Why pressure is growing to finalize UK-GCC free trade agreement

The UK believes a GCC FTA would increase bilateral trade by 16 percent. (SPA/File)
Short Url
Updated 05 February 2025
Follow

Why pressure is growing to finalize UK-GCC free trade agreement

  • Britain’s financial woes and US President Donald Trump’s trade wars loom over negotiators working to get deal over the line
  • The deal would eliminate tariffs, reduce trade barriers, and facilitate business cooperation in key sectors like AI and renewables

LONDON: The UK’s economic fragility and global turmoil from President Donald Trump’s trade wars have given increased impetus for Britain to reach a free trade agreement with the Gulf Cooperation Council.

Talks for a deal between the six-nation bloc and Britain are continuing apace after restarting in September and are said to be at an advanced stage.

Yet the agreement could not come soon enough for the UK government, which is struggling to breathe life into a stagnant economy.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer has prioritized growth, and a GCC FTA would bring a significant boost to the UK’s finances and the governing Labour Party’s political fortunes.

The benefits would also be plentiful for Gulf countries, many of which have embarked on extensive reforms to diversify their economies away from hydrocarbons and toward modern sectors.




Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman receives British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Riyadh. (SPA/File)

Details of the negotiations are closely guarded, but economists and experts told Arab News they believe a final deal is close and that there is will from both sides to get the agreement in place.

“The UK government has signaled that it wants to attract more investment into the economy, and its new drive for growth should certainly give momentum to the determination of UK negotiators to push forward the talks on the FTA toward a satisfactory conclusion,” said Bandar Reda, secretary-general and CEO of the Arab-British Chamber of Commerce.

“With a fair degree of optimism then we can probably look forward to a positive outcome being achieved a little sooner than previously expected.”

The UK believes a GCC FTA would increase bilateral trade by 16 percent and could add an extra £8.6 billion ($10.7 billion) a year to the existing £57.4 billion worth of annual trade between the two sides.

Officials say it could also boost UK annual workers’ wages by around £600 million to £1.1 billion every year and increase UK GDP by between £1.6 and £3.1 billion by 2035.

The UK has been looking to forge fresh trade deals since leaving the EU, its biggest trading partner, in 2020.

With already strong trade links and historic ties to Gulf countries, establishing an agreement with the GCC as a whole became a priority.

Consisting of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman and Kuwait, the GCC economic and political union is also seeking to make more trade agreements as a bloc.




Britain's Queen Camilla, Qatar's Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani, Britain's King Charles III and Sheikha Jawaher bint Hamad bin Suhaim al-Thani in London. (AFP/File)

A UK government report published in 2022 said an FTA with the GCC “is an opportunity to boost trade with an economically and strategically important group of countries, support jobs and advance our global interests.”

After the July election brought in his new UK government, Starmer prioritized relations with the Gulf, and a seventh round of trade negotiations got underway.

Jonathan Reynolds, the business and trade secretary, visited the region in September and delegations have traveled back and forth since.

The latest negotiation team from the GCC was in London last month, according to the Department for Business and Trade.

Starmer traveled to Saudi Arabia in December and met with Prime Minister and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. He also visited the UAE and hosted the Qatari emir in London.

Several deals were announced during those meetings, as the new government made clear that attracting foreign investment from Gulf countries was key to its growth strategy.

At the same time, the economic pressures on Starmer’s administration have increased. Despite a relatively strong start to 2024, the UK economy failed to grow in the second half of the year.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves came under fire for her first budget, which dented business confidence with a series of tax hikes.

With UK borrowing costs hitting their highest level for several years last month, boosting trade with a bloc like the GCC through an FTA would be a significant boon for Starmer.

But it is not just the UK’s domestic economic woes that are looming over negotiators. With the US administration’s threats to impose tariffs on both allies and adversaries causing global financial uncertainty, Gulf countries will also be keen to ease trade restrictions with a major partner like the UK.




British Prime Minister Keir Starmer meets UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan at the Shati Palace in Abu Dhabi. (AFP/File)

“One effect of the threat of tariffs might be to add urgency to the negotiations to conclude the UK-GCC FTA,” Reda, of the Arab-British Chamber of Commerce, told Arab News.

Primarily, the agreement would remove or reduce tariff barriers to trade between GCC countries and the UK, easing the flow of goods and services.

The average tariff applied to UK exports by the GCC is around 5.5 percent, whereas imports from the Gulf face a 5.8 percent levy. However, the UK places no tariffs on oil and gas bought from GCC countries, and this accounts for most of the import value.

Still, removing the tariffs would help businesses on both sides by reducing costs but would particularly benefit the UK given that its exports account for 60 percent of total trade.

Perhaps more important, according to Freddie Neve, lead Middle East associate at the London-based Asia House think tank, would be removing red tape faced by importers and exporters.




Primarily, the agreement would remove or reduce tariff barriers to trade between GCC countries and the UK, easing the flow of goods and services. (SPA)

“While reducing tariffs on these goods is an obvious target in the negotiations, arguably a larger opportunity relates to the reduction of non-tariff barriers,” Neve said. “These relate to regulations, standards, and procedures required of foreign firms to do business.

“A government analysis published before negotiations counted over 4,500 non-tariff measures applied by the GCC on the UK. Naturally, some of these will have been ameliorated by recent Gulf economic reforms, but an FTA that reduces these barriers would make it easier for UK companies to operate in and across the GCC.”

While the timing of the FTA would be good for the UK it also fits perfectly with the timetable of economic diversification underway in the GCC.




An FTA negotiation is a vast and complex process and there may well still be sticking points to be ironed out before a final deal is reached. (AFP/File)

Saudi Arabia and the UAE in particular are moving away from reliance on oil revenues to modern, technology-driven economies.

Investing in the UK means they are able to tap into services and expertise in sectors where Britain has a competitive advantage, such as technology, life sciences, creative industries, education and financial services.

In particular, the UK’s 2022 assessment predicted an FTA would allow for cooperation in “industries of the future” such as artificial intelligence and renewable energy, in which Gulf countries are investing heavily.

“Over the past three years, innovations in AI and related sectors to do with the digital economy, e-commerce, advanced data and computing have developed enormously,” Reda said. “The Gulf states have all been seeking to position themselves at the forefront of these developments that are reshaping how we do business.

“These areas open up major new areas for UK-GCC cooperation as we all seek to maximize the potential offered by AI and cutting-edge tech. The FTA should give a tremendous boost to cooperation in these industries of the future.”

INNUMBERS

• 16% Potential increase in bilateral trade resulting from UK-GCC free trade agreement.

• £8.6bn What the FTA could add to the existing £57.4bn worth of annual bilateral trade.

• £1.6-£3.1bn Possible boost to UK GDP by 2035, raising wages to £1.1bn per year.


An FTA negotiation is a vast and complex process and there may well still be sticking points to be ironed out before a final deal is reached.

Douglas Alexander, the UK’s minister of state for trade policy and economic security, said in December that negotiators on the GCC agreement continued to have “constructive discussions on areas of sustainable trade,” such as environment and labor.

MPs have raised questions over whether the UK should be focusing on a GCC-wide agreement rather than individual deals with Gulf countries, citing variations in policies and regulations across the bloc.

But the GCC countries have been developing their concerted approach to trade and are pursuing similar agreements with the EU, China, and Turkiye.




Prime Minister Keir Starmer has prioritized growth, and a GCC FTA would bring a significant boost to the UK finances. (SPA/File)

“Negotiations with a bloc are always more challenging than bilateral deals,” Justin Alexander, a director at US consultancy Khalij Economics, told Arab News. “However, the GCC is functioning in the most joined-up way I have seen in my career, and all the GCC members are important partners for the UK, so it is highly motivated to make this work.”

He said he was not aware of any significant obstacles remaining in the talks and believed the deal is very near completion.

“The most significant element of the UK-GCC FTA for both sides will be the fact that it has been done, setting a precedent for further trade deals for both parties,” Alexander said. “Both sides are open, globally integrated economies and would benefit from modern trade deals.”

The Department for Business and Trade said trade deals played a “vital role” in the government’s mission for economic growth.

“We’re seeking a modern trade deal with the Gulf as a priority, and our focus is securing a deal that delivers real value to businesses on both sides, rather than getting it done by a specific date,” the department said.

 


Trump says Israel-Iran ceasefire is in effect after deal initially faltered

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

Trump says Israel-Iran ceasefire is in effect after deal initially faltered

Israel had earlier accused Iran of launching missiles into its airspace after the truce was supposed to take effect
“All planes will turn around and head home, while doing a friendly “Plane Wave” to Iran. Nobody will be hurt, the Ceasefire is in effect!” Trump said

BEERSHEBA, Israel: US President Donald Trump said a ceasefire between Iran and Israel was in effect Tuesday after the deal initially faltered and the American leader expressed deep frustration with both sides.

Israel had earlier accused Iran of launching missiles into its airspace after the truce was supposed to take effect and the Israeli finance minister vowed “Tehran will tremble.”

Iran’s military denied firing on Israel, state media reported — but explosions boomed and sirens sounded across northern Israel midmorning, and an Israeli military official said two Iranian missiles were intercepted.

Trump told reporters at the White House before departing for a NATO summit that in his view, both sides had violated the nascent agreement. He had particularly strong words for Israel, a close ally, while suggesting Iran may have fired on the country by mistake.

But later he said the deal was saved.

“ISRAEL is not going to attack Iran. All planes will turn around and head home, while doing a friendly “Plane Wave” to Iran. Nobody will be hurt, the Ceasefire is in effect!” Trump said in his Truth Social post.

Indeed, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said he held off on tougher strike against Iran after speaking to Trump.

The conflict, now in its 12th day, began with Israel targeting Iranian nuclear and military sites, saying it could not allow Tehran to develop atomic weapons — and that it feared the Islamic Republic was close. Iran has long maintained that its program is peaceful.

Many worried the war might widen after the US joined the attacks by dropping bunker-buster bombs over the weekend and Israel expanded the kinds of targets it was hitting.

But after Tehran launched a limited retaliatory strike on a US military base in Qatar on Monday, Trump announced the ceasefire.

Israel accuses Iran of violating the truce. Iran denies that

The deal got off to a rocky start.

An Israeli military official who spoke on the condition of anonymity in line with military regulations said Iran launched two missiles at Israel hours into the tenuous ceasefire. Both were intercepted, the official said.

Iranian state television reported that the military denied firing missiles after the start of the ceasefire — while accusing Israel of conducting strikes.

As Trump spoke to reporters at the White House before departing for the NATO summit, he expressed disappointment with both sides.

Iran “violated it but Israel violated it too,” Trump said. ”I’m not happy with Israel.”

Trump’s frustration was palpable, using an expletive to hammer home his point.

“We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don’t know what the f— — they’re doing,” he said.

Later, however, he announced that Israel had backed off its threat to attack Tehran and would turn its jets around.

Netanyahu’s office said Israel struck an Iranian radar in response to the Iranian missile attack early Tuesday — but held off on something bigger.

“Following President Trump’s conversation with Prime Minister Netanyahu, Israel refrained from additional attacks,” Netanyahu’s office said.

Breakthrough announced after hostilities spread

Netanyahu said Israel had agreed to a bilateral ceasefire with Iran, in coordination with Trump, after the country achieved all of its war goals, including removing the threat of Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that his country would not fire at Israel if it was not fired upon, but that a “final decision on the cessation of our military operations will be made later.”

It’s unclear what role Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s leader, played in the talks. He said earlier on social media that he would not surrender.

Trump said Tuesday that he wasn’t seeking regime change in Iran, two days after first floating the idea.

“Regime change takes chaos,” Trump told reporters on Air Force One.

Over the weekend, he mused on his social media account that “if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn’t there be a Regime change???”

The ceasefire came after hostilities spread further across the region.

Israel’s military said Iran launched 20 missiles toward Israel before the ceasefire began on Tuesday morning. Police said they damaged at least three densely packed residential buildings in the city of Beersheba. First responders said they retrieved four bodies from one building and were searching for more. Earlier, the Fire and Rescue service said five bodies were found before revising the number downward. At least 20 people were injured.

Outside, the shells of burned out cars littered the streets. Broken glass and rubble covered the area. Police said some people were injured while inside their apartments’ reinforced safe rooms, which are meant to withstand rockets but not direct hits from ballistic missiles.

Iran launched a limited missile attack Monday on a US military base in Qatar, retaliating for earlier American bombing of its nuclear sites. The US was warned by Iran in advance, and there were no casualties.

Drones attacked military bases in Iraq overnight, including some housing US troops, the Iraqi army and a US military official said Tuesday.

A senior US military official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment publicly, said US forces had shot down drones attacking Ain Assad in the desert in western Iraq and at a base next to the Baghdad airport, while another one crashed.

No casualties were reported and no group claimed responsibility for the attacks in Iraq. Some Iran-backed Iraqi militias had previously threatened to target US bases if the US attacked Iran.

Conflict has killed hundreds

In Israel, at least 28 people have been killed and more than 1,000 wounded in the war. Israeli strikes on Iran have killed at least 974 people and wounded 3,458 others, according to the Washington-based group Human Rights Activists.

The group, which has provided detailed casualty figures from Iranian unrest, said of those killed, it identified 387 civilians and 268 security force personnel.

The US has evacuated some 250 American citizens and their immediate family members from Israel by government, military and charter flights that began over the weekend, a State Department official said.

There are roughly 700,000 American citizens, most of them dual US-Israeli citizens, believed to be in Israel.

Shadowy extremist group claims Damascus church attack

Updated 35 min 17 sec ago
Follow

Shadowy extremist group claims Damascus church attack

  • Saraya Ansar Al-Sunna said a group operative “blew up the Saint Elias church in the Dwelaa neighborhood of Damascus“
  • It came after unspecified “provocation“

BEIRUT: A little-known Sunni Muslim extremist group on Tuesday claimed responsibility for a suicide attack on a Damascus church over the weekend that authorities have blamed on the Daesh group.

Sunday’s attack killed 25 and wounded dozens of others, striking terror into the Syrian Arab Republic’s Christian community and other minorities.

A statement from Saraya Ansar Al-Sunna said a group operative “blew up the Saint Elias church in the Dwelaa neighborhood of Damascus,” saying it came after unspecified “provocation.”

The Islamist authorities who took power after ousting longtime ruler Bashar Assad in December had quickly blamed the attack on Daesh and announced several arrests on Monday in a security operation against Daesh-affiliated cells.

But the Saraya Ansar Al-Sunna statement on messaging app Telegram, where it counts several hundred followers, said the government’s version of events was “untrue, fabricated.”

The group, which was formed after Assad’s ouster, vowed that “what is coming will not give you respite” warning that “our soldiers... are fully prepared.”

In March, a dispute took place in front of the Saint Elias church, as residents expressed opposition to Islamic chants being played on loudspeakers from a car.

Sunday’s attack was the first suicide bombing in a church in Syria since the country’s civil war erupted in 2011, according to a Syrian monitor.

It followed sectarian violence in recent months including massacres of members of the Alawite sect to which Assad belongs and clashes with Druze fighters, with security one of the new authorities’ greatest challenges.

The bloodshed has raised concerns about the government’s ability to control radical fighters, after Islamist group Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham (HTS) led the offensive that ousted Assad.

HTS was once affiliated with Al-Qaeda before breaking ties in 2016.

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi, a Syria-based analyst and researcher, said Saraya Ansar Al-Sunna could be “a pro-Daesh splinter originating primarily from defectors from HTS... and other factions but currently operating independently of IS.”

He also said it could be “just a Daesh front group.”

Citing a Saraya source, Tamimi said a disillusioned former HTS functionary heads the group, whose leadership includes a former member of Hurras Al-Din, the Syrian Al-Qaeda affiliate which announced in January it was dissolving, upon the orders of the new government.

The monitor said Saraya Ansar Al-Sunna had previously threatened to target Alawites and had carried out an attack in Hama province earlier this year.

The group is accused of involvement in the sectarian massacres in March that the monitor alleged to have killed more than 1,700 people, mostly Alawite civilians.


Sirens in north Israel after army detects Iranian missiles

Updated 24 June 2025
Follow

Sirens in north Israel after army detects Iranian missiles

  • Israel and Iran on Tuesday accepted a ceasefire plan proposed by US President Donald Trump to end their 12-day war
  • Iran has not formally accepted a ceasefire

The Israeli military reported two missiles fired from Iran mid-morning on Tuesday, leading sirens to blare in the north several hours after US President Trump announced a ceasefire plan.

“Two missiles were launched from Iran and they were intercepted,” a military official told AFP on condition of anonymity, with the army saying people could leave shelters around 15 minuutes after the first alert.

Trump announced a phased 24-hour ceasefire process beginning at around 0400 GMT Tuesday, which Israel said it had agreed to. Iran has not formally accepted a ceasefire.

US President Donald Trump announced a phased 24-hour ceasefire process beginning at around 0400 GMT on June 24, which Israel said it had agreed to. Iran has not formally accepted a ceasefire. (AFP)

Israeli defence minister orders attacks on Iran after ceasefire 'violation'

Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said on Tuesday he had ordered the country’s military to respond forcefully to what he said was Iran’s violation of a ceasefire with Israel.

The directive followed an announcement by the military that it had detected missile launches from Iran towards Israel.

Less than three hours earlier, US President Donald Trump had said that the ceasefire was now in effect.

Katz said the military had been instructed to carry out high-intensity operations against targets in Tehran.

Israel and Iran on Tuesday accepted a ceasefire plan proposed by US President Donald Trump to end their 12-day war. (AFP)

Israel and Iran accept ceasefire

Israel and Iran on Tuesday accepted a ceasefire plan proposed by US President Donald Trump to end their 12-day war that roiled the Middle East, after Tehran launched a retaliatory limited missile attack on a US military base in Qatar.

The acceptance of the deal by both sides came after Tehran launched a final onslaught of missiles targeting Israel that killed at least four people early Tuesday morning, while Israel launched a blitz of airstrikes targeting sites across Iran before dawn.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel had agreed to a bilateral ceasefire with Iran in coordination with Trump.

Israeli PM Benjamin Natanyahu said he supported the ceasefire. (FILE/AFP)

Israel says agreed to Trump proposal for bilateral ceasefire with Iran

Israel said Tuesday it had agreed to a “bilateral ceasefire” with Iran proposed by US President Donald Trump, following 12 days of war with its arch-foe.

“Last night, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu convened the cabinet... to announce that Israel had achieved all the objectives of Operation ‘Rising Lion’ and much more,” the government said in a statement, adding that it had removed “an immediate dual existential threat: nuclear and ballistic”.

“Israel thanks President Trump and the United States for their support in defence and for their participation in removing the Iranian nuclear threat,” the statement said, adding that “Israel will respond forcefully to any violation of the ceasefire.”

Israel rescuers say 4 dead in multi-wave Iran missile attacks

At least four people were killed in Israel in a multi-wave Iranian missile attack Tuesday shortly before a staggered ceasefire announced by US President Donald Trump was meant to enter force, emergency services and the army said.

Writing on X, the Magen David Adom rescue service said three people were pronounced dead at the scene of a strike in southern Beersheba while a fourth was added in an update to its figures.

Another two people were “moderately injured” while 20 were treated for minor injuries and anxiety, it said.


UN condemns ‘weaponization of food’ in Gaza

Updated 24 June 2025
Follow

UN condemns ‘weaponization of food’ in Gaza

GENEVA: The United Nations on Tuesday condemned Israel’s apparent “weaponization of food” in Gaza, a war crime, and urged Israel’s military to “stop shooting at people trying to get food.”
“Israel’s militarised humanitarian assistance mechanism is in contradiction with international standards on aid distribution,” the UN human rights office said in written notes provided before a briefing.
“Desperate, hungry people in Gaza continue to face the inhumane choice of either starving to death or risk being killed while trying to get food.”
The US- and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) began food distribution operations in Gaza on May 26 after Israel completely cut off supplies into the occupied Palestinian territory for more than two months, sparking warnings of mass famine.
The UN said in May that “100 percent of the population” of the besieged territory were ” at risk of famine.”
The UN and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the GHF — an officially private effort with opaque funding — over concerns it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives.
UN rights office spokesman Thameen Al-Kheetan warned in the briefing notes of “scenes of chaos around the food distribution points” of the GHF.
Since the organization began operating, “the Israeli military has shelled and shot Palestinians trying to reach the distribution points, leading to many fatalities,” he said.
He pointed to reports that “over 410 Palestinians have been killed as a result, (while) at least 93 others have also been reportedly killed by the Israeli army while attempting to approach the very few aid convoys of the UN and other humanitarian organizations.”
“At least 3,000 Palestinians have been injured in these incidents,” he said.
“Each of these killings must be promptly and impartially investigated, and those responsible must be held to account.”
Kheetan cautioned that the system “endangers civilians and contributes to the catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza.”
“The weaponization of food for civilians, in addition to restricting or preventing their access to life-sustaining services, constitutes a war crime, and, under certain circumstances, may constitute elements of other crimes under international law,” he warned.
The UN rights office demanded immediate action to rectify the situation.
“The Israeli military must stop shooting at people trying to get food,” Kheetan said, also demanding that Israel “allow the entry of food and other humanitarian assistance needed to sustain the lives of Palestinians in Gaza.”
“It must immediately lift its unlawful restrictions on the work of UN and other humanitarian actors,” he said.
And he called on other countries to “take concrete steps to ensure that Israel — the occupying power in Gaza — complies with its duty to ensure that sufficient food and lifesaving necessities are provided to the population.”


Oman Air resumes flights as Iraq, Syria reopen airspace after Iran-Israel truce announcement

Updated 24 June 2025
Follow

Oman Air resumes flights as Iraq, Syria reopen airspace after Iran-Israel truce announcement

  • Iraq reopened its airspace 12 days after closing it amid the Iran-Israel conflict

DUBAI: Oman Air on Tuesday announced the resumption of flights as Iraq and Syria reopened their airspace following Israel and Iran’s acceptance of a ceasefire plan to end their 12-day war that had destabilized the region.

Iraq reopened its airspace 12 days after closing it during the Iran-Israel conflict, aviation authorities confirmed. The Iraqi Civil Aviation Authority said the move came “following a comprehensive assessment of the security situation and coordination with relevant national and international authorities.”

The reopening of airspace and resumption of flights is expected to ease regional flight disruptions and allow airlines to resume more direct and efficient routes.