but was released to house arrest in 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic and his deteriorating mental health.
He was extradited to Peru in 2022 after a court of appeals denied a challenge to his extradition and he surrendered to authorities. He has since remained under preventive detention.

Harris woos on-the-fence Republicans, Trump tours storm damage

Updated 22 October 2024
Follow

Harris woos on-the-fence Republicans, Trump tours storm damage

US Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris made a push to woo moderates in her rival’s camp in three swing states Monday, while Donald Trump slammed the government’s response to Hurricane Helene as he toured the devastated state of North Carolina.

With just over two weeks until Election Day, the Democratic vice president and her Republican opponent are on a blitz through the battlegrounds that will decide the outcome in a race that polls say is too close to call.

On Monday, Harris appeared in Pennsylvania alongside Liz Cheney — a prominent Republican — who called on undecided voters “to reject the kind of vile vitriol that we’ve seen from Donald Trump.”

Trump toured storm-damaged Asheville and repeated conspiracy theories about the government’s disaster response. Later, at a rally in Greenville, he hammered home his campaign message that immigrants were “looting, ransacking, raping and pillaging” the country.

On Monday alone, Harris had events scheduled in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin — Rust Belt states that were in Trump’s column in 2016 but crucial to President Joe Biden’s victory four years later.

Cheney and her former vice president father Dick were once considered fixtures in the Republican firmament but have been ostracized since it was taken over by Trump.

Harris said Trump’s dominance in politics since his shock 2016 election had led Americans to “point the finger at one another” and left the country “exhausted.”

Cheney, who endorsed Harris last month, echoed that view.

“We’re going to reject cruelty,” she said. “We have the chance in this race to elect somebody who you know is going to defend the rule of law.”

Speaking in Michigan, Harris called for voters to put partisan politics aside when they cast their ballot.

“Regardless of who they voted for in the last election and the party with which they’re registered to vote, on some issues we just have to all be Americans,” she said.

Both candidates have courted voters from blocs that have historically sided with their rivals, a sign of how close the contest is.

On Monday, Trump appealed to Arab Americans in a social media post, calling Harris a “war hawk” over the White House’s handling of Israel’s war with Hamas and Hezbollah.

Trump has been criticized for a tumultuous few weeks that have featured rambling monologues and threats about weaponizing the military against Democrats who he calls “the enemy from within.”

In Greenville, he painted a picture of a United States that was “crippled and destroyed” by immigration, crime and inflation.

Earlier, in Asheville, the 78-year-old doubled down on conspiracy theories, accusing the administration and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of redirecting disaster funds to bring in undocumented immigrants and bolster Democratic votes.

Officials in the state were forced to issue hurricane response fact-checks after Trump and his backers pushed what Biden called “an onslaught of lies” about confiscated property, neglected Republican areas and funds diverted to migrants.

Trump notched his narrowest victory in North Carolina when he lost to Biden in 2020.

Both Harris and Trump are fighting to lock down a few thousand wavering voters in key districts as they bid to edge ahead in the race.

Harris’s campaign brought in and spent more than $200 million in September — more than three times as much as Trump, who is out on bail in two criminal cases and awaiting sentencing in a third over allegations of 2020 election-related misconduct.

Despite the vice president’s campaign spending, opinion polls suggest the race has been tied since late August.

As the pair make their closing arguments, a new Washington Post-Schar School poll of registered voters in seven battleground states found support even at 47 percent for each candidate. Harris had a one-point lead among likely voters.

Pro-Trump tech mogul Elon Musk has weighed heavily on the election, pouring $75 million into his political committee, turning his social media company X into a bullhorn for the Republican side and stumping for Trump in Pennsylvania.

But the state’s Democratic governor, Josh Shapiro, suggested authorities could investigate Musk’s promise at a weekend rally to award a $1 million prize daily until Election Day to a person who has signed an online petition “supporting the US Constitution.”


N.Korea sending troops to Ukraine would be ‘dangerous’ development: US

Updated 22 October 2024
Follow

N.Korea sending troops to Ukraine would be ‘dangerous’ development: US

UNITED NATIONS: The United States on Monday said it would be a dangerous development for North Korea to send troops to support Russia in Ukraine, as Seoul has asserted.
“We have seen reports the DPRK has sent forces and is preparing to send additional soldiers to Ukraine to fight alongside Russia,” Robert Wood, US ambassador to the United Nations, told the Security Council.
“If true, this marks a dangerous and highly concerning development and an obvious deepening of the DPRK-Russia military relationship,” Wood said, using the acronym for the North’s official name.
“We are consulting with our allies and partners on the implications of such a dramatic move,” he added.
Seoul’s spy agency said on Friday that North Korea had decided to send a “large-scale” troop deployment to support Moscow’s war in Ukraine, with 1,500 special forces already in Russia’s Far East and undergoing training.
The agency estimated the North could send around 12,000 soldiers in total.
The US State Department is “not yet at a point where we’re able to confirm those reports and whether they are accurate,” deputy spokesman Vedant Patel said Monday.
France’s UN envoy Nicolas de Riviere told the UN Security Council that the deployment of North Korean soldiers would constitute a further escalation.
He added that Pyongyang’s “increasing support for the Russian war effort is very worrying.”
The United States and its allies have already voiced concern about North Korea providing weapons to Russia, which invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
 


King Charles to meet Indigenous Australians in civil rights birthplace Redfern

Updated 22 October 2024
Follow

King Charles to meet Indigenous Australians in civil rights birthplace Redfern

SYDNEY: Britain’s King Charles travels on Tuesday to Redfern, birthplace of Australia’s urban Aboriginal civil rights movement in inner Sydney, a day after being heckled by an Indigenous senator at Parliament House.
Charles, on his first major foreign trip since being diagnosed with cancer, had finished speaking when the independent senator and activist Lidia Thorpe shouted that she did not accept his sovereignty over Australia, and demanded a treaty for Indigenous people.
A national referendum on whether to alter Australia’s constitution to recognize Aboriginal people was rejected last year, a sore point for many Indigenous Australians. Charles referred to Australia’s “long and sometimes difficult journey toward reconciliation” in his speech.
He will meet with Indigenous Elders in the inner city suburb of Redfern, where the Aboriginal civil rights movement was founded in the 1970s, on Tuesday.
At the National Center for Indigenous Excellence, Charles will speak with Indigenous organizations and Redfern Elders including “bush tucker” — or native food — chef Aunty Beryl Van-Oploo.
He will also visit an inner city social housing project with sustainable features, designed with the support of his King’s Trust Australia charity. Charles will tour the Glebe construction site with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who grew up on a public housing estate.
Julie Bishop, chair of the King’s Trust Australia, said the charity “closely follows His Majesty’s passions – helping young people into work, coaching veterans and defense families in entrepreneurship, and working on sustainable community projects.”
Charles and Queen Camilla are visiting Sydney and Canberra over six days before traveling to the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Samoa.
The public will have an opportunity to meet the royal couple at the Opera House later on Tuesday. 


Ukraine foreign minister calls for support to stop Russian strikes on its Black Sea ports

Updated 22 October 2024
Follow

Ukraine foreign minister calls for support to stop Russian strikes on its Black Sea ports

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha said on Monday he and Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan had discussed safe navigation for shipping in the Black Sea.
“I conveyed Ukraine’s interest in further developing cooperation between Ukraine and Türkiye, especially in defense area,” Sybiha wrote on the social platform X.
“I also underscored the importance of ensuring freedom of navigation in the Black Sea. We also discussed ways to a comprehensive, just, and lasting peace.”
Sybiha had earlier called for support to stop intensified Russian strikes on Ukrainian Black Sea port infrastructure, in comments made while on a visit to Turkiye on Monday.
He said such strikes in recent weeks had damaged four civilian vessels.
Turkiye has offered to act as an intermediary to end the more than 2-1/2-year old war sparked by the Kremlin’s invasion of Ukraine and has endeavoured to maintain good ties with both Moscow and Kyiv.
“We see benefit in once again discussing initiatives that could serve peace, like the Black Sea grain initiative,” Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said, referring to the deal Turkiye helped broker to allow Black Sea exports from Ukraine’s ports.
“I discussed this with my counterpart as well, we admire Ukraine’s positive stance on this.”
The Black Sea grain initiative remained in force for about a year until Russia backed out of the accord in July 2023, saying provisions of the agreement were not being fulfilled.