BERLIN: WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange vowed Tuesday to publish new “significant” documents related to the US presidential elections ahead of the Nov. 8 vote, as the online leaking platform celebrated its 10th birthday in defiant mood.
Taking aim at critics accusing him and his organization of manipulation, Assange pledged he would not be muzzled as he sought to raise “an army” of supporters to join in the defense of WikiLeaks.
“We hope to be publishing every week for the next 10 weeks. We have on schedule... all the US election related documents to come out before Nov. 8,” Assange, wearing a black T-shirt bearing the word “Truth,” told journalists via webcast from the Ecuadoran embassy in London where he has been holed up since 2012.
He refused to reveal if the US-vote related documents would hurt Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton or target her Republican rival Donald Trump.
But the white-haired WikiLeaks founder described the material as “significant” with “a lot of fascinating angles.”
“Do they show interesting features on power factions and how they operate? Yes they do,” he said.
Ten years after it was founded, Wikileaks has faced growing charges that it is manipulated by politicians — either by recycling documents provided by Moscow, or by allegedly serving the interests of Trump in the US presidential election race.
And Assange himself took refuge in the Ecuador embassy to avoid extradition to Sweden where he is accused of raping a woman while she was asleep.
The 45-year-old has always maintained the allegations are false and has refused to travel to Stockholm for questioning due to concerns that Sweden will hand him over to the US to stand trial for espionage.
He has come under fresh pressure after WikiLeaks published some 20,000 internal e-mails on the eve of the US Democratic Party convention that forced top party officials to quit.
Assange charged that WikiLeaks was now the target of a witch-hunt orchestrated in particular by Clinton, likening it to the repression of American communists in the 1950s driven by then senator Joseph McCarthy.
But he said he would not back down.
Rather, WikiLeaks will scale up operations to “amplify our publications and to defend us against what is really a quite remarkable McCarthyist push in the United States at the moment, principally by Hillary Clinton and her allies because she happens to be the person being exposed at the moment,” he said.
The domain name wikileaks.org was registered in 2006 and launched in January 2007, with Assange saying it would use encryption and a censorship-proof website to protect sources and publicize secret information.
The site has since published more than 10 million leaked documents.
It first caught the world’s attention when it released manuals for US prison guards at Guantanamo Bay.
But it really hit its stride in 2010, unveiling logs of US military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and a video showing a US helicopter crew mowing down a group of unarmed civilians — including two journalists — in Baghdad.
That same year it also published a cache of diplomatic cables from US embassies around the world, deeply embarrassing Washington.
But Assange’s abrasive style and insistence on publishing unredacted documents quickly grated on colleagues and journalists who worked with him.
“If an Afghan civilian helps coalition forces, he deserves to die,” Guardian journalist Nick Davies later recalled Assange saying in an argument over whether to remove names from the war logs.
Top US government officials have called him a security threat.
Assange pledged to expand WikiLeaks’ activities through extra staff and new media partnerships, with plans to employ 100 more journalists over the next three years.
“We’re going to need... an army to defend us from the pressure that is already starting to arrive,” he said, adding that, “we will give if necessary a call to arms if pressure increases more than it already has.”
And even if he were forced to resign one day, “the publication will continue,” pledged Assange, who had canceled at the last minute what would have been a rare public appearance Tuesday on the balcony of his 18-square-meter room in the Ecuadorean embassy, citing security reasons.
WikiLeaks vows to release more document before US vote
WikiLeaks vows to release more document before US vote
Top Ukrainian defense official sacked amid infighting over procurement
As well as requesting Dmytro Klimenkov’s removal, Umerov leveled particular criticism at the Defense Procurement Agency
KYIV: Ukraine’s government on Tuesday sacked a deputy defense minister in charge of weapons purchases amid infighting over procurement that is complicating Kyiv’s attempt to reassure key Western partners at a critical moment in the war with Russia.
The dispute burst into the open last week after Defense Minister Rustem Umerov criticized Ukraine’s arms procurement effort as having failed to deliver results for frontline troops.
Ukraine has sought to clean up defense spending as the war grinds toward its fourth year, an effort that has taken on greater importance as US President Donald Trump considers whether to continue supporting Kyiv’s military.
As well as requesting Dmytro Klimenkov’s removal, Umerov leveled particular criticism at the Defense Procurement Agency, which coordinates weapons purchases for Ukraine’s outgunned military.
The agency was established after a series of allegations earlier in the war of ministry misspending, and has aimed to cut out intermediaries and minimize the risk of corruption.
In a statement on Friday, Umerov said it had “inexplicably transformed into an ‘Amazon’” and its purchases were too publicly visible. Ukraine has long sought to keep details of arms procurement a closely guarded secret.
Umerov also said that he would not renew a contract with agency chief Maryna Bezrukova, a reformer whose appointment last year had been applauded by Kyiv’s Western partners. He pledged to install a new director.
The agency said in response that it had made “significant progress” in boosting supply and lowering prices, and that it would continue working under Bezrukova.
The standoff comes as Ukrainian troops face Russian advances across swathes of the east. Both sides are attempting to gain a battlefield edge ahead of any potential peace talks, but Kyiv’s defenses are buckling amid a shortage of men and weapons.
President Volodymyr Zelensky has urged Western partners to keep arms flowing to Ukraine. The defense ministry’s own anti-corruption council, comprised of elected civic activists, said the infighting could compromise that effort.
“We believe the current situation is harmful to Ukraine, the Ukrainian military and our international relations,” it said on Saturday. “We must be clear and predictable for partners.”
In a statement on Monday, G7 diplomats in Ukraine urged officials to quickly resolve the dispute.
“Consistency with good governance principles and NATO recommendations is important to maintain the trust of public and international partners,” they wrote.
Lawsuit says Russian officials stole millions meant to fortify border region attacked by Ukraine
- The trio was arrested and sent to pre-trial detention on corruption charges in December and January, Russian media reported
- They face up to 10 years in prison if found guilty
LONDON: Russian prosecutors are seeking to recover nearly $33 million of funds that they say were allocated for the defense of the western Kursk region, invaded by Ukraine last year, but stolen instead by corrupt officials.
Ukrainian troops stormed across the border in a surprise attack on Aug. 6 and seized a chunk of Russian territory, some of which they still hold — a valuable bargaining chip for Kyiv in any peace talks with Moscow.
A lawsuit filed by the office of Russia’s Prosecutor General orders the head of the Kursk Regional Development Corporation, his deputies and a number of businessmen to repay more than 3.2 billion roubles ($32.7 million) allegedly embezzled from the regional defense budget, state news agency RIA reported.
In the two years prior to Ukraine’s attack, the governor in charge of Kursk at the time had repeatedly told the public that Russia had boosted its fortifications along the region’s 150-mile (240 km) border with Ukraine.
“Right now the risk of an armed invasion of the territory of Kursk region from Ukraine is not high,” Roman Starovoit assured residents in November 2022. “However, we are constantly working to strengthen the region’s defense capabilities.”
The next month, he posed in a snowy field beside a row of pyramid-shaped anti-tank defenses known as “dragon’s teeth.”
But in the autumn of 2023, Ukraine’s National Resistance Center, created by the special operations forces, said in an online post that reconnaissance showed “almost all the strongholds are deserted of personnel and equipment” along the border with Kursk. Corruption was a factor, it said.
Vidео published by Ukrainian paratroopers during the early days of the August incursion showed columns of armored vehicles pouring into Kursk through the rows of dragon’s teeth.
’ILLEGAL ENRICHMENT’
Between 2022 and 2023, some 19.4 billion roubles were pumped from Russia’s federal budget to Kursk, according to RIA, to build defenses such as ditches and dragon’s teeth.
The lawsuit alleges that officials instead funnelled that money into contracts with over a half-dozen companies controlled by several business people. The companies created “the appearance of performing work on the construction of protective structures and put in place a false scheme of expenses,” it says.
The head of the regional development fund and two of his deputies “used their official position for personal purposes...(and) for their illegal enrichment through the wrongful seizure of budget funds allocated for the protection and strengthening of the country’s defense capabilities against enemy invasion.”
The trio was arrested and sent to pre-trial detention on corruption charges in December and January, Russian media reported. They face up to 10 years in prison if found guilty. One of the businessmen named in the suit, whose firm carried out construction work in Kursk, was placed in pre-trial detention last week.
Reuters was unable to locate lawyers for the detained individuals for comment.
“Everyone who has broken the law should know that there will be no leniency or indulgence for him,” Kursk’s acting regional governor Alexander Khinshtein posted on Telegram on Tuesday.
“Especially when it concerns such a vital topic for all Kurskites as the construction of fortifications!“
Germany scraps Rwanda meeting over DR Congo fighting
- A spokesman for Germany’s development ministry said it had “canceled the government consultations planned for February with Rwanda“
- “There can be no business as usual amid the current escalation”
BERLIN: Germany said Tuesday it had canceled a planned meeting with Rwandan officials next month over Rwanda’s role in fighting in Democratic Republic of Congo.
A lightning offensive in the eastern DRC by fighters from the M23 armed group and Rwandan forces has led to clashes around the besieged city of Goma and a spiralling humanitarian crisis.
A spokesman for Germany’s development ministry said it had “canceled the government consultations planned for February with Rwanda” and was “co-ordinating with other donors about further measures.”
“There can be no business as usual amid the current escalation,” the spokesman said in a statement.
He said “talks on development cooperation can only resume when Rwanda and M23 end the escalation and withdraw.”
At least 17 people have been killed and 367 wounded during two days of fighting, according to reports from Goma hospitals.
The United Nations said Tuesday that food assistance in and around Goma had been “paused” and voiced concern over food shortages.
The UN Security Council was to meet on Tuesday to discuss the conflict.
The United States and France have also condemned the offensive by M23 and Rwandan forces while Britain expressed “deep concern” at the violence and called for de-escalation.
Afghan Taliban leader dismisses foreign ‘threats’ after ICC warrant
- Akhundzada did not reference specific countries, bodies or “threats“
- Since sweeping back to power in 2021, the Taliban authorities have implemented a strict interpretation of Islamic law
KABUL: Afghanistan’s supreme leader has said the Taliban will not be intimidated by “threats” in a speech given days after the International Criminal Court prosecutor requested a warrant for his arrest over the persecution of women in the country.
“Whether Westerners or Easterners, how could we believe them and not almighty God’s promises! How can we allow ourselves to be affected by their threats!” Hibatullah Akhundzada said in a recording of a speech shared with journalists on Tuesday.
The address was given at a graduation ceremony for religious scholars in southern Kandahar province on Monday, said the governor’s spokesman, Mahmood Azzam.
The reclusive Taliban leader, who rules by decree from Kandahar, has made only a handful of appearances since inheriting the Islamist movement’s leadership, with only audio recordings released of his rare speeches given in closed settings.
Taliban members are “Muslims who stand for what is right and cannot be harmed by anybody. If anyone stands against them, from the West or East, nobody can harm them,” Akhundzada said.
Akhundzada did not reference specific countries, bodies or “threats,” but the speech came days after the ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan said he was seeking arrest warrants for the Taliban supreme leader and chief justice over the persecution of women.
Since sweeping back to power in 2021 — ousting the Western-backed government and ending a 20-year insurgency — the Taliban authorities have implemented a strict interpretation of Islamic law.
They have imposed restrictions on women and girls the United Nations has characterised as “gender apartheid.”
Afghanistan is the only country in the world where girls and women are banned from education.
Women have been ordered to cover their hair and faces and wear all-covering Islamic dress, have been barred from parks and stopped from working in government offices.
The Taliban government claims it secures Afghan women’s rights under sharia but many of its edicts are not followed in the rest of the Islamic world and have been condemned by Muslim leaders.
Danish PM says received European support over Trump’s Greenland bid
- “This is a very, very clear message... that of course there must be respect for territory and the sovereignty of states,” Frederiksen said
- Trump has signalled that he wants the Arctic island — which is believed to hold large untapped mineral and oil reserves — to become part of the US
COPENHAGEN: Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen on Tuesday said she had received support from European leaders as she sought backing to counter US President Donald Trump’s threats to take over Greenland.
After an initial stopover in Berlin in the morning, Frederiksen was in Paris by midday and due to travel to Brussels in the afternoon to meet NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte.
Following a meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron, the Danish head of government told reporters she had received “a great deal of support.”
“This is a very, very clear message... that of course there must be respect for territory and the sovereignty of states,” Frederiksen said.
“This is a crucial part of the international community, the international community that we have built together since World War II,” she added.
Trump has signalled that he wants the Arctic island — which is believed to hold large untapped mineral and oil reserves — to become part of the United States.
He has talked for years about a possible deal to take control of the Danish autonomous territory.
On Saturday, he told reporters he believed that the United States would “get Greenland,” which is located between the United States and Europe in a region of increasing strategic value as the melting of Arctic sea ice opens up new shipping routes.
Trump argues his country needs Greenland for “international security.”
But Denmark’s Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen on Tuesday retorted that “Trump will not have Greenland.”
“Greenland is Greenland. And the Greenlandic people are a people, also in the sense of international law,” Lokke told reporters.
Frederiksen met early on Tuesday with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz in Berlin.
After speaking about Russia’s war in Ukraine, Scholz stressed that “borders must not be moved by force” and added the English-language phrase: “To whom it may concern.”
The chancellor said “the times we live in are challenging” and require a strong Europe and NATO. He stressed that “Denmark and Germany are strong partners and close friends.”
Tuesday’s visits followed a weekend Nordic summit where leaders all “shared the gravity of the situation,” Frederiksen said.
Denmark on Monday announced that it would spend 14.6 billion kroner ($2 billion) to bolster security in the Arctic.
It said it would send three new frigates to the region, as well as long-distance drones equipped with advanced imaging capabilities. It would also reinforce its satellite capabilities.
Officials in Greenland, which depends heavily on Denmark for subsidies, have long been pushing for independence but have said they are open to doing business with the US.
A day after Trump was sworn in as president, Greenland Prime Minister Mute Egede insisted that Greenlanders “don’t want to be American.”
In mid-January, Frederiksen reportedly spoke to Trump by telephone, stressing that it was up to Greenland to determine its future.
According to European sources cited by the Financial Times, Danish officials described the conversation as “horrendous,” and that Trump’s interest in Greenland was “serious, and potentially very dangerous.”
The US president, who has not excluded a possible military intervention to annex the island, reportedly threatened Denmark with tariffs over the issue.
The United States is the small Scandinavian country’s main export market.
Greenland’s trade and justice minister Naaja Nathanielsen on Monday told AFP that the Greenlandic people were living through a “worrying time” and were “concerned” about Trump’s statements.
“As a government, our job is not to panic and to figure out what the actual demands are,” Nathanielsen said.
“If it is about military presence, the US has been here for 80 years, we are not opposed to that. If it is about the minerals, it is an open market,” she added.
But, she warned, “if it is about expansionism, we are a democracy, we are allies and we ask our allies to respect our institutions.”
The European Union’s top military official on Saturday said that troops from EU countries could be based in Greenland.
“In my view, it would make perfect sense not only to station US forces in Greenland, as is currently the case, but also to consider stationing EU soldiers there,” Robert Brieger, chairman of the European Union Military Committee told German newspaper Welt am Sonntag.
France’s Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot did not rule out the possibility of European troops in Greenland.
“Why not, since it is a matter of security,” Barrot told Sud Radio on Tuesday.
He stressed, however, that “that is not the wish expressed by Denmark, but it is a possibility.”
