A different kind of woman: Ahd Kamel

Updated 23 June 2013
Follow

A different kind of woman: Ahd Kamel

She prefers to be known only by her first name. She believes in the universal power of attraction. She reads Osho. She also thinks that dance and music can be spiritual experiences. She’s rebellion and tenderness; lady-like, yet tomboyish; soft, and loud—a juxtaposition of contradictions.

She also thinks it isn’t so outlandish that our meeting is the result of my wishful thinking. I decided to like her already. There’s a side to her that understands strangeness.

The first Saudi female to have graduated in filmmaking under the tutelage of William Esper, she has no illusions of self. Early this year, she premiered ‘Sanctity,’ a self-directorial short film on the struggles of a young pregnant widow in the fist of an unforgiving society, at the Doha Film Festival and Berlin International Film Festival.

Needless to say, I was blown away by her spunk as much as I was by her easy charm. Here’s trying to get inside the head of Ahd Kamel during long hours spent chatting, intensely.

Why cinema?

It wasn’t something I dreamt about as a kid, but I always performed at home and imitated everything. I was doing it always whether my family liked it or not.

The acting bug caught on quite early then?

In school I used to act in plays but I never thought that I’d end up doing this. I went to New York to study law. Looking back, I think I fell in love with law because of the scenes in courtrooms that I used to see in movies. I think it was more about performance than it was actually about law.

Your parents must have been pretty open-minded?

I grew up very sheltered and conservative. This whole thing never even crossed my mind but I always had an artistic side to me.

What happened with studying law? 

After one semester in Columbia I hated it. I decided to reapply at Parsons to study animation. By the fourth year of animation, I realized that I did not want to do it. I loved the creative side of it, but it was too solitary for me.

You like to work with people?

I realized I was too ADD (Attention Deficit Disorder) to sit in one place.

Have you been diagnosed with Attention Deficit Disorder? 

Yeah, nooo…but I always jump from one thing to the next.

Did your jump from law to animation make for a confused state of mind?

Animation was too tedious and drove me crazy. I just didn’t have the love for it. So for my thesis, out of laziness, I decided to do a documentary with 5-minute intervals of animation just so I didn’t have to animate characters and stuff. And that’s how I fell in love with the camera.

And then you went back to school to study acting?

I finished studying animation, but I wasn’t ready to come back. That’s when I decided to enroll in a film school and I absolutely fell in love. I realized that the first day we were on set I was there for 14 hours, and I had lost complete track of time. I was doing what I just loved doing. I tell people that cinema chose me, I didn’t choose cinema. I just stumbled on it.

How much of an influence did your family have on the person you were trying to be?

My dad was a very creative person. He was a doctor and then switched to banking. He was also a poet who was very interested in writing and the arts, and he loved music. He was a huge influence on me.

I’ve heard that you’re quite into music yourself? 

Yes. It is everything to me. Sometimes, I fall into very dark music and sometimes I love house music, other times I’m on a pop binge. It really depends on my mood.

Can I hear what’s on your playlist?

Oh they always vary. But someone who has always stuck around is Sade and the Dave Matthews Band.

Oh, you’re so old school!

I am old school! I’m 32, so I’m definitely old school at this point. I’ve accepted this realization. Eighties music was definitely a huge part of my upbringing. I remember my brother and I would go to Khalediyah (a district in Jeddah) to buy these mix-tapes and try to figure them out because they never labeled them correctly. And whenever we traveled, a huge part of our trip was to go to record shops and buy our music.

You were an assistant to Peter Berg on the movie The Kingdom. I’ve always wondered whether it was shot in Dubai…

Oh no, in Arizona. And a few shots in Abu Dhabi actually. It was absolutely magical.

How did you manage to get on board with him? 

I met Peter through a friend. He was doing the movie, and I said ‘I want to work with you,’ and he said, ‘Okay. Come on board as my set assistant.’ And I had no idea what to do because I hadn’t worked on that scale and…

So it fell into your lap just like that? Like those true moments in destiny…

Yeah, exactly! I really don’t know what pushed me to ask him. I had zero expertise. And then he called me up and said ‘I want you with us.’ So I went and had no idea what to expect.

How did it turn out?

It was a really, really great experience on many levels. It was this huge company on wheels. Everything was running as smoothly as it could. Just seeing how the departments were communicating with each other and watching him with the actors and other members was a true Hollywood experience. And being his assistant, I had the “in” on a lot of things, which was a great opportunity for me.

But you didn’t continue in the Hollywood frame… Why?

I didn’t want to move to L.A. I wasn’t interested in Hollywood. It was too big and grand for me. I preferred the independent scene in New York. I knew my direction was not Hollywood.

How did you settle back in after having experienced the ‘Hollywood dream’?

I went back to New York and started working on tiny, small-budget films. I worked as an actor in a friends’ film during film school and it did well in the film festival circuits. You know, coming from Saudi, I didn’t even know whether I should dip my feet in the water and try…

Did your family oppose to you becoming an actress?

I was living in New York. I was far away, and at that point I was married to an American guy. We got divorced though after a three-year marriage. By Saudi rules I was covered because my husband was okay with it. So that’s what pushed me in that direction. Also, when I started acting school I deeply fell in love with acting because it appealed to different sides of me.

What do you feel most at home with, artistically? Because you direct, you act and you also write your stories…

I think all three. Whether I act or direct or write, it’s like a spell. Acting is more visible, because you really truly lose yourself. And you do that in writing as well.

Writing and acting can be such solitary experiences, but filmmaking brings a collective dynamic into the equation, no? How do you prepare mentally to juggle between these extremely disparate modes of creative expressions?

I like to be very prepared when I’m directing, but I also allow spontaneity, which is what happens in my films. We adjust as we go along. That’s why it’s a creative process. It’s never-ending. It’s never closed or done. There’s always room for things, and as a director you have to be open to that, otherwise you might miss out on opportunities. That’s why it’s great to work with a group of people because there’s a dynamic and every person on the set brings something to your shoot.

Your short film Sanctity, deals with the theme of widowhood. How did the idea originate with you first? Was it inspired by a story you had heard or read…?

Widowhood was more about the question of not having a man in your life. My parents are deceased, and I am so lucky to have four brothers. But you reach a stage where it’s debilitating, where you need this man in your life to get things done. So it was about that. You know what I mean…

How much of you is in the main character?

The character was tormented, losing her husband and being pregnant with her first child. Just creating those circumstances, I could relate to some of them.

I have great brothers who respect me and respect my choices, but what if someone didn’t. The story started with the question that what if a woman didn’t have a man, what would she do? And how do you illustrate women’s strength, which is endurance? A lot of people mistake that as a weakness, but no, that’s part of our strength as women and that’s something that we should look at and appreciate. Men in this society should understand that. People understand strength only as power and male strength. So how do these oppressed women fight back?

The portrayal of immense strength from the central character Areej, a widowed pregnant woman in Saudi Arabia, seemed a little strange to me, considering her circumstances.

And that’s exactly what I wanted to show. That’s the female strength that I’m talking about. She’s carrying a baby. She has no time to mourn and to feel bad for herself. She has to think ahead of that. She has a child to protect, so what is she willing to endure, you know. And I think that’s part of why she’s detached. She was willing to go and break all these taboos. The woman opens a window into her most vulnerable state and mans up.

I must admit I was a little upset that there was no clarity in the closing scene… Am I justified to feel that way?

Yeah, but see… I like to leave room for the audience to imagine and take the film with them. The films that have touched me have always never had a true ending. Because I feel that with creative work, you can’t wrap it up. That’s not life.

Or you didn’t want to deal with the onus of having to create a clear-cut finale?

No… No. It was very intentional. I wanted the audience to walk away with that ending in their head and with the question in my head.

What was the question in your head?

What would a woman like her do? And how are we dealing with such things? Are we dealing with them objectively in our society, or as if we are in a utopia that doesn’t exist? It’s more about turning the mirror inwards. At the end of the day, the film was a reaction to what was happening inside of me. To questions, conflicts, and struggles like these nobody has an answer. I never look at a film as a message or a case. It’s always a question and I like to live that question.

In your films you've managed to break out of discussing stereotypical themes like hijab, or say, women driving – stories that may usually be expected to originate from Saudi Arabia.

See… That for me is like an agenda. It’s public service announcements or propaganda. I’m an artist. It’s really about what’s happening inside of me and what moves me emotionally and how the story reaches me. Again, I don’t want to be politicized. ‘Sanctity’ came from a lot of personal experiences, of being a Saudi woman and living in the west for so long, and having to break their stereotypical image of women in Saudi. And then coming here and listening to all the crazy stories about what’s happening to women. When you put your work out, it’s out of your hands, you can’t control it anymore, and people can judge it left, right and center. For me, a mere judgment isn’t based on showing hair in my film for which people would completely shun the film, or create problems and miss the whole point.”

But don’t you expect misinterpretation, or perhaps some measure of offense for shooting scenes that show a bit of skin and hair at some level? At least in terms of Saudi sensibilities…

Yeah, that’s why my films don’t screen in Saudi.

That doesn’t upset you?

I’m okay with it, for now. Not everyone will like my films. I’m pretty sure about that.

Well you can’t keep everybody happy.

And I don’t want to. If I put up my films on YouTube and let everyone watch them. When someone puts a fatwa on my head, some crazy dude shows up at my door, and shoots me: it’s done. At the end of the day, whatever issues my films are bringing inside of them is their problem. It has nothing to do with me. It’s really about me, and my freedom of expression. 

People in Saudi Arabia don’t simply take offense and go home, sleep on it and wake up the next morning. Some people make it their life mission to go out and kill you, which is absolutely insane.

Tell me about your experience on the sets of ‘Wadjda,’ under the directorial expertise of Haifa Al-Mansour.

It was great. I was initially to play the role of the mother. The teacher was so standoffish you know. But I’m so glad she (Haifa) pushed me to do this role. Also, it was a great opportunity for me because for the first time I wasn’t playing an oppressed Arab woman trying to piece her life together. I was playing evil and that had to be born somewhere. And how that character redeems herself was actually fun. That really allowed me to go back to that different side of me.

As an active Saudi woman, your profile boasts a couple of firsts. Do you feel some kind of responsibility to project a certain image of the Saudi woman?

Absolutely not. I am an artist before being Saudi. That is important for me, and for people to understand. I don’t want to carry the Saudi flag by any means because once you do that, you are politicized and you become a role model. And that’s exactly what I don’t want to be. As an artist I want room for myself to do whatever I need to do and to be able to explore whatever appeals to me. I’m too selfish honestly to want to project any of that.

But it isn’t that easy to escape the profiling, I presume. 

I’m not speaking for Saudi women. My experience is different from other Saudi women. I think the most important thing we need to understand right now is the freedom of choice and that’s what we’re lacking here, for women and for men. And that’s what we should be advocating more than anything else. If I choose not to have a guardian at a certain age, then I’m supposed to have that right. At the end of the day, women are the people bringing up the kids and the new generation. So if we’re capable of bringing up kids, then we’re capable of the responsibility for ourselves. We need to look into things again and understand why we are doing certain things. Times are changing, and how do we adapt to changing times? We need to be objective and use our religion. We’ve forgotten the sanctity of life, and really are focused on superficial issues. What was it that I read the other day…? ‘Women are like chocolates. If they’re uncovered, then insects and flies will…’ What? So we’re objects now? Stop objectifying things. We’re part of society and we’re capable.

 


Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs denied bail a third time as he awaits sex trafficking trial

Updated 28 November 2024
Follow

Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs denied bail a third time as he awaits sex trafficking trial

  • Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to charges that he coerced and abused women for years, aided by associates and employees

NEW YORK: Sean “Diddy” Combs was denied bail on Wednesday as he awaits a May sex trafficking trial by a judge who cited evidence showing him to be a serious risk of witness tampering and proof that he has violated regulations in jail.
US District Judge Arun Subramanian made the decision in a written ruling following a bail hearing last week, when lawyers for the hip-hop mogul argued that a $50 million bail package they proposed would be sufficient to ensure Combs doesn’t flee and doesn’t try to intimidate prospective trial witnesses.
Two other judges previously had been persuaded by prosecutors’ arguments that the Bad Boy Records founder was a danger to the community if he is not behind bars.
Lawyers did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment on the decision.
Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to charges that he coerced and abused women for years, aided by associates and employees. An indictment alleges that he silenced victims through blackmail and violence, including kidnapping, arson and physical beatings.
A federal appeals court judge last month denied Combs’ immediate release while a three-judge panel of the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan considers his bail request.
Prosecutors have insisted that no bail conditions would be sufficient to protect the public and prevent the “I’ll Be Missing You” singer from fleeing.
They say that even in a federal lockup in Brooklyn, Combs has orchestrated social media campaigns designed to influence prospective jurors and tried to publicly leak materials he thinks can help his case. They say he also has contacted potential witnesses through third parties.
Lawyers for Combs say any alleged sexual abuse described in the indictment occurred during consensual relations between adults and that new evidence refutes allegations that Combs used his “power and prestige” to induce female victims into drugged-up, elaborately produced sexual performances with male sex workers known as “Freak Offs.”


New Zealanders save more than 30 stranded whales

Updated 25 November 2024
Follow

New Zealanders save more than 30 stranded whales

  • New Zealand is a whale stranding hotspot and pilot whales are especially prolific stranders
  • New Zealand has recorded more than 5,000 whale strandings since 1840

WELLINGTON: More than 30 pilot whales that stranded themselves on a beach in New Zealand were safely returned to the ocean after conservation workers and residents helped to refloat them by lifting them on sheets. Four of the pilot whales died, New Zealand’s conservation agency said.
New Zealand is a whale stranding hotspot and pilot whales are especially prolific stranders.
A team was monitoring Ruakaka Beach near the city of Whangarei in New Zealand’s north on Monday to ensure there were no signs of the whales saved Sunday stranding again, the Department of Conservation said. The agency praised as “incredible” the efforts made by hundreds of people to help save the foundering pod.
“It’s amazing to witness the genuine care and compassion people have shown toward these magnificent animals,” Joel Lauterbach, a Department of Conservation spokesperson, said in a statement. “This response demonstrates the deep connection we all share with our marine environment.”
A Maori cultural ceremony for the three adult whales and one calf that died in the stranding took place on Monday. New Zealand’s Indigenous people consider whales a taonga – a sacred treasure – of cultural significance.
New Zealand has recorded more than 5,000 whale strandings since 1840. The largest pilot whale stranding was of an estimated 1,000 whales at the Chatham Islands in 1918, according to the Department of Conservation.
It’s often not clear why strandings happen but the island nation’s geography is believed to be a factor. Both the North and South Islands feature stretches of protruding coastline with shallow, sloping beaches that can confuse species such as pilot whales – which rely on echolocation to navigate.


Cheating on your spouse is no longer a crime in New York, with the repeal of a little-known 1907 law

Updated 23 November 2024
Follow

Cheating on your spouse is no longer a crime in New York, with the repeal of a little-known 1907 law

ALBANY, N.Y.: New York on Friday repealed a seldom-used, more than century-old law that made it a crime to cheat on your spouse — a misdemeanor that once could have landed adulterers in jail for three months.
Gov. Kathy Hochul signed a bill repealing the statute, which dates back to 1907 and has long been considered antiquated as well as difficult to enforce.
“While I’ve been fortunate to share a loving married life with my husband for 40 years — making it somewhat ironic for me to sign a bill decriminalizing adultery — I know that people often have complex relationships,” she said. “These matters should clearly be handled by these individuals and not our criminal justice system. Let’s take this silly, outdated statute off the books, once and for all.”
Adultery bans are actually law in several states and were enacted to make it harder to get a divorce at a time when proving a spouse cheated was the only way to get a legal separation. Charges have been rare and convictions even rarer. Some states have also moved to repeal their adultery laws in recent years.
New York defined adultery as when a person “engages in sexual intercourse with another person at a time when he has a living spouse, or the other person has a living spouse.” The state’s law was first used a few weeks after it went into effect, according to a New York Times article, to arrest a married man and 25-year-old woman.
State Assemblymember Charles Lavine, sponsor of the bill, said about a dozen people have been charged under the law since the 1970s, and just five of those cases resulted in convictions.
“Laws are meant to protect our community and to serve as a deterrent to anti-social behavior. New York’s adultery law advanced neither purpose,” Lavine said in a statement Friday.
The state’s law appears to have last been used in 2010, against a woman who was caught engaging in a sex act in a park, but the adultery charge was later dropped as part of a plea deal.
New York came close to repealing the law in the 1960s after a state commission tasked with evaluating the penal code said it was nearly impossible to enforce.
At the time, lawmakers were initially on board with removing the ban but eventually decided to keep it after a politician argued that repealing it would make it seem like the state was officially endorsing infidelity, according to a New York Times article from 1965.


Banana taped to a wall sells for $6.2 million in New York

Updated 21 November 2024
Follow

Banana taped to a wall sells for $6.2 million in New York

  • Chinese-born crypto founder Justin Sun forks over more than six million for the fruit and its single strip of silver duct tape
  • Given the shelf life of a banana, Sun is essentially buying a certificate of authenticity that the work was created by Maurizio Cattelan

NEW YORK: A fresh banana taped to a wall — a provocative work of conceptual art by Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan — was bought for $6.2 million on Wednesday by a cryptocurrency entrepreneur at a New York auction, Sotheby’s announced in a statement.
The debut of the edible creation entitled “Comedian” at the Art Basel show in Miami Beach in 2019 sparked controversy and raised questions about whether it should be considered art — Cattelan’s stated aim.
Chinese-born crypto founder Justin Sun on Wednesday forked over more than six million for the fruit and its single strip of silver duct tape, which went on sale for 120,000 dollars five years ago.
“This is not just an artwork. It represents a cultural phenomenon that bridges the worlds of art, memes, and the cryptocurrency community,” Sun was quoted as saying in the Sotheby’s statement.
“I believe this piece will inspire more thought and discussion in the future and will become a part of history.”
The sale featured seven potential buyers and smashed expectations, with the auction house issuing a guide price of $1-1.5 million before the bidding.
Given the shelf life of a banana, Sun is essentially buying a certificate of authenticity that the work was created by Cattelan as well as instructions about how to replace the fruit when it goes bad.
The installation auctioned on Wednesday was the third iteration — with the first one eaten by performance artist David Datuna, who said he felt “hungry” while inspecting it at the Miami show.
Sun, who founded cryptomoney exchange Tron, said that he intended to eat his investment too.
“In the coming days, I will personally eat the banana as part of this unique artistic experience, honoring its place in both art history and popular culture,” he said.
As well as his banana work, Cattelan is also known for producing an 18-carat, fully functioning gold toilet called “America” that was offered to Donald Trump during his first term in the White House.
His work is often humorous and deliberately provocative, with a 1999 sculpture of the pope stuck by a meteor titled “The Ninth Hour.”
He has explained the banana work as a critical commentary on the art market, which he has criticized in the past for being speculative and failing to help artists.
The asking price of $120,000 for “Comedian” in 2019 was seen at the time as evidence that the market was “bananas” and the art world had “gone mad,” as The New York Post said in a front-page article.
The banana sold on Wednesday was bought for 35 cents from a Bangladeshi fruit seller on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, according to The New York Times.
Sun has hit headlines in the past as an art collector and as a major player in the murky cryptocurrency world.
He was charged last year by the US Securities and Exchange Commission for alleged market manipulation and unregistered sales of crypto assets, which he promoted with celebrity endorsements, including from Lindsay Lohan.
In 2021, he bought Alberto Giacometti’s “Le Nez” for $78.4 million, which was hailed by Sotheby’s at the time as signaling “an influx of younger, tech-savvy collectors.”
Global art markets have been dropping in value in recent years due to higher interest rates, as well as concern about geopolitical instability, experts say.
“Empire of Light” (“L’Empire des lumieres“), a painting by Rene Magritte, shattered an auction record for the surrealist artist on Tuesday, however, selling for more than $121 million at Christie’s in New York.


Farmer in Argentina gets jail term for killing penguin chicks

Updated 21 November 2024
Follow

Farmer in Argentina gets jail term for killing penguin chicks

  • The sheep farmer was found guilty of destroying nests and killing chicks while clearing land along the Punta Tumbo nature reserve
  • In his defense, he said he had no choice but to clear the land as the state had failed to set up an access route to his property

BEUNOS AIRES: An Argentinian farmer was given a three-year prison sentence for animal cruelty Wednesday, likely to be commuted, after being found guilty of killing over 100 Patagonian penguin chicks.
The sheep farmer from the southern province of Chubut was found guilty last month of destroying dozens of nests and killing chicks in 2021 while clearing land along the Punta Tumbo nature reserve, home to one of the main colonies of Magellanic penguins on the Atlantic coast.
The farmer is unlikely to be incarcerated as Argentina’s penal code recommends alternatives to prison for a first conviction and sentences up to three years.
Prosecutors had requested a four-year sentence.
Environmental group Greenpeace, the complainant in the case, had welcomed the farmer’s conviction as “an important step for environmental justice.”
The farmer argued there was no choice but to clear the land as the state had failed to set up an access route to his property, or boundaries between his farm and the reserve.
The Magellanic Penguin is listed as a species of “least concern” on the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List, meaning it is not at risk of extinction even though numbers are in decline.