In Pakistan’s Gujrat, two Chaudhrys in bare-knuckle election fight after family feud 

1 / 4
Politics in the Gujrat district has revolved around the cousin duo of Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain and Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi, above, for the last four decades. (AN Photo)
Short Url
Updated 06 February 2024
Follow

In Pakistan’s Gujrat, two Chaudhrys in bare-knuckle election fight after family feud 

  • Ex-PM Khan’s party is backing Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi’s group, while Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain has support from Sharif’s PML-N
  • Many independent observers seeing the contest as a test of support for the embattled ex-PM Khan against the all-powerful military

GUJRAT: In Pakistan, bitter electoral contests between blood relatives, fellow tribesmen and traditional rivals are the hallmark of any election.

But this election season, all eyes are on a bare-knuckle battle between two stalwarts of the powerful and hard-nosed Chaudhry clan, an influential political family from Punjab province, the country’s most populous, which has split in its support for two of the main contenders of Pakistani politics: three-time Premier Nawaz Sharif and former cricketing hero and now jailed ex-Prime Minister Imran Khan.

Politics in the Gujrat district, located between the famous Jhelum and Chenab rivers, an area that once formed part of the Paurava kingdom of King Porus, has revolved around the cousin duo of Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain and Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi for the last four decades. 

Both are now leading opposing campaigns for the National Assembly constituency, NA-64, in Gujrat, once the fort of the united Chaudhry clan, with many independent observers seeing the contest as a test of support for the embattled ex-PM Khan against the all-powerful military, the ultimate wielder of power in Pakistani politics. 

Suhail Warraich, a prominent political analyst and journalist who has covered Punjab politics for almost three decades, said the Feb. 8 elections in NA-64 would be a “do-or-die” case for the two Chaudhry family groups.

“Currently, the politics of Punjab is based on a pro-PTI and anti-PTI vote bank,” Warraich told Arab News, referring to the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party of ex-PM Khan. 

“The current election is a do-or-die scenario for both factions as each is determined to secure victory and garner the support of the Chaudhry family’s traditional voters. The outcome will significantly enhance the winner’s influence and presence in this constituency.”

The Chaudhry cousins were initially part of Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz but split from the party over political differences after the 1997 general elections.

The family, led by Hussain, openly supported the 1999 military coup by Gen. Pervez Musharraf against the then Sharif government. In 2002, Hussain and Elahi launched their own party, the Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid, which later became an integral part of the Musharraf government and appointed its own prime minister, Shaukat Aziz.

Over the next two decades, the PML-Q, widely seen as a key political operative for Musharraf and a “king’s party” in Pakistani politics, often helped make or break governments in the South Asian country with its limited, yet decisive number of seats in the national and provincial assemblies.

But the decades-long partnership between the two Chaudhrys ended in 2022, when Elahi decided to back Khan in a parliamentary vote of no confidence in which he was ousted from the prime minister’s office. Hussain, on the other hand, chose to side with Khan’s opponents, including Sharif’s PML-N and the Pakistan People’s Party of the Bhutto political dynasty, whose alliance formed the government at the center after Khan was removed. 

The tussle between the two Chaudhrys reached its crescendo in July 2022 when Hussain attempted to block Elahi from becoming the chief minister of Punjab by asking the PML-Q provincial lawmakers not to vote for his cousin in the CM’s election.

After this, Elahi formally bid farewell to the PML-Q and joined Khan’s PTI party as its president. Although the two Chaudhrys have not spoken against each other publicly since, their sons often trade barbs online and at public meetings.

Elahi has been in jail since June 2023 on a raft of charges, and his American-educated son Moonis Elahi, living in exile since Dec. 2023, has been disqualified from contesting elections. In their absence, the PTI is backing Elahi’s wife, Qaisra, and her sister, Sumaira, who stepped into electoral politics on behalf of the father-son duo.

Qaisra is contesting the elections as a PTI-backed independent candidate from NA-64 against her nephew and Hussain’s son, Salik, who is contesting as a PML-Q candidate and enjoys the support of the PML-N. Sumaira, who is also backed by Khan’s PTI, is vying for the provincial assembly seat, PP-34, in Gujrat.

“Mentally, we both sisters were not ready to become (members of a provincial or national assembly). This journey unfolded because Moonis (Elahi) is out of the country, and Pervez (Elahi) Sahib is in jail,” Sumaira told Arab News in an interview in Gujrat.

“From the beginning, our position has been that our involvement in these elections is solely because of them and these seats belong to them. And after winning, these seats will be for them.”

But with Elahi in jail and Moonis in exile, what has been the impact on their vote bank? 

“There is no impact on the vote bank. The vote bank, in fact, has increased,” Sumaira said.
“Initially, we didn’t have this many votes before (joining) PTI. We had our own voters, Pervaiz had his own, Moonis had his own voters. But after (Elahi) joined PTI, our votes have increased.”

Sumaira believes Elahi parting ways with Hussain and standing staunchly by Khan has earned him the respect of PTI supporters.

“PTI supporters are backing us the way they are doing for Imran Khan because they see how Pervaiz Elahi is firmly supporting Imran Khan. Thus, they are supporting us,” Sumaira added. 

“On the ground, the way people are supporting us now, we didn’t have it before.”

Khan himself was convicted on graft charges and jailed last August. This month, he received three additional jail terms of 10, 14 and seven years each in three different cases. He is also disqualified from running for public office for 10 years.

In Gujrat, the current election fight between the Chaudhrys has included charges of armed intimidation while the threat of violence and the suspicion of rigging hang thick in the air. In past elections, the united Chaudhrys have often been accused of using private family militia and the Punjab police to intimidate voters and opponents. 

Like many other PTI-backed candidates, Sumaira also complained of what she described as “coercive actions” by the state machinery to stop her family from electioneering in Gujrat.

“In Gujarat city, you won’t see our gatherings or meetings,” she said. “We can’t hold a corner meeting because if anyone plans to host our meeting, they start intimidating him.”

When asked who was behind the harassment campaign, she blamed the caretaker Punjab government. 

“People often bring the (military) establishment into the discourse, but I doubt their involvement at this lower level,” Sumaira said. She also blamed her opponent and nephew Salik, the son of Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain, for the “mess” her part of the family was facing.

Speaking to Arab News, Salik denied involvement in any mistreatment of his aunts and blamed the Chaudhry family split on the “egoistic behavior” of some of its members, particularly Elahi’s son Moonis.

“Moonis Elahi’s primary concern is what will happen to his political career if Salik Hussain wins the election here in Gujrat,” Salik said. 

In an interview with a local TV channel, Salik said he had never had a problem with his cousin Moonis being the heir to the political throne, but “if he wanted to be the bigger one in the family, then he should have acted like the bigger one.”

He told senior journalist Jugnu Mohson: “There is no fundamental issue between the two families, it’s a problem of egos.

“Tolerance with one another could patch up the two families,” he added.

However, when asked by Arab News if there was a chance the family could reunite after elections, Salik told Arab News it was unlikely as electoral politics was not the “bone of contention” between the two groups but the fact that Elahi and Moonis always “wanted to make decisions” and wanted others to obey them without question.

“My opposition isn’t driven by personal gain,” Salik insisted, saying Elahi would regret his decision to back Khan. 

“What have they gained from this entire political game? A leader like Imran Khan, and they are not even in his good books.”

Warraich, the analyst, agreed that it was unlikely the two groups would reunite after the Feb. 8 elections.

“Since Pervaiz Elahi has served time in jail and faced challenging times,” he said, “it is likely that instead of striking a deal with Shujaat Hussain after the elections, he would prefer to continue aligning with the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf.”


UK pro-Israel group slammed for suggesting war could reduce Gaza obesity

Updated 10 May 2025
Follow

UK pro-Israel group slammed for suggesting war could reduce Gaza obesity

  • Comments follow warnings by UN, aid agencies that enclave faces imminent famine
  • Council for Arab-British Understanding, Palestine Solidarity Campaign label remarks ‘atrocious’, ‘utterly sickening’, ‘repulsive’

LONDON: A pro-Israel pressure group in the UK has been condemned for suggesting that Palestinians in the Gaza Strip may benefit from a reduction in obesity levels arising from the war, The Guardian reported on Saturday.

The comments — made by Jonathan Turner, head of UK Lawyers for Israel — followed a series of warnings by the UN and aid agencies that Gaza faces imminent famine.

Turner, on behalf of UKLFI, was responding to a motion set to be debated at the annual general meeting of the Co-operative Group, a major British retailer.

The motion calls for the Co-operative to stop stocking Israeli products, as part of the worldwide Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement. UKLFI urged the Co-operative council to withdraw the motion.

In doing so, Turner highlighted the motion’s reference to a letter published last year by The Lancet, a leading medical journal, which said the death toll in Gaza could be far higher than the 52,000 put forth by the enclave’s Health Ministry.

Turner said the letter “ignored factors that may increase average life expectancy in Gaza, bearing in mind that one of the biggest health issues in Gaza prior to the current war was obesity … These factors include the possible reduction in the availability of confectionery and cigarettes.”

Chris Doyle, director of the Council for Arab-British Understanding, said on X that Turner’s comments represent “atrocious views,” adding: “How very kind of Israel to put 2.3 million Palestinians on an enforced diet to improve their obesity levels.”

The Lancet has published several studies relating to Israel’s war in Gaza. One found that life expectancy in the enclave plunged by 34.9 years during the first year of the war. Gaza’s pre-war life expectancy was 75.5 years.

Since March, Israel has implemented a total blockade on the entry of humanitarian goods to the enclave.

Ben Jamal, director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, said: “As children in the Gaza Strip face the growing risk of starvation, illness and death, the suggestion by the head of UK Lawyers for Israel that they might benefit from weight loss is utterly sickening.

“These repulsive comments illustrate exactly what it means to be ‘for Israel’ and how low its apologists are prepared to sink in their attempts to justify genocide in Gaza.”

UKLFI previously faced controversy over the removal of artwork made by Palestinian children in a London hospital.

The organization submitted a complaint to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital in 2023, claiming that artwork created by Palestinian children and displayed in the facility made Jewish patients feel “vulnerable, harassed and victimized.” The hospital removed the works.


Amnesty International says at least 30 dead in separatist attack in southeastern Nigeria

Updated 10 May 2025
Follow

Amnesty International says at least 30 dead in separatist attack in southeastern Nigeria

  • No group has claimed responsibility for the attack
  • The rights group said “international law requires the Nigerian government to promptly investigate unlawful killings”

ABUJA: At least 30 people have been killed after gunmen attacked travelers on a major highway in the southeastern part of Nigeria, rights group Amnesty International said.

The rights group said more than 20 vehicles and trucks were set ablaze during the Thursday attack along the Okigwe-Owerri highway in Imo state. Police confirmed the attack but not the death toll.

No group has claimed responsibility for the attack, but police suspect the Eastern Security Network, the paramilitary wing of the proscribed separatist group Indigenous People of Biafra.

The secessionist campaign in southeastern Nigeria dates back to when the short-lived Republic of Biafra fought and lost a civil war from 1967 to 1970 to become independent from the West African country. An estimated 1 million people died in the conflict, many from starvation.

The rights group said “international law requires the Nigerian government to promptly investigate unlawful killings with a view to bringing perpetrators to justice.”

One suspect connected to the attack was killed in a joint operation by law enforcement agencies, police spokesperson Okoye Henry said in a statement.

“An intensive manhunt is ongoing to apprehend the fleeing suspects and bring them to justice,” Henry said.

Two of the group’s prominent leaders, Nnamdi Kanu and Simon Ekpa, are in custody in Nigeria and Finland, respectively.

Kanu is standing trial on a seven-count charge bordering on terrorism and treasonable felony. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges.

The Nigerian government said Friday it has not begun extradition proceedings but is in talks with Finnish authorities to ensure Ekpa is held accountable for his alleged actions.

For many years Nigeria — Africa’s most populous nation with at least 210 million people — has been wracked by violence related to the activities of armed extremist groups.


Polish nationalists stage anti-immigration demo ahead of polls

Updated 10 May 2025
Follow

Polish nationalists stage anti-immigration demo ahead of polls

  • The protest, organized by the nationalist opposition, drew demonstrators from across Poland
  • Immigration is a central issue in the central European country ahead of the May 18 election

WARSAW: Several thousand people demonstrated in Warsaw on Saturday against illegal immigration and the pro-European government of Prime Minister Donald Tusk, a week before the EU member chooses a new president.

The protest, organized by the nationalist opposition, drew demonstrators from across Poland, who carried the red and white national flag and chanted slogans such as “no to immigration.”

Immigration is a central issue in the central European country ahead of the May 18 election.

Poland currently hosts around one million refugees from the war in neighboring Ukraine, and has accused Russia and Belarus of orchestrating a wave of immigration into the European Union member.

The protesters made their way toward the seat of government in central Warsaw, chanting the name of nationalist presidential candidate Karol Nawrocki.

The 42-year-old fan of US President Donald Trump has the backing of the right-wing opposition Law and Justice party and outgoing President Andrzej Duda.

He is polling second in the presidential race, with around 25 percent support.

The frontrunner, Warsaw’s pro-European Union Mayor Rafal Trzaskowski, has the support of Tusk’s Civic Coalition and is polling on 32 percent.

“Poland has to defend itself against illegal immigration. These migrants have their own countries. They should stay there,” 66-year-old farmer Boguslaw Uchmanowicz told AFP.


Taliban arrest 14 people for playing music and singing

Updated 10 May 2025
Follow

Taliban arrest 14 people for playing music and singing

  • Those detained were under investigation
  • Wedding halls are no longer allowed to play music

KABUL: Taliban authorities have arrested 14 people in northern Afghanistan for playing musical instruments and singing, activities they restricted since taking power, provincial police said on Saturday.

The Taliban government has steadily imposed laws and regulations that reflect their austere vision of Islamic law since seizing power in 2021.

This includes cracking down on music in public, from live performances to playing at gatherings, in restaurants, in cars or on radio and TV.

The police said in a statement that on Thursday night in the capital of northern Takhar province “fourteen individuals... took advantage of the nighttime to gather in a residential house where they were playing musical instruments and singing songs, which caused disturbance to the public.”

Those detained were under investigation, it added.

After their takeover, Taliban authorities shuttered music schools and smashed or burned musical instruments and sound systems, saying music caused “moral corruption” and public disturbance.

Wedding halls are no longer allowed to play music, though segregated women’s sections often do so secretly.

Many Afghan musicians fled the Taliban takeover out of fear or in need of work after losing their livelihoods in one of the world’s poorest countries.

The Taliban authorities have encouraged former musicians to turn their talents to Islamic poetry and unaccompanied vocal chants — the only forms of music allowed under their previous rule from 1996-2001.


Newly elected Reform UK councillors face scrutiny over Islamophobic social media posts

Updated 10 May 2025
Follow

Newly elected Reform UK councillors face scrutiny over Islamophobic social media posts

  • Party made major breakthrough at last week’s local elections
  • Campaign group: ‘They have yet to drop any of the candidates that have been exposed’

LONDON: Up to a dozen newly elected councillors from Reform UK have been accused of posting Islamophobic and far-right content on social media, The Guardian reported on Saturday.

It comes a week after the party made a major breakthrough in local elections across the country, winning 677 of the more than 1,600 contested seats.

Reform UK councillors at three country councils have shared social media content from Britain First, a far-right party known for its anti-Islam views.

Paul Harrison, who was elected to Leicestershire’s county council, retweeted and voted “yes” to an X poll asking if the UK should conduct mass deportations.

The post was accompanied by an image, generated by artificial intelligence, of Muslim men holding Pakistani flags.

Reform UK officials are facing greater scrutiny in the wake of the local elections, with many of the social media posts being revealed by counter-extremism campaign group Hope Not Hate.

Its director of campaigns, Georgie Laming, said: “(Party leader) Nigel Farage has claimed that Reform UK have the ‘most in-depth vetting procedure’ of any party. Our investigation shows that their processes leave much to be desired.

“Not only have they admitted using ‘AI techniques and other things’ to do the vetting, but Reform UK continue to shirk responsibility for their candidates’ online behaviour. They have yet to drop any of the candidates that have been exposed.”

The campaign group previously uncovered Islamophobic content posted by Reform candidates on social media, as well as far-right conspiracies and support for extremist figures including Tommy Robinson and David Irving.