BAGHDAD, 5 September 2005 — Ousted Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein will go on trial on a charge of mass killings on Oct. 19, Iraq’s government spokesman confirmed yesterday, raising the possibility that he could soon be hanged.
“There is a date set for Oct. 19,” Laith Kubba told a news conference, adding that several of Saddam’s associates, including one of his half-brothers, would face trial with him. “They will be tried for the execution of 143 citizens.”
Kubba was referring to reprisals for an assassination attempt on Saddam in the Shiite village of Dujail in 1982, after which over 140 men from the village were killed.
Iraq’s Shiite-led government has reintroduced the death penalty after it was suspended following the US invasion in March 2003. On Thursday, three convicted criminals were hanged, the first since the suspension was lifted.
Saddam faces execution if found guilty.
Stressing that he was voicing a personal opinion, Kubba said that if Saddam were convicted for the Dujail killings, trials for other crimes might be shelved and the sentence carried out quickly. He gave no estimate of the length of the trial.
The trial will follow swiftly after a referendum on a new constitution for the post-Saddam era, due by Oct. 15. The draft text is already highly divisive between Iraq’s three main communities, Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds. Saddam is a Sunni, the once politically dominant group which makes up around 20 percent of Iraq’s population.
On Saturday, Saddam’s family selected a new international legal counsel to defend him, saying they would not reveal the counsel’s identity for the time being.
Also on Saturday, his chief attorney Khalil Dulaimi dismissed the date of Oct. 19 as “invalid,” saying he needed years to study the 36 tons of files of evidence against Saddam.
Tens of thousands of Iraqis are thought to have been killed, tortured or executed, under Saddam’s rule, including in a gas attack on the Kurdish village of Halabja in 1988 which killed around 7,000. Saddam said the attack was aimed at Iranian troops.
But by focusing on the relatively limited 1982 Dujail case, prosecutors have said they believe they can show Saddam’s personal responsibility more easily than in the bigger crimes.
