She was the presumptive favorite in the 2016 US presidential election. She was also extremely qualified when compared to her inexperienced opponent. Yet, against all odds, she managed to lose to a divisive candidate who won in one of the most astounding victories in American political history. On the night of Nov. 8, 2016, when the results started pouring in, surprise gave way to astonishment as everyone asked the same question: What Happened to Hillary Rodham Clinton?
Everyone seems to have a theory as to why she failed to become the first woman president of the US. But what was going through her mind during that incredible election night? For the first time, Clinton looks back on the election in her book “What Happened.” She tells her side of the story with humor and sincerity and this poignant memoir will interest both her supporters and her detractors.
Clinton never imagined she write a book about the shocking loss, however, it is not a comprehensive account of the 2016 race as “that’s not for me to write, I have too little distance and too great a stake in it,” she writes.
She has chosen to focus on moments from the campaign, on people who inspired her and on the major challenges she has tackled during her nearly four decades in public service.
Despite the broad focus, it is natural that readers will wonder how she felt on the night of the election. Clinton, accompanied by her family and senior staff members, were staying at The Peninsula hotel, just a block away from Trump Tower. “The waiting was excruciating,” she admits. So, she decided to take a nap hoping that when she woke up, things would look better. When she got up, the atmosphere in her suite on the top floor was even gloomier and as the hours went by, the numbers were not getting any better.
“How had this happened? All our models, as well as all the public polls and predictions, gave us an excellent chance at victory. Now it was slipping away. I felt shell-shocked. I hadn’t prepared mentally for this at all. There had been no doomsday scenarios playing out in my head in the final days, no imagining what I might say if I lost. I just didn’t think about it. But now it was real as could be and I was struggling to get my head around it. It was like all the air in the room had been sucked and I could barely breathe.”
She gave her concession speech in a grey-and-purple suit that she intended to wear on her first trip to Washington as president elect. This is one of the many details that shows how Clinton was absolutely not prepared to lose. All her plans revolved around her victory.
Clinton spent the first day after her defeat following these dramatic events and doing very little else. She could not handle people’s kindness, sorrow and bewilderment and their explanations for how she had failed. “Bill and I kept the rest of the world out. I was grateful for the one billionth time that I had a husband who was good company, not just in happy times, but sad ones as well.” The next day, she finally reconnected with people, answering an avalanche of emails and returning phone calls.
Afterwards, she writes, she spent long hours walking with her husband and talking again and again about the unforeseeable loss. She also learned how to be grateful for the hard things. “My task was to be grateful for the humbling experience of losing the presidential election. Humility can be such a painful virtue.”
President Barack Obama played a key role in Clinton’s decision to run for president. He was well aware that his legacy depended, to a large extent, on a Democratic victory in 2016. “He made it clear that he believed that I was our party’s best chance to hold the White House and keep our progress going and he wanted me to move quickly to prepare to run.”
Clinton announced her candidacy in June 2015 and, amidst all the positive comments she received after her speech, she hardly paid attention to American journalist E.J. Dionne’s sharp remark: “Hillary Clinton is making a bet and issuing a challenge. The bet is that voters will pay more attention to what she can do for them than to what her opponents will say about her.”
We all now know that Clinton lost the white working-class vote, Trump garnered their attention with populist rhetoric and an excellent slogan — “Make America Great Again.”
Although Clinton dreams of a future in which women in the public eye will not be judged for how they look but for what they do, when she was campaigning, she always made time for her make-up and to have her hair done. “The few times I’ve gone out in public without makeup, it’s made the news,” she wrote in the book. Clinton even calculated how many hours it took her to have her hair and make-up done during the campaign. It came to 600 hours, which is equivalent to 25 days.
Clinton shares personal details in the book, for example, she tells readers that whenever she was traveling, she never went to sleep without calling her husband. These conversations kept her “grounded and at peace,” she writes, adding: “He’s funny, friendly, unflappable in the face of mishaps and inconveniences and easily delighted by the world…He is fabulous company.”
This book shows Clinton as we have never seen her before — vulnerable, forgiving and humble.
It leaves us all wondering, what will happen next?
Book Review: Hillary Clinton in her own words
Book Review: Hillary Clinton in her own words
What We Are Reading Today: ‘A Hunger Artist’
- Kafka’s exploration of the artist’s suffering is a metaphor for the broader human experience — where the search for authenticity and recognition often leads to despair and isolation
Author: Franz Kafka
“A Hunger Artist” is a novella by Franz Kafka, which was published in 1922.
The narrative follows a professional hunger artist whose act is to fast for extended periods, presenting his art as a spectacle for an audience.
Initially, his performances drew significant attention, and he became a celebrated figure, embodying the artist’s struggle against societal norms and expectations.
As the story progresses, the artist’s popularity wanes, and he becomes increasingly alienated.
The public’s fascination shifts to more modern forms of entertainment, and the hunger artist becomes a relic of a bygone era.
The hunger artist’s ultimate fate is tragic. Despite his dedication to his craft, he becomes a victim of societal indifference.
The book is a poignant 14-page short story that delves into themes of art, isolation, and the quest for meaning.
Kafka’s exploration of the artist’s suffering is a metaphor for the broader human experience — where the search for authenticity and recognition often leads to despair and isolation.
He masterfully captures the conflict between the artist’s inner world and external interpretations, demonstrating the need to understand and appreciate real creative expression.
The story culminates in the realization that true artistry is frequently unrecognized and undervalued.
In “A Hunger Artist,” Kafka crafts a powerful commentary on the complexities of identity, the ephemeral nature of fame, and the often lonely path of the artist, making it a compelling and thought-provoking work that resonates with anyone grappling with the meaning of creativity and existence.
His prose is spare yet evocative, employing a surreal tone that enhances the existential themes.
The story challenges readers to consider the nature of art, the role of the audience, and the sacrifices artists make for their craft.
Kafka is renowned for his surreal and existential narratives that still resonate with readers more than a century later. His best-known works include “The Metamorphosis,” “The Trial,” and “The Castle.”
What We Are Reading Today: Pandemic Politics
- Health is not an inherently polarizing issue, but the Trump administration’s partisan response to COVID-19 led ordinary citizens to prioritize what was good for their “team” rather than what was good for their country
Author: Shana Kushner Gadarian, Sara Wallace Goodman and Tomas B. Pepinsky
COVID-19 has killed more people than any war or public health crisis in American history, but the scale and grim human toll of the pandemic were not inevitable. Pandemic Politics examines how Donald Trump politicized COVID-19, shedding new light on how his administration tied the pandemic to the president’s political fate in an election year and chose partisanship over public health, with disastrous consequences for all of us.
Health is not an inherently polarizing issue, but the Trump administration’s partisan response to COVID-19 led ordinary citizens to prioritize what was good for their “team” rather than what was good for their country.
Democrats, in turn, viewed the crisis as evidence of Trump’s indifference to public well-being. At a time when solidarity and bipartisan unity were sorely needed, Americans came to see the pandemic in partisan terms, adopting behaviors and attitudes that continue to divide us today.
Trump victory renews interest in ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ and other fictional dystopias
- Margaret Atwood’s dystopian classic about a country in which women are brutally repressed has been high on the Amazon.com best seller list
NEW YORK: “The Handmaid’s Tale” is selling again.
Since President-elect Donald Trump clinched his return to the White House, Margaret Atwood’s dystopian classic about a country in which women are brutally repressed has been high on the Amazon.com best seller list. “The Handmaid’s Tale” was popular throughout Trump’s first term, along with such dark futuristic narratives as George Orwell’s “1984” and Ray Bradbury’s “Fahrenheit 451,” both of which were in the Amazon top 40 as of Thursday afternoon. Another best-seller from Trump’s previous time in office, Timothy Snyder’s “On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century,” was in the top 10.
Pro-Trump books also were selling well. Former first lady Melania Trump’s memoir, “Melania,” was No. 1 on the Amazon list, and Vice President-elect JD Vance’s “Hillbilly Elegy” was in the top 10. Donald Trump’s photo book “Save America” was in the top 30.
At Barnes & Noble, “Fiction and non-fiction books that feature fascism, feminism, dystopian worlds and both right-and-left leaning politics rocketed up our sales charts with the election results,” according to Shannon DeVito, the chain’s director of books. She cited “Melania,” “On Tyranny” and Bob Woodward’s latest, “War,” which covers the responses of Trump and President Joe Biden to the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East.
DeVito also cited “a massive bump in dystopian fiction,” notably for “The Handmaid’s Tale” and “1984.”
Book Review: ‘The Bird Tattoo’ by Dunya Mikhail
Reading Dunya Mikhail’s “The Bird Tattoo,” published in 2020, is embarking on a journey through the intricate layers of identity, loss and hope.
From the very first pages, readers will be drawn into the world of the unnamed protagonist, a journalist returning to her war-torn homeland of Iraq.
Mikhail’s writing envelops you, making you feel the weight of memories and the pulse of a country struggling to heal. One of the most striking aspects of the novel is its unflinching exploration of the painful subject of the sale of Yazidi women as slaves by Daesh.
Mikhail addresses this trauma with a delicate touch, balancing the harsh realities of this atrocity with an exploration of the astonishing world of Yazidi customs and legends.
This duality adds depth to the narrative, allowing readers to appreciate the richness of Yazidi culture even in the face of such unspeakable suffering. Mikhail tells these stories without exaggeration or sentimentality, which makes the emotional weight all the more impactful.
Many readers will find themselves reflecting on their own experiences with home and belonging. The tattoo of the bird, a symbol of freedom and escape, will resonate deeply with them.
It beautifully encapsulates the protagonist’s yearning for liberation from the constraints of her past and the chaos surrounding her.
Mikhail’s prose is both lyrical and haunting, painting vivid images of Baghdad that linger in the mind. Readers will hear the sounds of the city and feel the warmth of the sun, yet the underlying tension of conflict is always present.
This duality will strike a chord with them, as it mirrors the complexities of life — how beauty and pain often coexist.
The flashbacks woven throughout the story are particularly poignant. They allow readers to witness the protagonist’s childhood and the impact of war on her family relationships. They will feel her loss and her struggle to reconcile her past with her present.
One of the most powerful aspects of “The Bird Tattoo” is its exploration of resilience. Despite the heavy themes of loss and trauma, Mikhail instills a sense of hope throughout the narrative.
Readers will find themselves rooting for the characters, marveling at their strength and determination to find their place in a world that often feels unforgiving. This theme will inspire them.
The novel is not just a story about war; it is a profound meditation on identity, love, and the quest for freedom.
The fact that Mikhail, an Iraqi-American, went on to become the English translator of her own work, which is now available in several languages, speaks to her commitment to sharing these stories with the world.
This book left me with a deeper understanding of the complexities of human experience and the enduring spirit of those who face unimaginable challenges.
It has certainly stayed with me, encouraging me to think more deeply about my own journey and the stories that shape who we are.
What We Are Reading Today: ‘The Artist’s Palette’ by Alexandra Loske
What can the palette an artist used or depicted tell us about their artistic process, preferences, and finished works? From traditional wooden boards to paint pots, ceramic plates, and studio walls, these deceptively simple yet potent tools provide vital evidence. “The Artist’s Palette” presents 50 unique palettes alongside paintings by the celebrated artists who used them, gathering expert analysis of color, brushstroke, and technique to offer new histories of these artists and their work.
